COVID-19 大流行期间和之后家长对疫苗的犹豫不决和对流感疫苗类型的偏好

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Communications medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1038/s43856-024-00585-w
Jiehu Yuan, Lan Li, Meihong Dong, Hau Chi So, Benjamin J. Cowing, Dennis Kai Ming Ip, Qiuyan Liao
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行期间和之后家长对疫苗的犹豫不决和对流感疫苗类型的偏好","authors":"Jiehu Yuan, Lan Li, Meihong Dong, Hau Chi So, Benjamin J. Cowing, Dennis Kai Ming Ip, Qiuyan Liao","doi":"10.1038/s43856-024-00585-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seasonal influenza vaccine (SIV) greatly reduces disease burden among school-aged children, yet parental vaccine hesitancy remains a persistent challenge. Two types of SIV are available for children in Hong Kong and other locations: inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV), administered through intramuscular injection, and live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), administered via nasal spray. We aimed to understand how vaccine hesitancy shaped parental preference for LAIV versus IIV, particularly amidst important public health events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the massive rollout of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns. We employed a concurrent mixed-methods design. The quantitative part involves longitudinal surveys spanning three years, from pre-pandemic to post-pandemic periods, tracking parental vaccine hesitancy and preference for SIV types. The qualitative part involves 48 in-depth interviews, providing insights into parental preference for SIV types, underlying reasons, and related values. Our quantitative analyses show an overall increase in parental vaccine hesitancy and preference for LAIV over IIV after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and especially after the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Further logistic regression modelling based on the cohort data shows that higher vaccine hesitancy, coupled with the COVID-19 vaccination campaign rollout, predicts a greater preference for LAIV over IIV. The qualitative analysis complements these results, highlighting that LAIV’s non-invasive nature aligns with parental values of prioritizing natural immunity and concerns about overmedication, leading to a more acceptable attitude towards LAIV. Leveraging the higher acceptability of LAIV compared to IIV among parents with high vaccine hesitancy could promote childhood vaccination uptake. We examined how parents’ concerns about vaccines and major public health events affected their preference for different types of seasonal influenza vaccines for children. Currently, children can receive either an injected vaccine or a nasal-spray vaccine. We tracked parental vaccine hesitancy and their preferences for different types of vaccines over three years covering a period before the COVID-19 pandemic and a period during the pandemic. Parents became more hesitant about seasonal influenza vaccines for children after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. Higher vaccine hesitancy and the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines predicted a greater preference for nasal-spray vaccines for children among parents. Parents preferred the non-invasive nature of the nasal-spray vaccines and were concerned about overmedication, particularly vaccines that were administered via injection. We suggest that the nasal-spray vaccines could be one option offered to address high parental vaccine hesitancy. Yuan et. al examine how parental vaccine hesitancy and the rollout of COVID-19 vaccination programs affected preferences for the type of childhood seasonal influenza vaccines. Results provide insights for future vaccination programs by examining reasoning behind parental decisions.","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00585-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental vaccine hesitancy and influenza vaccine type preferences during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Jiehu Yuan, Lan Li, Meihong Dong, Hau Chi So, Benjamin J. Cowing, Dennis Kai Ming Ip, Qiuyan Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43856-024-00585-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Seasonal influenza vaccine (SIV) greatly reduces disease burden among school-aged children, yet parental vaccine hesitancy remains a persistent challenge. Two types of SIV are available for children in Hong Kong and other locations: inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV), administered through intramuscular injection, and live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), administered via nasal spray. We aimed to understand how vaccine hesitancy shaped parental preference for LAIV versus IIV, particularly amidst important public health events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the massive rollout of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns. We employed a concurrent mixed-methods design. The quantitative part involves longitudinal surveys spanning three years, from pre-pandemic to post-pandemic periods, tracking parental vaccine hesitancy and preference for SIV types. The qualitative part involves 48 in-depth interviews, providing insights into parental preference for SIV types, underlying reasons, and related values. Our quantitative analyses show an overall increase in parental vaccine hesitancy and preference for LAIV over IIV after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and especially after the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Further logistic regression modelling based on the cohort data shows that higher vaccine hesitancy, coupled with the COVID-19 vaccination campaign rollout, predicts a greater preference for LAIV over IIV. The qualitative analysis complements these results, highlighting that LAIV’s non-invasive nature aligns with parental values of prioritizing natural immunity and concerns about overmedication, leading to a more acceptable attitude towards LAIV. Leveraging the higher acceptability of LAIV compared to IIV among parents with high vaccine hesitancy could promote childhood vaccination uptake. We examined how parents’ concerns about vaccines and major public health events affected their preference for different types of seasonal influenza vaccines for children. Currently, children can receive either an injected vaccine or a nasal-spray vaccine. We tracked parental vaccine hesitancy and their preferences for different types of vaccines over three years covering a period before the COVID-19 pandemic and a period during the pandemic. Parents became more hesitant about seasonal influenza vaccines for children after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. Higher vaccine hesitancy and the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines predicted a greater preference for nasal-spray vaccines for children among parents. Parents preferred the non-invasive nature of the nasal-spray vaccines and were concerned about overmedication, particularly vaccines that were administered via injection. We suggest that the nasal-spray vaccines could be one option offered to address high parental vaccine hesitancy. Yuan et. al examine how parental vaccine hesitancy and the rollout of COVID-19 vaccination programs affected preferences for the type of childhood seasonal influenza vaccines. Results provide insights for future vaccination programs by examining reasoning behind parental decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00585-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00585-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00585-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

接种季节性流感疫苗 (SIV) 可大大减轻学龄儿童的疾病负担,但家长对接种疫苗犹豫不决仍是一个长期存在的挑战。香港和其他地区的儿童可接种两种季节性流感疫苗:通过肌肉注射接种的灭活流感疫苗(IIV)和通过鼻腔喷雾接种的减毒流感活疫苗(LAIV)。我们旨在了解疫苗犹豫不决如何影响家长对 LAIV 和 IIV 的偏好,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行和大规模推广 COVID-19 疫苗接种活动等重要公共卫生事件中。我们采用了并行混合方法设计。定量部分包括纵向调查,时间跨度为三年,从大流行前到大流行后,追踪父母对疫苗的犹豫不决以及对 SIV 类型的偏好。定性部分包括 48 次深入访谈,深入了解家长对 SIV 类型的偏好、根本原因和相关价值观。我们的定量分析显示,在 COVID-19 大流行开始后,尤其是在 COVID-19 疫苗接种活动开始后,家长对疫苗的犹豫不决程度以及对 LAIV 而非 IIV 的偏好程度总体有所上升。基于队列数据的进一步逻辑回归模型显示,较高的疫苗犹豫度加上 COVID-19 疫苗接种活动的推出,预示着更多人倾向于 LAIV 而不是 IIV。定性分析补充了这些结果,强调了LAIV的非侵入性与父母优先考虑自然免疫的价值观以及对过度医疗的担忧相一致,从而使父母对LAIV持更可接受的态度。与 IIV 相比,LAIV 在疫苗接种犹豫不决的家长中具有更高的可接受性,利用这一点可以促进儿童疫苗接种率的提高。我们研究了家长对疫苗和重大公共卫生事件的担忧如何影响他们对不同类型儿童季节性流感疫苗的偏好。目前,儿童可以接种注射疫苗或鼻喷疫苗。我们在 COVID-19 大流行之前和大流行期间的三年中跟踪了家长对疫苗的犹豫态度以及他们对不同类型疫苗的偏好。在 COVID-19 大流行开始和 COVID-19 疫苗推出后,家长对儿童接种季节性流感疫苗变得更加犹豫不决。较高的疫苗犹豫度和 COVID-19 疫苗的推广预示着家长们更倾向于为儿童接种鼻腔喷雾疫苗。家长们更喜欢鼻腔喷雾疫苗的非侵入性,并担心过度医疗,尤其是通过注射的疫苗。我们建议,鼻腔喷雾疫苗可作为解决家长对疫苗犹豫不决问题的一种选择。Yuan等人研究了家长对疫苗的犹豫不决和COVID-19疫苗接种计划的推出如何影响对儿童季节性流感疫苗类型的偏好。研究结果通过考察家长决定背后的原因,为未来的疫苗接种计划提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parental vaccine hesitancy and influenza vaccine type preferences during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic
Seasonal influenza vaccine (SIV) greatly reduces disease burden among school-aged children, yet parental vaccine hesitancy remains a persistent challenge. Two types of SIV are available for children in Hong Kong and other locations: inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV), administered through intramuscular injection, and live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), administered via nasal spray. We aimed to understand how vaccine hesitancy shaped parental preference for LAIV versus IIV, particularly amidst important public health events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the massive rollout of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns. We employed a concurrent mixed-methods design. The quantitative part involves longitudinal surveys spanning three years, from pre-pandemic to post-pandemic periods, tracking parental vaccine hesitancy and preference for SIV types. The qualitative part involves 48 in-depth interviews, providing insights into parental preference for SIV types, underlying reasons, and related values. Our quantitative analyses show an overall increase in parental vaccine hesitancy and preference for LAIV over IIV after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and especially after the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Further logistic regression modelling based on the cohort data shows that higher vaccine hesitancy, coupled with the COVID-19 vaccination campaign rollout, predicts a greater preference for LAIV over IIV. The qualitative analysis complements these results, highlighting that LAIV’s non-invasive nature aligns with parental values of prioritizing natural immunity and concerns about overmedication, leading to a more acceptable attitude towards LAIV. Leveraging the higher acceptability of LAIV compared to IIV among parents with high vaccine hesitancy could promote childhood vaccination uptake. We examined how parents’ concerns about vaccines and major public health events affected their preference for different types of seasonal influenza vaccines for children. Currently, children can receive either an injected vaccine or a nasal-spray vaccine. We tracked parental vaccine hesitancy and their preferences for different types of vaccines over three years covering a period before the COVID-19 pandemic and a period during the pandemic. Parents became more hesitant about seasonal influenza vaccines for children after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines. Higher vaccine hesitancy and the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines predicted a greater preference for nasal-spray vaccines for children among parents. Parents preferred the non-invasive nature of the nasal-spray vaccines and were concerned about overmedication, particularly vaccines that were administered via injection. We suggest that the nasal-spray vaccines could be one option offered to address high parental vaccine hesitancy. Yuan et. al examine how parental vaccine hesitancy and the rollout of COVID-19 vaccination programs affected preferences for the type of childhood seasonal influenza vaccines. Results provide insights for future vaccination programs by examining reasoning behind parental decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Correction: A cross-sectional and population-based study from primary care on post-COVID-19 conditions in non-hospitalized patients An integrated empirical and computational study to decipher help-seeking behaviors and vocal stigma Survey of the risk behaviors and mental health of adolescents in Gabon risky behaviors and vulnerability of adolescent Africans Inclusiveness of the All of Us Research Program improves polygenic risk scores and fosters genomic medicine for all Recommendations for the equitable integration of digital health interventions across the HIV care cascade
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1