针对护士和护理专业学生的基因组教育系统回顾:精准健康时代的基因组教育是否足够?

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing Outlook Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102266
Laura McLaughlin PhD, RN , Suzanne M. Mahon DNS, RN, AOCN, AGN-BC, FAAN , Usa Khemthong MSN, RN
{"title":"针对护士和护理专业学生的基因组教育系统回顾:精准健康时代的基因组教育是否足够?","authors":"Laura McLaughlin PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Suzanne M. Mahon DNS, RN, AOCN, AGN-BC, FAAN ,&nbsp;Usa Khemthong MSN, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Integration of genomic content into nursing curricula and continuing education is limited.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This systematic review aimed to identify educational strategies to deliver genomics content.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>CINAHL Plus, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus electronic databases were searched from January 1, 2003 through July 6, 2023. The three domains of learning: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor were used to categorize educational outcomes. A narrative approach was used to synthesize the data using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Quality assessment for bias was conducted independently; study quality ranged from fair to poor. No study used a complete psychometrically tested instrument to measure genomic cognitive or affective knowledge; none measured the psychomotor domain.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Effective strategies to deliver genomic education are a priority. Development of reliable and valid instruments for the assessment of educational interventions, including the psychomotor skills needed for practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54705,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Outlook","volume":"72 5","pages":"Article 102266"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of genomic education for nurses and nursing students: Are they sufficient in the era of precision health?\",\"authors\":\"Laura McLaughlin PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Suzanne M. Mahon DNS, RN, AOCN, AGN-BC, FAAN ,&nbsp;Usa Khemthong MSN, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Integration of genomic content into nursing curricula and continuing education is limited.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This systematic review aimed to identify educational strategies to deliver genomics content.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>CINAHL Plus, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus electronic databases were searched from January 1, 2003 through July 6, 2023. The three domains of learning: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor were used to categorize educational outcomes. A narrative approach was used to synthesize the data using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Quality assessment for bias was conducted independently; study quality ranged from fair to poor. No study used a complete psychometrically tested instrument to measure genomic cognitive or affective knowledge; none measured the psychomotor domain.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Effective strategies to deliver genomic education are a priority. Development of reliable and valid instruments for the assessment of educational interventions, including the psychomotor skills needed for practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"volume\":\"72 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 102266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Outlook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424001593\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424001593","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景将基因组学内容纳入护理课程和继续教育的情况很有限。目的本系统综述旨在确定提供基因组学内容的教育策略。采用认知、情感和心理运动三个学习领域对教育成果进行分类。讨论十项研究符合纳入标准。对偏差的质量评估是独立进行的;研究质量从一般到较差不等。没有一项研究使用了经过心理测试的完整工具来测量基因组认知或情感知识;没有一项研究测量了精神运动领域。开发可靠有效的工具来评估教育干预措施,包括实践所需的心理运动技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of genomic education for nurses and nursing students: Are they sufficient in the era of precision health?

Background

Integration of genomic content into nursing curricula and continuing education is limited.

Purpose

This systematic review aimed to identify educational strategies to deliver genomics content.

Methods

CINAHL Plus, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus electronic databases were searched from January 1, 2003 through July 6, 2023. The three domains of learning: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor were used to categorize educational outcomes. A narrative approach was used to synthesize the data using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Discussion

Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Quality assessment for bias was conducted independently; study quality ranged from fair to poor. No study used a complete psychometrically tested instrument to measure genomic cognitive or affective knowledge; none measured the psychomotor domain.

Conclusions

Effective strategies to deliver genomic education are a priority. Development of reliable and valid instruments for the assessment of educational interventions, including the psychomotor skills needed for practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Outlook
Nursing Outlook 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Nursing Outlook, a bimonthly journal, provides innovative ideas for nursing leaders through peer-reviewed articles and timely reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in nursing practice, education, and research, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. Nursing Outlook is the official journal of the American Academy of Nursing and the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science and supports their mission to serve the public and the nursing profession by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. The journal is included in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Journal Citation Reports published by Clarivate Analytics.
期刊最新文献
State of Black men in nursing: An oral history of the challenges and the benefits of five Black male nurse leaders An evaluation of a student-led nursing leadership symposium Moving toward standardized surveillance of “nurse” suicide mortality How Artificial Intelligence is altering the nursing workforce Abortion is healthcare: In what sense?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1