{"title":"改变后碳未来的景观:作为奥克尼群岛能源基础设施体验的视觉反应想象","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article critiques the prevailing future-oriented collective visions often used in energy research, emphasizing the need for ethnographic examination of individual interpretations and responses to energy transitions. It explores how individuals coexist with evolving energy landscapes, particularly in rural areas. Despite recommendations for qualitative research on energy aesthetics, there is a gap in understanding of the experiential, visual elements of energy transitions. Studies predominantly prioritize quantifiable preferences over subjective experiences. Drawing a distinction between aesthetics and visuality, it delves into the subjective experience of visual interactions with energy infrastructure. Grounded in empirical data gathered over a year in the Orkney Islands, it utilizes participatory photography and photo-elicitation to capture local perspectives. This offers an alternative approach to researching energy transitions in rural landscapes. The findings emphasise the complexities of living with localised energy development at an individual level, highlighting dilemmas, challenges, and opportunities. Integrating individual visual perspectives into future planning remains a challenge, yet individuals often develop unique strategies to coexist with energy infrastructure in rapidly changing landscapes. Engaging with local stakeholders through (visual) ethnographic research can reveal diverse perspectives, contributing to the understanding of the impact of energy transitions in rural communities such as the Orkney Islands.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003104/pdfft?md5=a0e64b6b41ef9b5c3dada801eaecb8bb&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624003104-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Altered landscapes of a post‑carbon future: Visual response imaginaries as experiences of energy infrastructure in the Orkney Islands\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article critiques the prevailing future-oriented collective visions often used in energy research, emphasizing the need for ethnographic examination of individual interpretations and responses to energy transitions. It explores how individuals coexist with evolving energy landscapes, particularly in rural areas. Despite recommendations for qualitative research on energy aesthetics, there is a gap in understanding of the experiential, visual elements of energy transitions. Studies predominantly prioritize quantifiable preferences over subjective experiences. Drawing a distinction between aesthetics and visuality, it delves into the subjective experience of visual interactions with energy infrastructure. Grounded in empirical data gathered over a year in the Orkney Islands, it utilizes participatory photography and photo-elicitation to capture local perspectives. This offers an alternative approach to researching energy transitions in rural landscapes. The findings emphasise the complexities of living with localised energy development at an individual level, highlighting dilemmas, challenges, and opportunities. Integrating individual visual perspectives into future planning remains a challenge, yet individuals often develop unique strategies to coexist with energy infrastructure in rapidly changing landscapes. Engaging with local stakeholders through (visual) ethnographic research can reveal diverse perspectives, contributing to the understanding of the impact of energy transitions in rural communities such as the Orkney Islands.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003104/pdfft?md5=a0e64b6b41ef9b5c3dada801eaecb8bb&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624003104-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003104\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Altered landscapes of a post‑carbon future: Visual response imaginaries as experiences of energy infrastructure in the Orkney Islands
This article critiques the prevailing future-oriented collective visions often used in energy research, emphasizing the need for ethnographic examination of individual interpretations and responses to energy transitions. It explores how individuals coexist with evolving energy landscapes, particularly in rural areas. Despite recommendations for qualitative research on energy aesthetics, there is a gap in understanding of the experiential, visual elements of energy transitions. Studies predominantly prioritize quantifiable preferences over subjective experiences. Drawing a distinction between aesthetics and visuality, it delves into the subjective experience of visual interactions with energy infrastructure. Grounded in empirical data gathered over a year in the Orkney Islands, it utilizes participatory photography and photo-elicitation to capture local perspectives. This offers an alternative approach to researching energy transitions in rural landscapes. The findings emphasise the complexities of living with localised energy development at an individual level, highlighting dilemmas, challenges, and opportunities. Integrating individual visual perspectives into future planning remains a challenge, yet individuals often develop unique strategies to coexist with energy infrastructure in rapidly changing landscapes. Engaging with local stakeholders through (visual) ethnographic research can reveal diverse perspectives, contributing to the understanding of the impact of energy transitions in rural communities such as the Orkney Islands.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.