孕期药物使用的筛查和早期干预:产前护理记录的回顾性病例记录。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Drug and alcohol review Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1111/dar.13927
Matthew W. R. Stevens, Megan Cooper, Lynette Cusack, Robert L. Ali, Chris Holmwood, Annette L. Briley
{"title":"孕期药物使用的筛查和早期干预:产前护理记录的回顾性病例记录。","authors":"Matthew W. R. Stevens,&nbsp;Megan Cooper,&nbsp;Lynette Cusack,&nbsp;Robert L. Ali,&nbsp;Chris Holmwood,&nbsp;Annette L. Briley","doi":"10.1111/dar.13927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Screening for substance use during pregnancy is critical for enhancing maternal health and perinatal outcomes. However, disparities persist in screening and intervention rates within maternity services. This retrospective case note review explored contemporaneous practices around screening and interventions for substance use among pregnant women during routine antenatal care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A random sample of 100 sets of maternity records were reviewed. Eligible cases included any woman attending initial pregnancy assessments at one of two South Australian metropolitan Hospital-based antenatal clinics, from July 2019–September 2020. Screening rates for past and current alcohol, tobacco and other substance use were identified and compared with data from a subset of a nationally representative survey. Intervention details and referral pathways were also assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The final sample of eligible cases (<i>n</i> = 93) demonstrated prioritisation of screening for current use, over past use, across all substances (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Screening was most likely for tobacco and least likely for e-cigarettes (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Significant underreporting of past use compared with the benchmark was identified for all substances (except tobacco, <i>p</i> = 0.224). Interventions typically involved written resources, which were usually declined by clients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Despite longstanding recommendations, screening and intervention practices for substance use appear inconsistent. With the recent emergence of vaping, no evidence of updated approaches to identifying e-cigarette consumption in pregnant women was found. Several opportunities for enhancing routine screening and intervention practices within antenatal clinics were identified, and will inform the development of policy directives, targeted training modules, and other resources for health professionals working in these services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"43 7","pages":"1817-1828"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.13927","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening and early intervention for substance use during pregnancy: A retrospective case note review of antenatal care records\",\"authors\":\"Matthew W. R. Stevens,&nbsp;Megan Cooper,&nbsp;Lynette Cusack,&nbsp;Robert L. Ali,&nbsp;Chris Holmwood,&nbsp;Annette L. Briley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dar.13927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Screening for substance use during pregnancy is critical for enhancing maternal health and perinatal outcomes. However, disparities persist in screening and intervention rates within maternity services. This retrospective case note review explored contemporaneous practices around screening and interventions for substance use among pregnant women during routine antenatal care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A random sample of 100 sets of maternity records were reviewed. Eligible cases included any woman attending initial pregnancy assessments at one of two South Australian metropolitan Hospital-based antenatal clinics, from July 2019–September 2020. Screening rates for past and current alcohol, tobacco and other substance use were identified and compared with data from a subset of a nationally representative survey. Intervention details and referral pathways were also assessed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The final sample of eligible cases (<i>n</i> = 93) demonstrated prioritisation of screening for current use, over past use, across all substances (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Screening was most likely for tobacco and least likely for e-cigarettes (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Significant underreporting of past use compared with the benchmark was identified for all substances (except tobacco, <i>p</i> = 0.224). Interventions typically involved written resources, which were usually declined by clients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite longstanding recommendations, screening and intervention practices for substance use appear inconsistent. With the recent emergence of vaping, no evidence of updated approaches to identifying e-cigarette consumption in pregnant women was found. Several opportunities for enhancing routine screening and intervention practices within antenatal clinics were identified, and will inform the development of policy directives, targeted training modules, and other resources for health professionals working in these services.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"volume\":\"43 7\",\"pages\":\"1817-1828\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.13927\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.13927\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.13927","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:筛查孕期药物使用情况对于改善孕产妇健康和围产期结果至关重要。然而,产科服务中的筛查和干预率仍存在差异。这项回顾性病例研究探讨了在常规产前检查中对孕妇进行药物使用筛查和干预的做法:方法:随机抽样审查了 100 份产科记录。符合条件的病例包括 2019 年 7 月至 2020 年 9 月期间,在南澳大利亚州两家都市医院产前诊所中的一家接受初次妊娠评估的任何女性。我们确定了过去和现在的酒精、烟草和其他物质使用筛查率,并将其与一项全国代表性调查的子集数据进行了比较。此外,还对干预细节和转诊途径进行了评估:结果:符合条件的最终样本(n = 93)显示,在所有物质的使用中,优先筛查当前使用情况,而不是过去使用情况(p 讨论和结论:尽管建议由来已久,但针对药物使用的筛查和干预措施似乎并不一致。最近出现了吸食电子烟的现象,但没有证据表明有更新的方法来识别孕妇吸食电子烟的情况。研究发现了一些在产前检查诊所加强常规筛查和干预措施的机会,并将为制定政策指令、开发有针对性的培训模块以及为在这些服务机构工作的医疗专业人员提供其他资源提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Screening and early intervention for substance use during pregnancy: A retrospective case note review of antenatal care records

Introduction

Screening for substance use during pregnancy is critical for enhancing maternal health and perinatal outcomes. However, disparities persist in screening and intervention rates within maternity services. This retrospective case note review explored contemporaneous practices around screening and interventions for substance use among pregnant women during routine antenatal care.

Methods

A random sample of 100 sets of maternity records were reviewed. Eligible cases included any woman attending initial pregnancy assessments at one of two South Australian metropolitan Hospital-based antenatal clinics, from July 2019–September 2020. Screening rates for past and current alcohol, tobacco and other substance use were identified and compared with data from a subset of a nationally representative survey. Intervention details and referral pathways were also assessed.

Results

The final sample of eligible cases (n = 93) demonstrated prioritisation of screening for current use, over past use, across all substances (p < 0.001). Screening was most likely for tobacco and least likely for e-cigarettes (p < 0.001). Significant underreporting of past use compared with the benchmark was identified for all substances (except tobacco, p = 0.224). Interventions typically involved written resources, which were usually declined by clients.

Discussion and Conclusions

Despite longstanding recommendations, screening and intervention practices for substance use appear inconsistent. With the recent emergence of vaping, no evidence of updated approaches to identifying e-cigarette consumption in pregnant women was found. Several opportunities for enhancing routine screening and intervention practices within antenatal clinics were identified, and will inform the development of policy directives, targeted training modules, and other resources for health professionals working in these services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
期刊最新文献
A chance for countries to support Ireland's world-leading cancer warning labels for alcohol containers. Drinking practices: The variation of drinking events across intersections of sex, age and household income. Childhood traumatic experiences and vaping among Australian adolescents: A prospective investigation. Issue Information Australian psychologists' attitudes towards psychedelic-assisted therapy and training following a world-first drug down-scheduling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1