利用核磁共振成像对肝脏铁质进行量化的最新技术--供应商实施情况和可用工具。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1002/jmri.29526
Aaryani Tipirneni-Sajja, Utsav Shrestha, Juan Esparza, Cara E Morin, Stephan Kannengiesser, Nathan T Roberts, Johannes M Peeters, Samir D Sharma, Houchun H Hu
{"title":"利用核磁共振成像对肝脏铁质进行量化的最新技术--供应商实施情况和可用工具。","authors":"Aaryani Tipirneni-Sajja, Utsav Shrestha, Juan Esparza, Cara E Morin, Stephan Kannengiesser, Nathan T Roberts, Johannes M Peeters, Samir D Sharma, Houchun H Hu","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of MRI to estimate liver iron concentration (LIC) for identifying patients with iron overload and guiding the titration of chelation therapy is increasingly established for routine clinical practice. However, the existence of multiple MRI-based LIC quantification techniques limits standardization and widespread clinical adoption. In this article, we review the existing and widely accepted MRI-based LIC estimation methods at 1.5 T and 3 T: signal intensity ratio (SIR) and relaxometry (R2 and R2*) and discuss the basic principles, acquisition and analysis protocols, and MRI-LIC calibrations for each technique. Further, we provide an up-to-date information on MRI vendor implementations and available offline commercial and free software for each MRI-based LIC quantification approach. We also briefly review the emerging and advanced MRI techniques for LIC estimation and their current limitations for clinical use. Lastly, we discuss the implications of MRI-based LIC measurements on clinical use and decision-making in the management of patients with iron overload. Some of the key highlights from this review are as follows: 1) Both R2 and R2* can estimate accurate and reproducible LIC, when validated acquisition parameters and analysis protocols are applied, 2) Although the Ferriscan R2 method has been widely used, recent consensus and guidelines endorse R2*-MRI as the most accurate and reproducible method for LIC estimation, 3) Ongoing efforts aim to establish R2*-MRI as the standard approach for quantifying LIC, and 4) Emerging R2*-MRI techniques employ radial sampling strategies and offer improved motion compensation and broader dynamic range for LIC estimation. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State-of-the-Art Quantification of Liver Iron With MRI-Vendor Implementation and Available Tools.\",\"authors\":\"Aaryani Tipirneni-Sajja, Utsav Shrestha, Juan Esparza, Cara E Morin, Stephan Kannengiesser, Nathan T Roberts, Johannes M Peeters, Samir D Sharma, Houchun H Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmri.29526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The role of MRI to estimate liver iron concentration (LIC) for identifying patients with iron overload and guiding the titration of chelation therapy is increasingly established for routine clinical practice. However, the existence of multiple MRI-based LIC quantification techniques limits standardization and widespread clinical adoption. In this article, we review the existing and widely accepted MRI-based LIC estimation methods at 1.5 T and 3 T: signal intensity ratio (SIR) and relaxometry (R2 and R2*) and discuss the basic principles, acquisition and analysis protocols, and MRI-LIC calibrations for each technique. Further, we provide an up-to-date information on MRI vendor implementations and available offline commercial and free software for each MRI-based LIC quantification approach. We also briefly review the emerging and advanced MRI techniques for LIC estimation and their current limitations for clinical use. Lastly, we discuss the implications of MRI-based LIC measurements on clinical use and decision-making in the management of patients with iron overload. Some of the key highlights from this review are as follows: 1) Both R2 and R2* can estimate accurate and reproducible LIC, when validated acquisition parameters and analysis protocols are applied, 2) Although the Ferriscan R2 method has been widely used, recent consensus and guidelines endorse R2*-MRI as the most accurate and reproducible method for LIC estimation, 3) Ongoing efforts aim to establish R2*-MRI as the standard approach for quantifying LIC, and 4) Emerging R2*-MRI techniques employ radial sampling strategies and offer improved motion compensation and broader dynamic range for LIC estimation. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29526\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在常规临床实践中,核磁共振成像估算肝脏铁浓度(LIC)以确定铁超载患者并指导螯合疗法滴定的作用日益得到认可。然而,基于磁共振成像的多种 LIC 定量技术的存在限制了标准化和临床广泛采用。在本文中,我们回顾了 1.5 T 和 3 T 下现有的、广为接受的基于 MRI 的 LIC 估算方法:信号强度比(SIR)和弛豫测量(R2 和 R2*),并讨论了每种技术的基本原理、采集和分析协议以及 MRI-LIC 校准。此外,我们还为每种基于 MRI 的 LIC 定量方法提供了最新的 MRI 供应商实施信息以及可用的离线商业和免费软件。我们还简要回顾了用于 LIC 估计的新兴和先进 MRI 技术及其目前在临床应用中的局限性。最后,我们讨论了基于 MRI 的 LIC 测量对临床应用和铁超载患者管理决策的影响。本综述的一些要点如下:1)如果采用经过验证的采集参数和分析协议,R2 和 R2* 都能估算出准确且可重复的 LIC;2)虽然 Ferriscan R2 方法已被广泛使用,但最近的共识和指南认可 R2*-MRI 是估算 LIC 的最准确且可重复的方法;3)正在进行的努力旨在将 R2*-MRI 确立为量化 LIC 的标准方法;4)新兴的 R2*-MRI 技术采用径向采样策略,为 LIC 估算提供了更好的运动补偿和更宽的动态范围。证据等级:1 技术效率:第 2 阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
State-of-the-Art Quantification of Liver Iron With MRI-Vendor Implementation and Available Tools.

The role of MRI to estimate liver iron concentration (LIC) for identifying patients with iron overload and guiding the titration of chelation therapy is increasingly established for routine clinical practice. However, the existence of multiple MRI-based LIC quantification techniques limits standardization and widespread clinical adoption. In this article, we review the existing and widely accepted MRI-based LIC estimation methods at 1.5 T and 3 T: signal intensity ratio (SIR) and relaxometry (R2 and R2*) and discuss the basic principles, acquisition and analysis protocols, and MRI-LIC calibrations for each technique. Further, we provide an up-to-date information on MRI vendor implementations and available offline commercial and free software for each MRI-based LIC quantification approach. We also briefly review the emerging and advanced MRI techniques for LIC estimation and their current limitations for clinical use. Lastly, we discuss the implications of MRI-based LIC measurements on clinical use and decision-making in the management of patients with iron overload. Some of the key highlights from this review are as follows: 1) Both R2 and R2* can estimate accurate and reproducible LIC, when validated acquisition parameters and analysis protocols are applied, 2) Although the Ferriscan R2 method has been widely used, recent consensus and guidelines endorse R2*-MRI as the most accurate and reproducible method for LIC estimation, 3) Ongoing efforts aim to establish R2*-MRI as the standard approach for quantifying LIC, and 4) Emerging R2*-MRI techniques employ radial sampling strategies and offer improved motion compensation and broader dynamic range for LIC estimation. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1