Laura McLaughlin PhD, RN , Suzanne M. Mahon DNS, RN, AOCN, AGN-BC, FAAN , Usa Khemthong MSN, RN
{"title":"针对护士和护理专业学生的基因组教育系统回顾:精准健康时代的基因组教育是否足够?","authors":"Laura McLaughlin PhD, RN , Suzanne M. Mahon DNS, RN, AOCN, AGN-BC, FAAN , Usa Khemthong MSN, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Integration of genomic content into nursing curricula and continuing education is limited.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This systematic review aimed to identify educational strategies to deliver genomics content.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>CINAHL Plus, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus electronic databases were searched from January 1, 2003 through July 6, 2023. The three domains of learning: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor were used to categorize educational outcomes. A narrative approach was used to synthesize the data using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Quality assessment for bias was conducted independently; study quality ranged from fair to poor. No study used a complete psychometrically tested instrument to measure genomic cognitive or affective knowledge; none measured the psychomotor domain.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Effective strategies to deliver genomic education are a priority. Development of reliable and valid instruments for the assessment of educational interventions, including the psychomotor skills needed for practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54705,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Outlook","volume":"72 5","pages":"Article 102266"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of genomic education for nurses and nursing students: Are they sufficient in the era of precision health?\",\"authors\":\"Laura McLaughlin PhD, RN , Suzanne M. Mahon DNS, RN, AOCN, AGN-BC, FAAN , Usa Khemthong MSN, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Integration of genomic content into nursing curricula and continuing education is limited.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This systematic review aimed to identify educational strategies to deliver genomics content.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>CINAHL Plus, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus electronic databases were searched from January 1, 2003 through July 6, 2023. The three domains of learning: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor were used to categorize educational outcomes. A narrative approach was used to synthesize the data using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Quality assessment for bias was conducted independently; study quality ranged from fair to poor. No study used a complete psychometrically tested instrument to measure genomic cognitive or affective knowledge; none measured the psychomotor domain.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Effective strategies to deliver genomic education are a priority. Development of reliable and valid instruments for the assessment of educational interventions, including the psychomotor skills needed for practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"volume\":\"72 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 102266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424001593\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424001593","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
A systematic review of genomic education for nurses and nursing students: Are they sufficient in the era of precision health?
Background
Integration of genomic content into nursing curricula and continuing education is limited.
Purpose
This systematic review aimed to identify educational strategies to deliver genomics content.
Methods
CINAHL Plus, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus electronic databases were searched from January 1, 2003 through July 6, 2023. The three domains of learning: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor were used to categorize educational outcomes. A narrative approach was used to synthesize the data using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
Discussion
Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Quality assessment for bias was conducted independently; study quality ranged from fair to poor. No study used a complete psychometrically tested instrument to measure genomic cognitive or affective knowledge; none measured the psychomotor domain.
Conclusions
Effective strategies to deliver genomic education are a priority. Development of reliable and valid instruments for the assessment of educational interventions, including the psychomotor skills needed for practice.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Outlook, a bimonthly journal, provides innovative ideas for nursing leaders through peer-reviewed articles and timely reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in nursing practice, education, and research, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. Nursing Outlook is the official journal of the American Academy of Nursing and the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science and supports their mission to serve the public and the nursing profession by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. The journal is included in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Journal Citation Reports published by Clarivate Analytics.