心脏手术中阿片类药物剂量的变化:多中心实践研究。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000007128
Clark Fisher, Allison M Janda, Xiwen Zhao, Yanhong Deng, Amit Bardia, N David Yanez, Michael L Burns, Michael F Aziz, Miriam Treggiari, Michael R Mathis, Hung-Mo Lin, Robert B Schonberger
{"title":"心脏手术中阿片类药物剂量的变化:多中心实践研究。","authors":"Clark Fisher, Allison M Janda, Xiwen Zhao, Yanhong Deng, Amit Bardia, N David Yanez, Michael L Burns, Michael F Aziz, Miriam Treggiari, Michael R Mathis, Hung-Mo Lin, Robert B Schonberger","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although high-opioid anesthesia was long the standard for cardiac surgery, some anesthesiologists now favor multimodal analgesia and low-opioid anesthetic techniques. The typical cardiac surgery opioid dose is unclear, and the degree to which patients, anesthesiologists, and institutions influence this opioid dose is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed data from nonemergency adult cardiac surgeries requiring cardiopulmonary bypass performed at 30 academic and community hospitals within the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group registry from 2014 through 2021. Intraoperative opioid administration was measured in fentanyl equivalents. We used hierarchical linear modeling to attribute opioid dose variation to the institution where each surgery took place, the primary attending anesthesiologist, and the specifics of the surgical patient and case.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 30 hospitals, 794 anesthesiologists, and 59,463 cardiac cases, patients received a mean of 1139 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1132-1146) fentanyl mcg equivalents of opioid, and doses varied widely (standard deviation [SD], 872 µg). The most frequently used opioids were fentanyl (86% of cases), sufentanil (16% of cases), hydromorphone (12% of cases), and morphine (3% of cases). 0.6% of cases were opioid-free. 60% of dose variation was explainable by institution and anesthesiologist. The median difference in opioid dose between 2 randomly selected anesthesiologists across all institutions was 600 µg of fentanyl (interquartile range [IQR], 283-1023 µg). An anesthesiologist's intraoperative opioid dose was strongly correlated with their frequency of using a sufentanil infusion (r = 0.81), but largely uncorrelated with their use of nonopioid analgesic techniques (|r| < 0.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-dose opioids predominate in cardiac surgery, with substantial dose variation from case to case. Much of this variation is attributable to practice variability rather than patient or surgical differences. This suggests an opportunity to optimize opioid use in cardiac surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opioid Dose Variation in Cardiac Surgery: A Multicenter Study of Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Clark Fisher, Allison M Janda, Xiwen Zhao, Yanhong Deng, Amit Bardia, N David Yanez, Michael L Burns, Michael F Aziz, Miriam Treggiari, Michael R Mathis, Hung-Mo Lin, Robert B Schonberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although high-opioid anesthesia was long the standard for cardiac surgery, some anesthesiologists now favor multimodal analgesia and low-opioid anesthetic techniques. The typical cardiac surgery opioid dose is unclear, and the degree to which patients, anesthesiologists, and institutions influence this opioid dose is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed data from nonemergency adult cardiac surgeries requiring cardiopulmonary bypass performed at 30 academic and community hospitals within the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group registry from 2014 through 2021. Intraoperative opioid administration was measured in fentanyl equivalents. We used hierarchical linear modeling to attribute opioid dose variation to the institution where each surgery took place, the primary attending anesthesiologist, and the specifics of the surgical patient and case.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 30 hospitals, 794 anesthesiologists, and 59,463 cardiac cases, patients received a mean of 1139 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1132-1146) fentanyl mcg equivalents of opioid, and doses varied widely (standard deviation [SD], 872 µg). The most frequently used opioids were fentanyl (86% of cases), sufentanil (16% of cases), hydromorphone (12% of cases), and morphine (3% of cases). 0.6% of cases were opioid-free. 60% of dose variation was explainable by institution and anesthesiologist. The median difference in opioid dose between 2 randomly selected anesthesiologists across all institutions was 600 µg of fentanyl (interquartile range [IQR], 283-1023 µg). An anesthesiologist's intraoperative opioid dose was strongly correlated with their frequency of using a sufentanil infusion (r = 0.81), but largely uncorrelated with their use of nonopioid analgesic techniques (|r| < 0.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-dose opioids predominate in cardiac surgery, with substantial dose variation from case to case. Much of this variation is attributable to practice variability rather than patient or surgical differences. This suggests an opportunity to optimize opioid use in cardiac surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia and analgesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia and analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007128\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007128","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管高阿片类药物麻醉长期以来一直是心脏手术的标准,但现在一些麻醉医生倾向于多模式镇痛和低阿片类药物麻醉技术。心脏手术阿片类药物的典型剂量尚不明确,患者、麻醉医师和医疗机构对阿片类药物剂量的影响程度也不清楚:我们回顾了 2014 年至 2021 年期间在多中心围手术期结果小组登记处的 30 家学术医院和社区医院进行的需要心肺旁路的非急诊成人心脏手术的数据。术中阿片类药物用量以芬太尼当量计算。我们使用分层线性建模法将阿片类药物剂量的变化归因于每例手术的发生机构、主要主治麻醉师以及手术患者和病例的具体情况:在 30 家医院、794 名麻醉师和 59463 例心脏手术中,患者平均接受了 1139(95% 置信区间 [CI],1132-1146)微克芬太尼当量的阿片类药物,剂量差异很大(标准差 [SD],872 微克)。最常用的阿片类药物是芬太尼(86% 的病例)、舒芬太尼(16% 的病例)、氢吗啡酮(12% 的病例)和吗啡(3% 的病例)。0.6%的病例不使用阿片类药物。60%的剂量差异可由医疗机构和麻醉师解释。在所有机构中,随机抽取的两名麻醉师的阿片类药物剂量差异中位数为 600 微克芬太尼(四分位数间距 [IQR],283-1023 微克)。麻醉医师的术中阿片类药物剂量与他们使用舒芬太尼输注的频率密切相关(r = 0.81),但与他们使用非阿片类镇痛技术基本无关(|r| < 0.3):结论:高剂量阿片类药物在心脏手术中占主导地位,不同病例的剂量差异很大。结论:高剂量阿片类药物在心脏手术中占主导地位,不同病例的剂量差异很大,这种差异主要归因于实践中的变异,而非患者或手术的差异。这表明有机会优化阿片类药物在心脏手术中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Opioid Dose Variation in Cardiac Surgery: A Multicenter Study of Practice.

Background: Although high-opioid anesthesia was long the standard for cardiac surgery, some anesthesiologists now favor multimodal analgesia and low-opioid anesthetic techniques. The typical cardiac surgery opioid dose is unclear, and the degree to which patients, anesthesiologists, and institutions influence this opioid dose is unknown.

Methods: We reviewed data from nonemergency adult cardiac surgeries requiring cardiopulmonary bypass performed at 30 academic and community hospitals within the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group registry from 2014 through 2021. Intraoperative opioid administration was measured in fentanyl equivalents. We used hierarchical linear modeling to attribute opioid dose variation to the institution where each surgery took place, the primary attending anesthesiologist, and the specifics of the surgical patient and case.

Results: Across 30 hospitals, 794 anesthesiologists, and 59,463 cardiac cases, patients received a mean of 1139 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1132-1146) fentanyl mcg equivalents of opioid, and doses varied widely (standard deviation [SD], 872 µg). The most frequently used opioids were fentanyl (86% of cases), sufentanil (16% of cases), hydromorphone (12% of cases), and morphine (3% of cases). 0.6% of cases were opioid-free. 60% of dose variation was explainable by institution and anesthesiologist. The median difference in opioid dose between 2 randomly selected anesthesiologists across all institutions was 600 µg of fentanyl (interquartile range [IQR], 283-1023 µg). An anesthesiologist's intraoperative opioid dose was strongly correlated with their frequency of using a sufentanil infusion (r = 0.81), but largely uncorrelated with their use of nonopioid analgesic techniques (|r| < 0.3).

Conclusions: High-dose opioids predominate in cardiac surgery, with substantial dose variation from case to case. Much of this variation is attributable to practice variability rather than patient or surgical differences. This suggests an opportunity to optimize opioid use in cardiac surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
期刊最新文献
Anesthesiologists' Role in Recognition, Prevention, and Treatment of Childbirth-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Perioperative Regional Anesthesia on Persistent Opioid Use and Chronic Pain after Noncardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Quality Improvement in the Digital Age: The Promise of Using Informatics to Improve Obstetric Anesthesia Care. In Response. The Dark Side of the Moon: Awe and Our Well-Being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1