衡量创造力和幸福感的自我信念

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101604
Molly Holinger , James C. Kaufman
{"title":"衡量创造力和幸福感的自我信念","authors":"Molly Holinger ,&nbsp;James C. Kaufman","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this investigation was to develop an instrument that measures the extent to which people believe that creativity leads to well-being. The instrument was designed to have two factors: belief that creativity leads to well-being in the short-term and belief that creativity leads to well-being in the long-term. The factors reflected a bipartite conceptualization of well-being as hedonia (short-term) and eudaimonia (long-term). Study 1 provided a basis for reliability and the hypothesized factor structure, offering evidence that there is indeed a distinction between seeing the connection between creativity and well-being more beneficially in the short-term versus the long-term. In Study 2, a confirmatory factor analysis provided further evidence for the two-factor structure. We also found a weak but significant relationship to two related measures: the Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS; Lyubomirsky &amp; Lepper, 1999) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Diener et al., 1985), and with creative self-efficacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 101604"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring self-beliefs of creativity and well-being\",\"authors\":\"Molly Holinger ,&nbsp;James C. Kaufman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of this investigation was to develop an instrument that measures the extent to which people believe that creativity leads to well-being. The instrument was designed to have two factors: belief that creativity leads to well-being in the short-term and belief that creativity leads to well-being in the long-term. The factors reflected a bipartite conceptualization of well-being as hedonia (short-term) and eudaimonia (long-term). Study 1 provided a basis for reliability and the hypothesized factor structure, offering evidence that there is indeed a distinction between seeing the connection between creativity and well-being more beneficially in the short-term versus the long-term. In Study 2, a confirmatory factor analysis provided further evidence for the two-factor structure. We also found a weak but significant relationship to two related measures: the Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS; Lyubomirsky &amp; Lepper, 1999) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Diener et al., 1985), and with creative self-efficacy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"volume\":\"53 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124001421\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124001421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项调查的目的是开发一种工具,用于测量人们在多大程度上相信创造力会带来幸福感。该工具设计了两个因子:认为创造力会带来短期幸福感的因子和认为创造力会带来长期幸福感的因子。这两个因子反映了幸福感的两元概念,即 "幸福感"(短期)和 "幸福感"(长期)。研究 1 为可靠性和假设的因子结构提供了依据,证明了在短期与长期之间,确实存在着认为创造力与幸福之间的联系更有益的区别。在研究 2 中,确认性因子分析为双因子结构提供了进一步的证据。我们还发现,主观幸福感量表(SHS; Lyubomirsky & Lepper, 1999)和生活满意度量表(SWLS; Diener et al.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring self-beliefs of creativity and well-being

The purpose of this investigation was to develop an instrument that measures the extent to which people believe that creativity leads to well-being. The instrument was designed to have two factors: belief that creativity leads to well-being in the short-term and belief that creativity leads to well-being in the long-term. The factors reflected a bipartite conceptualization of well-being as hedonia (short-term) and eudaimonia (long-term). Study 1 provided a basis for reliability and the hypothesized factor structure, offering evidence that there is indeed a distinction between seeing the connection between creativity and well-being more beneficially in the short-term versus the long-term. In Study 2, a confirmatory factor analysis provided further evidence for the two-factor structure. We also found a weak but significant relationship to two related measures: the Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS; Lyubomirsky & Lepper, 1999) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Diener et al., 1985), and with creative self-efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
Validation and network structure of the Kaufman domains of creativity scale: A psychometric investigation in an Arabic context Creativity and motor skill learning among kindergarten children: Investigating Predictive correlations and performance differences The influence of group categorization and common ingroup identity on malevolent creativity, benevolent creativity, and neutral creativity The long-term impact of executive functions on everyday creativity among Chinese adolescents: A longitudinal mediation model of emotional resilience and creative self-efficacy Measuring parental behaviors supporting higher order thinking skills in children: A scale development study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1