关于健康食品包装前营养标签与塑料包装材料之间相互作用的调查

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105291
{"title":"关于健康食品包装前营养标签与塑料包装材料之间相互作用的调查","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the last decades, Front-of-Pack Nutritional Labels (FOPLs) have been introduced in multiple forms as a strong signal to support consumers in making more informed and healthier food choices. Limited attention has been devoted to how such labels interact with other package cues in affecting customers’ food selection processes. Our research aims to investigate the under-explored topic of how the interplay between Front-of-Pack Nutritional Labels and package material affects food quality perception.</p><p>By exploring the case of healthy foods in plastic packages through a multi-method research approach, we demonstrate across 3 studies (N=524) that healthy foods (e.g., cereals, salads) packed in plastic packages featuring FOPLs (<em>versus</em> no FOPLs) are perceived as more trustworthy by consumers, moreover we showed that compared to directive labels like the Nutri-Score, non-directive labels such as the NutrInform Battery increase perceived trust in the packaging material, which in turn generates higher perceptions of food health quality. Furthermore, we found that this effect is magnified when the plastic food packaging contains virtuous elements signaling sustainability. This research advances existing knowledge on food labels by offering new insights into their role as external cues that affect not only perceptions of food quality but also perceptions of packaging materials. This includes materials like plastic, which are negatively evaluated by consumers but are in some cases essential for food storage and preservation.</p><p>Our findings provide valuable insights for both policymakers and managers aiming at designing initiatives to promote healthy food in the presence of packaging materials perceived as unhealthy or unsustainable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001939/pdfft?md5=7baacc87f45d721e8019b33c22f1514b&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324001939-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation on the interplay between Front-of-Pack nutritional labels and plastic packaging materials in healthy foods\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Over the last decades, Front-of-Pack Nutritional Labels (FOPLs) have been introduced in multiple forms as a strong signal to support consumers in making more informed and healthier food choices. Limited attention has been devoted to how such labels interact with other package cues in affecting customers’ food selection processes. Our research aims to investigate the under-explored topic of how the interplay between Front-of-Pack Nutritional Labels and package material affects food quality perception.</p><p>By exploring the case of healthy foods in plastic packages through a multi-method research approach, we demonstrate across 3 studies (N=524) that healthy foods (e.g., cereals, salads) packed in plastic packages featuring FOPLs (<em>versus</em> no FOPLs) are perceived as more trustworthy by consumers, moreover we showed that compared to directive labels like the Nutri-Score, non-directive labels such as the NutrInform Battery increase perceived trust in the packaging material, which in turn generates higher perceptions of food health quality. Furthermore, we found that this effect is magnified when the plastic food packaging contains virtuous elements signaling sustainability. This research advances existing knowledge on food labels by offering new insights into their role as external cues that affect not only perceptions of food quality but also perceptions of packaging materials. This includes materials like plastic, which are negatively evaluated by consumers but are in some cases essential for food storage and preservation.</p><p>Our findings provide valuable insights for both policymakers and managers aiming at designing initiatives to promote healthy food in the presence of packaging materials perceived as unhealthy or unsustainable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001939/pdfft?md5=7baacc87f45d721e8019b33c22f1514b&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324001939-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001939\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324001939","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,包装前营养标签(FOPL)以多种形式出现,作为一种强烈的信号,支持消费者做出更明智、更健康的食品选择。但人们对这些标签如何与其他包装提示相互作用以影响消费者的食品选择过程的关注还很有限。我们的研究旨在探讨包装前营养标签与包装材料之间的相互作用如何影响食品质量感知这一尚未被充分探索的课题。通过采用多种研究方法探索塑料包装健康食品的案例,我们在 3 项研究(N=524)中证明,包装在塑料包装中的健康食品(如谷物、沙拉等)会影响消费者的食品质量感知、我们通过 3 项研究(N=524)证明,健康食品(如谷物、沙拉)包装在带有持久性有机污染物标签(相对于无持久性有机污染物标签)的塑料包装中,消费者认为其更值得信赖,而且,我们还发现,与营养分数等指令性标签相比,营养信息电池等非指令性标签能提高消费者对包装材料的信任度,进而提高对食品健康质量的认知度。此外,我们还发现,当塑料食品包装含有可持续发展的良性元素时,这种效应会被放大。这项研究对食品标签作为外部线索的作用有了新的认识,这些外部线索不仅会影响人们对食品质量的认知,还会影响人们对包装材料的认知。我们的研究结果为政策制定者和管理者提供了有价值的见解,他们的目标是在包装材料被认为不健康或不可持续的情况下,设计推广健康食品的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An investigation on the interplay between Front-of-Pack nutritional labels and plastic packaging materials in healthy foods

Over the last decades, Front-of-Pack Nutritional Labels (FOPLs) have been introduced in multiple forms as a strong signal to support consumers in making more informed and healthier food choices. Limited attention has been devoted to how such labels interact with other package cues in affecting customers’ food selection processes. Our research aims to investigate the under-explored topic of how the interplay between Front-of-Pack Nutritional Labels and package material affects food quality perception.

By exploring the case of healthy foods in plastic packages through a multi-method research approach, we demonstrate across 3 studies (N=524) that healthy foods (e.g., cereals, salads) packed in plastic packages featuring FOPLs (versus no FOPLs) are perceived as more trustworthy by consumers, moreover we showed that compared to directive labels like the Nutri-Score, non-directive labels such as the NutrInform Battery increase perceived trust in the packaging material, which in turn generates higher perceptions of food health quality. Furthermore, we found that this effect is magnified when the plastic food packaging contains virtuous elements signaling sustainability. This research advances existing knowledge on food labels by offering new insights into their role as external cues that affect not only perceptions of food quality but also perceptions of packaging materials. This includes materials like plastic, which are negatively evaluated by consumers but are in some cases essential for food storage and preservation.

Our findings provide valuable insights for both policymakers and managers aiming at designing initiatives to promote healthy food in the presence of packaging materials perceived as unhealthy or unsustainable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the effect of familiarity on sports performance food perception in various simulated consumption contexts A large-scale investigation of eating behaviors and meal perceptions in Italian primary school cafeterias: The relationship between emotions, meal perception, and food waste Assessing moderated mediation effects influencing consumer acceptance of cell-cultured Meat: A PLS-SEM modeling approach The negative association between food neophobia and sensory expectations revealed through analysis of consumers’ open-ended descriptions of seafood The Last Bite: Exploring behavioural and situational factors influencing leftover food waste in households
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1