Adoption and effect of sealants for occlusal noncavitated caries in a large dental network in the United States.

Introduction: Dental sealants applied to occlusal pit-and-fissure surfaces have been shown to prevent caries and arrest occlusal non-cavitated carious lesions (NCCLs). The American Dental Association (ADA) recommends that oral healthcare providers apply sealants on occlusal NCCLs. Though the evidence is clear that sealants are effective, few studies have examined the adoption of the ADA guideline by dentists and the duration of protection provided by sealants in a large real world setting.

Methods: This study used observational electronic health record (EHR) data from a network of dental clinics to follow teeth over a two year time period from when they were diagnosed as having an occlusal NCCL until either they were treated with a restoration or the time period ended with no restoration. The objectives of the study were to determine: 1) the degree to which dentists adopted the guideline, 2) whether the duration of protection was different for teeth that received a sealant from teeth that did not receive a sealant, and 3) whether dentists' experience placing sealants was associated with the duration of protection.

Results: Overall, there were 7,299 teeth in the sample. Of those, dentists restored 591 teeth and applied sealants on 164. The sealant application rate for eligible teeth was 2.2%. Sealant application was associated with provider, with 1.9% of providers placing more than half of the sealants. By the end of the observation period, the proportion of teeth progressing to restorations was 8.2% for teeth that had not received a sealant and 3.0% for teeth that had received one (RR=0.37; 95% CI (0.16-0.88); p=0.02) Multilevel survival analysis showed that teeth that had not received a sealant were restored sooner than teeth that had received a sealant (aHR=0.11; 95% CI 0.03 - 0.36; p<.01). Overall, teeth that received a sealant had an 89% reduced hazard of restoration within two years compared with teeth that did not receive sealants.

Conclusion: This study found that by arresting decay, the presence of sealants led to fewer restorations and delayed restorations compared with teeth not receiving a sealant or restoration in the two years following diagnosis of occlusal NCCL in clinical settings.