荧光显微镜图像语义分割中深度神经网络鲁棒性的基准测试。

IF 2.9 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS BMC Bioinformatics Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1186/s12859-024-05894-4
Liqun Zhong, Lingrui Li, Ge Yang
{"title":"荧光显微镜图像语义分割中深度神经网络鲁棒性的基准测试。","authors":"Liqun Zhong, Lingrui Li, Ge Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12859-024-05894-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluorescence microscopy (FM) is an important and widely adopted biological imaging technique. Segmentation is often the first step in quantitative analysis of FM images. Deep neural networks (DNNs) have become the state-of-the-art tools for image segmentation. However, their performance on natural images may collapse under certain image corruptions or adversarial attacks. This poses real risks to their deployment in real-world applications. Although the robustness of DNN models in segmenting natural images has been studied extensively, their robustness in segmenting FM images remains poorly understood RESULTS: To address this deficiency, we have developed an assay that benchmarks robustness of DNN segmentation models using datasets of realistic synthetic 2D FM images with precisely controlled corruptions or adversarial attacks. Using this assay, we have benchmarked robustness of ten representative models such as DeepLab and Vision Transformer. We find that models with good robustness on natural images may perform poorly on FM images. We also find new robustness properties of DNN models and new connections between their corruption robustness and adversarial robustness. To further assess the robustness of the selected models, we have also benchmarked them on real microscopy images of different modalities without using simulated degradation. The results are consistent with those obtained on the realistic synthetic images, confirming the fidelity and reliability of our image synthesis method as well as the effectiveness of our assay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on comprehensive benchmarking experiments, we have found distinct robustness properties of deep neural networks in semantic segmentation of FM images. Based on the findings, we have made specific recommendations on selection and design of robust models for FM image segmentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8958,"journal":{"name":"BMC Bioinformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking robustness of deep neural networks in semantic segmentation of fluorescence microscopy images.\",\"authors\":\"Liqun Zhong, Lingrui Li, Ge Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12859-024-05894-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluorescence microscopy (FM) is an important and widely adopted biological imaging technique. Segmentation is often the first step in quantitative analysis of FM images. Deep neural networks (DNNs) have become the state-of-the-art tools for image segmentation. However, their performance on natural images may collapse under certain image corruptions or adversarial attacks. This poses real risks to their deployment in real-world applications. Although the robustness of DNN models in segmenting natural images has been studied extensively, their robustness in segmenting FM images remains poorly understood RESULTS: To address this deficiency, we have developed an assay that benchmarks robustness of DNN segmentation models using datasets of realistic synthetic 2D FM images with precisely controlled corruptions or adversarial attacks. Using this assay, we have benchmarked robustness of ten representative models such as DeepLab and Vision Transformer. We find that models with good robustness on natural images may perform poorly on FM images. We also find new robustness properties of DNN models and new connections between their corruption robustness and adversarial robustness. To further assess the robustness of the selected models, we have also benchmarked them on real microscopy images of different modalities without using simulated degradation. The results are consistent with those obtained on the realistic synthetic images, confirming the fidelity and reliability of our image synthesis method as well as the effectiveness of our assay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on comprehensive benchmarking experiments, we have found distinct robustness properties of deep neural networks in semantic segmentation of FM images. Based on the findings, we have made specific recommendations on selection and design of robust models for FM image segmentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Bioinformatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334404/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-024-05894-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-024-05894-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:荧光显微镜(FM)是一种重要且被广泛采用的生物成像技术。分割通常是荧光显微图像定量分析的第一步。深度神经网络(DNN)已成为最先进的图像分割工具。然而,它们在自然图像上的性能可能会在某些图像损坏或对抗性攻击下崩溃。这给它们在实际应用中的部署带来了真正的风险。虽然 DNN 模型在分割自然图像时的鲁棒性已得到广泛研究,但它们在分割调频图像时的鲁棒性仍鲜为人知 结果:为解决这一不足,我们开发了一种检测方法,利用具有精确控制的损坏或对抗性攻击的现实合成 2D 调频图像数据集,对 DNN 分割模型的鲁棒性进行基准测试。利用这一检测方法,我们对 DeepLab 和 Vision Transformer 等十个代表性模型的鲁棒性进行了基准测试。我们发现,在自然图像上具有良好鲁棒性的模型,在调频图像上可能表现不佳。我们还发现了 DNN 模型的新鲁棒性特性,以及它们的损坏鲁棒性和对抗鲁棒性之间的新联系。为了进一步评估所选模型的鲁棒性,我们还在不同模式的真实显微图像上对这些模型进行了基准测试,而没有使用模拟退化。结果与在真实合成图像上获得的结果一致,证实了我们图像合成方法的保真度和可靠性,以及我们检测方法的有效性:基于全面的基准实验,我们发现了深度神经网络在调频图像语义分割中的独特鲁棒性。基于这些发现,我们对调频图像分割中鲁棒性模型的选择和设计提出了具体建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benchmarking robustness of deep neural networks in semantic segmentation of fluorescence microscopy images.

Background: Fluorescence microscopy (FM) is an important and widely adopted biological imaging technique. Segmentation is often the first step in quantitative analysis of FM images. Deep neural networks (DNNs) have become the state-of-the-art tools for image segmentation. However, their performance on natural images may collapse under certain image corruptions or adversarial attacks. This poses real risks to their deployment in real-world applications. Although the robustness of DNN models in segmenting natural images has been studied extensively, their robustness in segmenting FM images remains poorly understood RESULTS: To address this deficiency, we have developed an assay that benchmarks robustness of DNN segmentation models using datasets of realistic synthetic 2D FM images with precisely controlled corruptions or adversarial attacks. Using this assay, we have benchmarked robustness of ten representative models such as DeepLab and Vision Transformer. We find that models with good robustness on natural images may perform poorly on FM images. We also find new robustness properties of DNN models and new connections between their corruption robustness and adversarial robustness. To further assess the robustness of the selected models, we have also benchmarked them on real microscopy images of different modalities without using simulated degradation. The results are consistent with those obtained on the realistic synthetic images, confirming the fidelity and reliability of our image synthesis method as well as the effectiveness of our assay.

Conclusions: Based on comprehensive benchmarking experiments, we have found distinct robustness properties of deep neural networks in semantic segmentation of FM images. Based on the findings, we have made specific recommendations on selection and design of robust models for FM image segmentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Bioinformatics
BMC Bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Bioinformatics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the development, testing and novel application of computational and statistical methods for the modeling and analysis of all kinds of biological data, as well as other areas of computational biology. BMC Bioinformatics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.
期刊最新文献
Rare copy number variant analysis in case-control studies using snp array data: a scalable and automated data analysis pipeline. Mining contextually meaningful subgraphs from a vertex-attributed graph. Robust double machine learning model with application to omics data. A mapping-free natural language processing-based technique for sequence search in nanopore long-reads. Closha 2.0: a bio-workflow design system for massive genome data analysis on high performance cluster infrastructure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1