ASCO 国内质量计划。

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1200/GO.24.00058
Issam Makhoul, Steve Power, Catherine Smith, Traci Niece, Deirdre O'Mahony
{"title":"ASCO 国内质量计划。","authors":"Issam Makhoul, Steve Power, Catherine Smith, Traci Niece, Deirdre O'Mahony","doi":"10.1200/GO.24.00058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A growing sense of the need to define good-quality cancer care has emerged in the past decade of the 20th century. The goals were to assess, improve, and reward quality. Animated debates between cancer care delivery academic and community organizations, governmental agencies, and insurance companies have led to multiple initiatives and pilot projects. ASCO was on the cutting edge of quality in oncology movement. We can define three phases, overlapping rather than sequential, in ASCO's journey. The first phase was generating definitions of good-quality care characterized by the publication of ASCO guidelines. The second phase was the creation of the tools to measure the implementation of standards of care with the creation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI). The third phase was the launch of a comprehensive approach to cancer care quality as illustrated by QOPI Certification, then the more complete iteration, ASCO Certified Program. The latter is the most elaborate program to define quality from the patient and health care providers' perspective on one hand and governmental agencies and insurance providers' perspective on the other. Since the publication of the Ensuring Quality Cancer Care Report in 1998 to the ASCO Certified in 2023, a quarter century has elapsed. ASCO did not operate in a vacuum. Through collaborative efforts, reacting to and interacting with various players, it has advocated for positive change. During this period, ASCO has led the movement of quality in oncology intelligently and with the upmost sense of responsibility toward the patients, health care professionals, and society at large. While many of these efforts began domestically, their reach is extending globally through research, education, and the promotion of equitable care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ASCO Domestic Quality Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Issam Makhoul, Steve Power, Catherine Smith, Traci Niece, Deirdre O'Mahony\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/GO.24.00058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A growing sense of the need to define good-quality cancer care has emerged in the past decade of the 20th century. The goals were to assess, improve, and reward quality. Animated debates between cancer care delivery academic and community organizations, governmental agencies, and insurance companies have led to multiple initiatives and pilot projects. ASCO was on the cutting edge of quality in oncology movement. We can define three phases, overlapping rather than sequential, in ASCO's journey. The first phase was generating definitions of good-quality care characterized by the publication of ASCO guidelines. The second phase was the creation of the tools to measure the implementation of standards of care with the creation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI). The third phase was the launch of a comprehensive approach to cancer care quality as illustrated by QOPI Certification, then the more complete iteration, ASCO Certified Program. The latter is the most elaborate program to define quality from the patient and health care providers' perspective on one hand and governmental agencies and insurance providers' perspective on the other. Since the publication of the Ensuring Quality Cancer Care Report in 1998 to the ASCO Certified in 2023, a quarter century has elapsed. ASCO did not operate in a vacuum. Through collaborative efforts, reacting to and interacting with various players, it has advocated for positive change. During this period, ASCO has led the movement of quality in oncology intelligently and with the upmost sense of responsibility toward the patients, health care professionals, and society at large. While many of these efforts began domestically, their reach is extending globally through research, education, and the promotion of equitable care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.24.00058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.24.00058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在 20 世纪的过去十年中,人们越来越意识到需要定义高质量的癌症治疗。其目标是评估、改进和奖励优质医疗服务。提供癌症治疗的学术和社区组织、政府机构和保险公司之间的激烈争论促成了多项倡议和试点项目。ASCO 站在了肿瘤治疗质量运动的最前沿。我们可以将 ASCO 的发展历程划分为三个阶段,这三个阶段相互重叠,而非先后顺序。第一阶段是制定优质护理的定义,其特点是发布 ASCO 指南。第二阶段是通过创建优质肿瘤治疗实践计划 (QOPI),创建衡量治疗标准实施情况的工具。第三阶段是推出全面的癌症护理质量方法,如 QOPI 认证,然后是更完整的迭代,即 ASCO 认证计划。后者是从患者和医疗服务提供者的角度,以及政府机构和保险提供者的角度来定义质量的最详尽计划。从 1998 年发布《确保癌症治疗质量报告》到 2023 年通过 ASCO 认证,已经过去了四分之一个世纪。ASCO 并非在真空中运作。通过共同努力,对各种参与者作出反应并与之互动,它倡导了积极的变革。在此期间,ASCO 秉承对患者、医护人员和整个社会的高度责任感,明智地领导了肿瘤质量运动。虽然其中许多工作始于国内,但通过研究、教育和促进公平护理,其影响范围已扩展至全球。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ASCO Domestic Quality Programs.

A growing sense of the need to define good-quality cancer care has emerged in the past decade of the 20th century. The goals were to assess, improve, and reward quality. Animated debates between cancer care delivery academic and community organizations, governmental agencies, and insurance companies have led to multiple initiatives and pilot projects. ASCO was on the cutting edge of quality in oncology movement. We can define three phases, overlapping rather than sequential, in ASCO's journey. The first phase was generating definitions of good-quality care characterized by the publication of ASCO guidelines. The second phase was the creation of the tools to measure the implementation of standards of care with the creation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI). The third phase was the launch of a comprehensive approach to cancer care quality as illustrated by QOPI Certification, then the more complete iteration, ASCO Certified Program. The latter is the most elaborate program to define quality from the patient and health care providers' perspective on one hand and governmental agencies and insurance providers' perspective on the other. Since the publication of the Ensuring Quality Cancer Care Report in 1998 to the ASCO Certified in 2023, a quarter century has elapsed. ASCO did not operate in a vacuum. Through collaborative efforts, reacting to and interacting with various players, it has advocated for positive change. During this period, ASCO has led the movement of quality in oncology intelligently and with the upmost sense of responsibility toward the patients, health care professionals, and society at large. While many of these efforts began domestically, their reach is extending globally through research, education, and the promotion of equitable care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beliefs on Causes of Cancer in the General Population, and the Association With Risk Perception and Lifestyle in a Multiethnic Setting. Intersectionality Between Country, Gender and Funding in Authorship for Phase III Trials Presented at the ASCO Annual Meeting 2022. Barriers to Follow-Up of an Abnormal Clinical Breast Examination in Uttar Pradesh, India: A Qualitative Study. Breast Cancer and Risk of Depression: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study Among Women With and Without Breast Cancer in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Building an Effective International Medical Evacuation Program for Ukrainian Patients With Cancer Amid Prolonged Military Conflict.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1