平衡锻炼干预对多发性硬化症患者平衡相关表现的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1177/15459683241273402
Andreas Wallin, Sverker Johansson, John Brincks, Ulrik Dalgas, Erika Franzén, Jacob Callesen
{"title":"平衡锻炼干预对多发性硬化症患者平衡相关表现的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。","authors":"Andreas Wallin, Sverker Johansson, John Brincks, Ulrik Dalgas, Erika Franzén, Jacob Callesen","doi":"10.1177/15459683241273402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Balance training covers a range of different modalities and complexity levels for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). When evaluating the effects of balance training across different kinds of interventions, determination of the specific intervention content that predict effects are needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of balance training on gait and dynamic balance outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials involving people with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score ≤7.5) where at least 50% of the intervention targeted balance control were included. Interventions were categorized based on training types. Risk-of-bias was assessed using the Tool for the Assessment of Study Quality and Reporting in Exercise (TESTEX).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 included studies involved 902 people with MS (EDSS range from 0 to 7.5). Interventions evaluated with a balance composite score or a mobility test showed a moderate effect size (ES = 0.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.18 to 0.74]; <i>p</i> < .01) and a small overall ES (ES = 0.19 [95% CI = 0.01-0.36]; <i>p</i> = .04), respectively, across different training types. Stepping and gait speed outcomes showed no effect. Cognitive dual-task training showed a significant effect (ES = 0.81 [95% CI = 0.24 to 1.37]) on subgroup level, when evaluated with a mobility outcome measure. The median TESTEX score on study quality and reporting was 11 (maximum score = 15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improvements of balance were found across interventions when measured by balance composite scores and mobility tests, but not when measured by stepping or gait speed outcomes. Large training volume was positively associated with effect on balance. A definition of intensity in balance training is needed for evaluation of its impact on the effect of balance interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"775-790"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Balance Exercise Interventions on Balance-Related Performance in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Wallin, Sverker Johansson, John Brincks, Ulrik Dalgas, Erika Franzén, Jacob Callesen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683241273402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Balance training covers a range of different modalities and complexity levels for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). When evaluating the effects of balance training across different kinds of interventions, determination of the specific intervention content that predict effects are needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of balance training on gait and dynamic balance outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials involving people with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score ≤7.5) where at least 50% of the intervention targeted balance control were included. Interventions were categorized based on training types. Risk-of-bias was assessed using the Tool for the Assessment of Study Quality and Reporting in Exercise (TESTEX).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 included studies involved 902 people with MS (EDSS range from 0 to 7.5). Interventions evaluated with a balance composite score or a mobility test showed a moderate effect size (ES = 0.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.18 to 0.74]; <i>p</i> < .01) and a small overall ES (ES = 0.19 [95% CI = 0.01-0.36]; <i>p</i> = .04), respectively, across different training types. Stepping and gait speed outcomes showed no effect. Cognitive dual-task training showed a significant effect (ES = 0.81 [95% CI = 0.24 to 1.37]) on subgroup level, when evaluated with a mobility outcome measure. The median TESTEX score on study quality and reporting was 11 (maximum score = 15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improvements of balance were found across interventions when measured by balance composite scores and mobility tests, but not when measured by stepping or gait speed outcomes. Large training volume was positively associated with effect on balance. A definition of intensity in balance training is needed for evaluation of its impact on the effect of balance interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"775-790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683241273402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683241273402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:针对多发性硬化症(MS)患者的平衡训练包括一系列不同的模式和复杂程度。在评估不同类型干预措施的平衡训练效果时,需要确定能预测效果的具体干预内容:调查平衡训练对步态和动态平衡结果的影响:方法:系统检索了四个数据库。纳入的随机对照试验涉及多发性硬化症患者(扩展残疾状况量表[EDSS]评分≤7.5分),其中至少50%的干预以平衡控制为目标。干预措施根据训练类型进行分类。使用运动研究质量和报告评估工具(TESTEX)对偏倚风险进行评估:共纳入 18 项研究,涉及 902 名多发性硬化症患者(EDSS 范围从 0 到 7.5)。在不同的训练类型中,以平衡综合评分或活动能力测试评估的干预措施分别显示出中等程度的效应大小(ES = 0.46 [95% 置信区间 (CI) = 0.18 至 0.74];p p = .04)。步态和步速结果显示没有影响。用活动能力结果指标进行评估时,认知性双任务训练对亚组水平有显著影响(ES = 0.81 [95% CI = 0.24 至 1.37])。研究质量和报告的TESTEX评分中位数为11分(最高分=15分):结论:通过平衡综合评分和活动能力测试来衡量,不同干预措施的平衡能力均有改善,但通过步速或步态速度来衡量,平衡能力没有改善。大训练量与平衡效果呈正相关。需要对平衡训练强度进行定义,以评估其对平衡干预效果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Balance Exercise Interventions on Balance-Related Performance in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: Balance training covers a range of different modalities and complexity levels for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). When evaluating the effects of balance training across different kinds of interventions, determination of the specific intervention content that predict effects are needed.

Objective: To investigate the effects of balance training on gait and dynamic balance outcomes.

Methods: Four databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials involving people with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score ≤7.5) where at least 50% of the intervention targeted balance control were included. Interventions were categorized based on training types. Risk-of-bias was assessed using the Tool for the Assessment of Study Quality and Reporting in Exercise (TESTEX).

Results: A total of 18 included studies involved 902 people with MS (EDSS range from 0 to 7.5). Interventions evaluated with a balance composite score or a mobility test showed a moderate effect size (ES = 0.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.18 to 0.74]; p < .01) and a small overall ES (ES = 0.19 [95% CI = 0.01-0.36]; p = .04), respectively, across different training types. Stepping and gait speed outcomes showed no effect. Cognitive dual-task training showed a significant effect (ES = 0.81 [95% CI = 0.24 to 1.37]) on subgroup level, when evaluated with a mobility outcome measure. The median TESTEX score on study quality and reporting was 11 (maximum score = 15).

Conclusions: Improvements of balance were found across interventions when measured by balance composite scores and mobility tests, but not when measured by stepping or gait speed outcomes. Large training volume was positively associated with effect on balance. A definition of intensity in balance training is needed for evaluation of its impact on the effect of balance interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reinforcement Learning is Impaired in the Sub-acute Post-stroke Period. Post-Stroke Recovery in Relation to Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons and Perineuronal Nets. Mapping Trajectories of Gait Recovery in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation. Exploring Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Effects on Physical Outcomes in People With Parkinson's Disease: An Umbrella Evidence Mapping Review With Meta-analyses. Acute and Longitudinal Effects of Concussion on Reactive Balance in Collegiate Athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1