氢气增产的国际供应链:德国氢气运输路线的技术经济评估

IF 7.1 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Conversion and Management-X Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100682
{"title":"氢气增产的国际供应链:德国氢气运输路线的技术经济评估","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The widespread deployment of green hydrogen plays a crucial role in decarbonizing economies. Achieving global market competitiveness for green hydrogen necessitates not only competitive production costs, high generation capacity, and favorable political-economic conditions but also cost-effective transportation solutions. This is particularly vital for energy-intensive industrial nations like Germany, which will increasingly rely on hydrogen imports. This study assesses Germany due to its significant industrial demand and strategic location in Europe. Norway, Spain, and Morocco were chosen for their potential as major hydrogen exporters based on geographical proximity and renewable energy resources. Australia serves as a reference scenario for evaluating differing transportation costs depending on the distance. The transportation of compressed gaseous hydrogen via new and retrofitted natural gas pipelines, or liquefied hydrogen and liquid organic hydrogen carriers via maritime routes, currently represent the most promising alternatives. This paper conducts a techno-economic analysis on the transportation of green hydrogen from these countries to Germany by 2050. This year is pivotal as it aligns with Europe’s ambitious decarbonization goals, by which time a robust hydrogen market is anticipated to be established. The analysis employs the concept of Levelized Transportation Cost, evaluating costs across actual transportation routes, to provide insights into the most economically viable methods for hydrogen transport in a future decarbonized Europe. Various scenarios were designed to explore future developments. The analysis finds that for all countries examined, pipeline transportation of compressed hydrogen presents the lowest costs (0.08 €/kg to 1.34 €/kg), rendering it preferable to maritime transport options − with costs for liquefied hydrogen ranging between 1.73 €/kg and 3.40 €/kg, and for liquid organic hydrogen carriers between 2.33 €/kg and 7.29 €/kg. Transportation from Norway across all examined supply chains yields the lowest costs, followed by Spain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37131,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174524001600/pdfft?md5=77a01840ed11ccb93b2169d4fe40d2a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2590174524001600-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International supply chains for a hydrogen ramp-up: Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen transport routes to Germany\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The widespread deployment of green hydrogen plays a crucial role in decarbonizing economies. Achieving global market competitiveness for green hydrogen necessitates not only competitive production costs, high generation capacity, and favorable political-economic conditions but also cost-effective transportation solutions. This is particularly vital for energy-intensive industrial nations like Germany, which will increasingly rely on hydrogen imports. This study assesses Germany due to its significant industrial demand and strategic location in Europe. Norway, Spain, and Morocco were chosen for their potential as major hydrogen exporters based on geographical proximity and renewable energy resources. Australia serves as a reference scenario for evaluating differing transportation costs depending on the distance. The transportation of compressed gaseous hydrogen via new and retrofitted natural gas pipelines, or liquefied hydrogen and liquid organic hydrogen carriers via maritime routes, currently represent the most promising alternatives. This paper conducts a techno-economic analysis on the transportation of green hydrogen from these countries to Germany by 2050. This year is pivotal as it aligns with Europe’s ambitious decarbonization goals, by which time a robust hydrogen market is anticipated to be established. The analysis employs the concept of Levelized Transportation Cost, evaluating costs across actual transportation routes, to provide insights into the most economically viable methods for hydrogen transport in a future decarbonized Europe. Various scenarios were designed to explore future developments. The analysis finds that for all countries examined, pipeline transportation of compressed hydrogen presents the lowest costs (0.08 €/kg to 1.34 €/kg), rendering it preferable to maritime transport options − with costs for liquefied hydrogen ranging between 1.73 €/kg and 3.40 €/kg, and for liquid organic hydrogen carriers between 2.33 €/kg and 7.29 €/kg. Transportation from Norway across all examined supply chains yields the lowest costs, followed by Spain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management-X\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174524001600/pdfft?md5=77a01840ed11ccb93b2169d4fe40d2a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2590174524001600-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management-X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174524001600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174524001600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绿色氢气的广泛应用在经济去碳化方面发挥着至关重要的作用。要实现绿色氢气的全球市场竞争力,不仅需要具有竞争力的生产成本、高发电能力和有利的政治经济条件,还需要具有成本效益的运输解决方案。这对于像德国这样的能源密集型工业国家尤为重要,因为这些国家将越来越依赖氢气进口。本研究对德国进行了评估,因为德国的工业需求巨大,而且在欧洲具有战略地位。挪威、西班牙和摩洛哥因地理位置邻近和拥有可再生能源资源而被选为主要氢出口国。澳大利亚作为参考方案,用于评估不同距离的不同运输成本。通过新建和改造天然气管道运输压缩气态氢,或通过海运路线运输液化氢和液态有机氢载体,是目前最有前景的替代方案。本文对到 2050 年从这些国家向德国运输绿色氢气进行了技术经济分析。这一年至关重要,因为它与欧洲雄心勃勃的去碳化目标相吻合,届时一个强大的氢市场有望建立起来。该分析采用了 "平准化运输成本 "的概念,对实际运输路线的成本进行评估,以深入了解未来去碳化欧洲最经济可行的氢气运输方法。我们设计了各种方案来探索未来的发展。分析发现,在所有考察过的国家中,压缩氢的管道运输成本最低(0.08 欧元/千克到 1.34 欧元/千克),因此比海运方式更可取--液化氢的成本在 1.73 欧元/千克到 3.40 欧元/千克之间,液态有机氢运输工具的成本在 2.33 欧元/千克到 7.29 欧元/千克之间。在所有考察的供应链中,从挪威运输的成本最低,其次是西班牙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
International supply chains for a hydrogen ramp-up: Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen transport routes to Germany

The widespread deployment of green hydrogen plays a crucial role in decarbonizing economies. Achieving global market competitiveness for green hydrogen necessitates not only competitive production costs, high generation capacity, and favorable political-economic conditions but also cost-effective transportation solutions. This is particularly vital for energy-intensive industrial nations like Germany, which will increasingly rely on hydrogen imports. This study assesses Germany due to its significant industrial demand and strategic location in Europe. Norway, Spain, and Morocco were chosen for their potential as major hydrogen exporters based on geographical proximity and renewable energy resources. Australia serves as a reference scenario for evaluating differing transportation costs depending on the distance. The transportation of compressed gaseous hydrogen via new and retrofitted natural gas pipelines, or liquefied hydrogen and liquid organic hydrogen carriers via maritime routes, currently represent the most promising alternatives. This paper conducts a techno-economic analysis on the transportation of green hydrogen from these countries to Germany by 2050. This year is pivotal as it aligns with Europe’s ambitious decarbonization goals, by which time a robust hydrogen market is anticipated to be established. The analysis employs the concept of Levelized Transportation Cost, evaluating costs across actual transportation routes, to provide insights into the most economically viable methods for hydrogen transport in a future decarbonized Europe. Various scenarios were designed to explore future developments. The analysis finds that for all countries examined, pipeline transportation of compressed hydrogen presents the lowest costs (0.08 €/kg to 1.34 €/kg), rendering it preferable to maritime transport options − with costs for liquefied hydrogen ranging between 1.73 €/kg and 3.40 €/kg, and for liquid organic hydrogen carriers between 2.33 €/kg and 7.29 €/kg. Transportation from Norway across all examined supply chains yields the lowest costs, followed by Spain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
180
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Energy Conversion and Management: X is the open access extension of the reputable journal Energy Conversion and Management, serving as a platform for interdisciplinary research on a wide array of critical energy subjects. The journal is dedicated to publishing original contributions and in-depth technical review articles that present groundbreaking research on topics spanning energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management, and sustainability. The scope of Energy Conversion and Management: X encompasses various forms of energy, including mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic, and electric energy. It addresses all known energy resources, highlighting both conventional sources like fossil fuels and nuclear power, as well as renewable resources such as solar, biomass, hydro, wind, geothermal, and ocean energy.
期刊最新文献
Water desalination using waste heat recovery of thermal power plant in tropical climate; optimization by AI Thermal management performance of a novel elliptically grooved flat heat pipe system embedded with internally cooled condenser Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and cost of energy transport from Saudi Arabia with conventional fuels and liquefied natural gas Circulation of self-supplied water for significant energy recovery through heat integration A novel algorithm for optimizing genset operations to minimize fuel consumption in remote diesel-RES microgrids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1