估算名义封存项目垂直井二氧化碳注入率的工作流程

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104216
Roland Okwen, Richard Dessenberger
{"title":"估算名义封存项目垂直井二氧化碳注入率的工作流程","authors":"Roland Okwen,&nbsp;Richard Dessenberger","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A workflow that considers regulatory and technical constraints applicable to subsurface CO<strong><sub>2</sub></strong> injection projects was developed to determine fluid injection rates accurately. The constraints considered include, but are not limited to, maximum injection bottomhole pressure, maximum injection pressure at the surface or wellhead pressure, and threshold vibration velocity. The workflow was developed and tested using a reservoir model developed from site characterization data of an Illinois Basin CarbonSAFE Phase II notional storage project. The Nexus® reservoir simulation software suite and the Peng-Robinson equation-of-state were used to perform compositional dynamic simulations. Reservoir modeling results indicated that (1) the regulated and technically feasible CO<strong><sub>2</sub></strong> injection rate of a vertical well is predetermined by the most stringent parameter amongst maximum bottomhole pressure, maximum wellhead (surface injection) pressure, and threshold vibration velocity constraints; (2) the threshold vibrational velocity constraint predetermines CO<sub>2</sub> injection rate for high-permeability injection zones; and (3) the most stringent constraint for low-permeability injection zones could be either the maximum bottomhole pressure or the maximum wellhead pressure. However, the injection rate may be further reduced if faults or hydraulically conductive fractures are present within the injection zone and adjacent formations because the pressure required to reactivate the faults may be lower than maximum injection bottomhole pressure, maximum wellhead pressure, and vibrational velocity constraints.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 104216"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001592/pdfft?md5=1a43e08c354901fa7d246b0523d53c2b&pid=1-s2.0-S1750583624001592-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A workflow for estimating the CO2 injection rate of a vertical well in a notional storage project\",\"authors\":\"Roland Okwen,&nbsp;Richard Dessenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A workflow that considers regulatory and technical constraints applicable to subsurface CO<strong><sub>2</sub></strong> injection projects was developed to determine fluid injection rates accurately. The constraints considered include, but are not limited to, maximum injection bottomhole pressure, maximum injection pressure at the surface or wellhead pressure, and threshold vibration velocity. The workflow was developed and tested using a reservoir model developed from site characterization data of an Illinois Basin CarbonSAFE Phase II notional storage project. The Nexus® reservoir simulation software suite and the Peng-Robinson equation-of-state were used to perform compositional dynamic simulations. Reservoir modeling results indicated that (1) the regulated and technically feasible CO<strong><sub>2</sub></strong> injection rate of a vertical well is predetermined by the most stringent parameter amongst maximum bottomhole pressure, maximum wellhead (surface injection) pressure, and threshold vibration velocity constraints; (2) the threshold vibrational velocity constraint predetermines CO<sub>2</sub> injection rate for high-permeability injection zones; and (3) the most stringent constraint for low-permeability injection zones could be either the maximum bottomhole pressure or the maximum wellhead pressure. However, the injection rate may be further reduced if faults or hydraulically conductive fractures are present within the injection zone and adjacent formations because the pressure required to reactivate the faults may be lower than maximum injection bottomhole pressure, maximum wellhead pressure, and vibrational velocity constraints.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001592/pdfft?md5=1a43e08c354901fa7d246b0523d53c2b&pid=1-s2.0-S1750583624001592-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001592\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001592","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为准确确定流体注入率,我们开发了一个工作流程,该流程考虑了适用于地下二氧化碳注入项目的法规和技术限制。考虑的限制因素包括但不限于最大注入井底压力、地表最大注入压力或井口压力以及阈值振动速度。该工作流程的开发和测试使用了根据伊利诺斯盆地 CarbonSAFE 第二阶段名义封存项目的现场特征数据开发的储层模型。使用 Nexus® 储层模拟软件套件和 Peng-Robinson 状态方程进行成分动态模拟。储层建模结果表明:(1) 垂直井的规范和技术上可行的二氧化碳注入率由最大井底压力、最大井口(地面注入)压力和阈值振动速度约束中最严格的参数预先决定;(2) 对于高渗透率注入区,阈值振动速度约束预先决定了二氧化碳注入率;(3) 对于低渗透率注入区,最严格的约束可以是最大井底压力或最大井口压力。然而,如果注入区和邻近地层中存在断层或水力传导裂缝,注入率可能会进一步降低,因为重新激活断层所需的压力可能低于最大注入井底压力、最大井口压力和振动速度约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A workflow for estimating the CO2 injection rate of a vertical well in a notional storage project

A workflow that considers regulatory and technical constraints applicable to subsurface CO2 injection projects was developed to determine fluid injection rates accurately. The constraints considered include, but are not limited to, maximum injection bottomhole pressure, maximum injection pressure at the surface or wellhead pressure, and threshold vibration velocity. The workflow was developed and tested using a reservoir model developed from site characterization data of an Illinois Basin CarbonSAFE Phase II notional storage project. The Nexus® reservoir simulation software suite and the Peng-Robinson equation-of-state were used to perform compositional dynamic simulations. Reservoir modeling results indicated that (1) the regulated and technically feasible CO2 injection rate of a vertical well is predetermined by the most stringent parameter amongst maximum bottomhole pressure, maximum wellhead (surface injection) pressure, and threshold vibration velocity constraints; (2) the threshold vibrational velocity constraint predetermines CO2 injection rate for high-permeability injection zones; and (3) the most stringent constraint for low-permeability injection zones could be either the maximum bottomhole pressure or the maximum wellhead pressure. However, the injection rate may be further reduced if faults or hydraulically conductive fractures are present within the injection zone and adjacent formations because the pressure required to reactivate the faults may be lower than maximum injection bottomhole pressure, maximum wellhead pressure, and vibrational velocity constraints.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
期刊最新文献
Putting the genie back in the bottle: Decarbonizing petroleum with direct air capture and enhanced oil recovery A conceptual evaluation of the use of Ca(OH)2 for attaining carbon capture rates of 99% in the calcium looping process Determining the dominant factors controlling mineralization in three-dimensional fracture networks Conceptual design and evaluation of membrane gas separation-based CO2 recovery unit for CO2 electrolyzers employing anion exchange membranes Enhanced cation release via acid pretreatment for gigaton-scale geologic CO2 sequestration in basalt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1