{"title":"评估纵向随机对照试验中治疗启动指南的异质性","authors":"Hyunkeun Ryan Cho , Seonjin Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2024.106226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Treatment initiation guidelines are essential in healthcare, dictating when patients begin therapy. These guidelines are typically assessed through randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to measure their average effect on a population. However, this method may not fully account for patient heterogeneity. We introduce a refined analysis methodology that accounts for diverse times to treatment initiation (TTI) arising from these guidelines. We offer a more detailed perspective on the guidelines’ impact by analyzing homogeneous subpopulations based on their TTI. We develop a longitudinal regression model with smooth time functions to capture dynamic changes in average guideline effects on subpopulations (AGES). A unique weighting mechanism creates pseudo-subpopulations from RCT data, enabling consistent and precise estimation of smooth functions. The efficacy of our approach is validated through theoretical and numerical studies, underscoring its capacity to provide insightful statistical inferences. We exemplify the utility of our methodology by applying it to an RCT of the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline for adults with HIV. This analysis promises to enhance the evaluation of treatment initiation guidelines, leading to more personalized and efficient patient care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50039,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","volume":"235 ","pages":"Article 106226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing heterogeneity in treatment initiation guidelines in longitudinal randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Hyunkeun Ryan Cho , Seonjin Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jspi.2024.106226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Treatment initiation guidelines are essential in healthcare, dictating when patients begin therapy. These guidelines are typically assessed through randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to measure their average effect on a population. However, this method may not fully account for patient heterogeneity. We introduce a refined analysis methodology that accounts for diverse times to treatment initiation (TTI) arising from these guidelines. We offer a more detailed perspective on the guidelines’ impact by analyzing homogeneous subpopulations based on their TTI. We develop a longitudinal regression model with smooth time functions to capture dynamic changes in average guideline effects on subpopulations (AGES). A unique weighting mechanism creates pseudo-subpopulations from RCT data, enabling consistent and precise estimation of smooth functions. The efficacy of our approach is validated through theoretical and numerical studies, underscoring its capacity to provide insightful statistical inferences. We exemplify the utility of our methodology by applying it to an RCT of the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline for adults with HIV. This analysis promises to enhance the evaluation of treatment initiation guidelines, leading to more personalized and efficient patient care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference\",\"volume\":\"235 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378375824000831\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378375824000831","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing heterogeneity in treatment initiation guidelines in longitudinal randomized controlled trials
Treatment initiation guidelines are essential in healthcare, dictating when patients begin therapy. These guidelines are typically assessed through randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to measure their average effect on a population. However, this method may not fully account for patient heterogeneity. We introduce a refined analysis methodology that accounts for diverse times to treatment initiation (TTI) arising from these guidelines. We offer a more detailed perspective on the guidelines’ impact by analyzing homogeneous subpopulations based on their TTI. We develop a longitudinal regression model with smooth time functions to capture dynamic changes in average guideline effects on subpopulations (AGES). A unique weighting mechanism creates pseudo-subpopulations from RCT data, enabling consistent and precise estimation of smooth functions. The efficacy of our approach is validated through theoretical and numerical studies, underscoring its capacity to provide insightful statistical inferences. We exemplify the utility of our methodology by applying it to an RCT of the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline for adults with HIV. This analysis promises to enhance the evaluation of treatment initiation guidelines, leading to more personalized and efficient patient care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference offers itself as a multifaceted and all-inclusive bridge between classical aspects of statistics and probability, and the emerging interdisciplinary aspects that have a potential of revolutionizing the subject. While we maintain our traditional strength in statistical inference, design, classical probability, and large sample methods, we also have a far more inclusive and broadened scope to keep up with the new problems that confront us as statisticians, mathematicians, and scientists.
We publish high quality articles in all branches of statistics, probability, discrete mathematics, machine learning, and bioinformatics. We also especially welcome well written and up to date review articles on fundamental themes of statistics, probability, machine learning, and general biostatistics. Thoughtful letters to the editors, interesting problems in need of a solution, and short notes carrying an element of elegance or beauty are equally welcome.