宫颈癌预防干预措施在澳大利亚注射吸毒者中的覆盖范围

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104566
Olivia Price , Dorothy A. Machalek , Rachel Sutherland , Daisy Gibbs , Samantha Colledge-Frisby , Phillip Read , Amy Peacock
{"title":"宫颈癌预防干预措施在澳大利亚注射吸毒者中的覆盖范围","authors":"Olivia Price ,&nbsp;Dorothy A. Machalek ,&nbsp;Rachel Sutherland ,&nbsp;Daisy Gibbs ,&nbsp;Samantha Colledge-Frisby ,&nbsp;Phillip Read ,&nbsp;Amy Peacock","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and regular (i.e., every five years) cervical screening are essential to prevent cervical cancer. Australia has high overall coverage of both interventions but little is known about coverage among people who inject drugs. and known barriers to preventive care among this population may extend to cervical cancer control measures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were obtained from the 2023 Illicit Drug Reporting System interviews, in which people who regularly inject drugs participated. The sample was restricted to people with a cervix, with participants aged 25–74 years eligible for the National Cervical Screening Program and participants born after 1980 eligible for HPV vaccination. Age-standardised prevalence ratios were used to compare coverage among this sample to the Australian general population; other results were summarised descriptively.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Among participants eligible for screening (<em>n</em> = 243), most (96.7 %) reported lifetime uptake, while 70.2 % had been screened during the past five years, which was similar to the general population (prevalence ratio [PR]: 1.14, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.96–1.31). Among those never or overdue for screening (<em>n</em> = 57), one third (31.7 %) were aware that self-sampling is available and barriers to screening varied, with similar numbers reporting personal (e.g., ‘I didn't know I needed to’), logistical (e.g., ‘I don't have time’), and test-related reasons (e.g., ‘the test is uncomfortable/painful’). Among participants eligible for HPV vaccination (<em>n</em> = 99), coverage was 27.2 %, 38 % lower than the general population (PR: 0.62, 95 % CI: 0.39–0.86).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Cervical screening coverage among this sample of people who inject drugs was similar to the Australian population. Health promotion messaging that focuses on the availability of self-sampling and the importance of regular screening may improve coverage among those overdue for screening. HPV vaccination was lower than the general population, warranting targeted efforts to offer the vaccine to eligible people who inject drugs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 104566"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002500/pdfft?md5=fff8b9f076af4ec2347cf4ba7871c1ee&pid=1-s2.0-S0955395924002500-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coverage of cervical cancer prevention interventions among people in Australia who inject drugs\",\"authors\":\"Olivia Price ,&nbsp;Dorothy A. Machalek ,&nbsp;Rachel Sutherland ,&nbsp;Daisy Gibbs ,&nbsp;Samantha Colledge-Frisby ,&nbsp;Phillip Read ,&nbsp;Amy Peacock\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and regular (i.e., every five years) cervical screening are essential to prevent cervical cancer. Australia has high overall coverage of both interventions but little is known about coverage among people who inject drugs. and known barriers to preventive care among this population may extend to cervical cancer control measures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were obtained from the 2023 Illicit Drug Reporting System interviews, in which people who regularly inject drugs participated. The sample was restricted to people with a cervix, with participants aged 25–74 years eligible for the National Cervical Screening Program and participants born after 1980 eligible for HPV vaccination. Age-standardised prevalence ratios were used to compare coverage among this sample to the Australian general population; other results were summarised descriptively.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Among participants eligible for screening (<em>n</em> = 243), most (96.7 %) reported lifetime uptake, while 70.2 % had been screened during the past five years, which was similar to the general population (prevalence ratio [PR]: 1.14, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.96–1.31). Among those never or overdue for screening (<em>n</em> = 57), one third (31.7 %) were aware that self-sampling is available and barriers to screening varied, with similar numbers reporting personal (e.g., ‘I didn't know I needed to’), logistical (e.g., ‘I don't have time’), and test-related reasons (e.g., ‘the test is uncomfortable/painful’). Among participants eligible for HPV vaccination (<em>n</em> = 99), coverage was 27.2 %, 38 % lower than the general population (PR: 0.62, 95 % CI: 0.39–0.86).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Cervical screening coverage among this sample of people who inject drugs was similar to the Australian population. Health promotion messaging that focuses on the availability of self-sampling and the importance of regular screening may improve coverage among those overdue for screening. HPV vaccination was lower than the general population, warranting targeted efforts to offer the vaccine to eligible people who inject drugs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"volume\":\"132 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002500/pdfft?md5=fff8b9f076af4ec2347cf4ba7871c1ee&pid=1-s2.0-S0955395924002500-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002500\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002500","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景人类乳头瘤病毒 (HPV) 疫苗和定期(即每五年一次)宫颈筛查对预防宫颈癌至关重要。澳大利亚这两项干预措施的总体覆盖率很高,但对注射毒品人群的覆盖率却知之甚少。方法数据来自 2023 年非法药物报告系统访谈,经常注射毒品的人参与了访谈。样本仅限于有宫颈的人群,其中 25-74 岁的参与者符合国家宫颈筛查计划的条件,1980 年后出生的参与者符合接种 HPV 疫苗的条件。结果在符合筛查条件的参与者(n = 243)中,大多数人(96.7%)表示终生接受筛查,70.2%的人在过去五年中接受过筛查,这与普通人群的情况相似(患病率比[PR]:1.14,95%置信区间[CI]:0.96-1.31)。在从未接受筛查或逾期未接受筛查的人(n = 57)中,有三分之一(31.7%)知道可以进行自我采样,筛查的障碍各不相同,报告个人原因(如 "我不知道我需要")、后勤原因(如 "我没有时间")和测试相关原因(如 "测试不舒服/疼痛")的人数相近。在符合 HPV 疫苗接种条件的参与者中(n = 99),覆盖率为 27.2%,比普通人群低 38%(PR:0.62,95 % CI:0.39-0.86)。重点宣传自我采样的可用性和定期筛查的重要性的健康促进信息可能会提高逾期筛查人群的覆盖率。HPV疫苗接种率低于普通人群,因此需要有针对性地向符合条件的注射吸毒者提供疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coverage of cervical cancer prevention interventions among people in Australia who inject drugs

Background

The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and regular (i.e., every five years) cervical screening are essential to prevent cervical cancer. Australia has high overall coverage of both interventions but little is known about coverage among people who inject drugs. and known barriers to preventive care among this population may extend to cervical cancer control measures.

Methods

Data were obtained from the 2023 Illicit Drug Reporting System interviews, in which people who regularly inject drugs participated. The sample was restricted to people with a cervix, with participants aged 25–74 years eligible for the National Cervical Screening Program and participants born after 1980 eligible for HPV vaccination. Age-standardised prevalence ratios were used to compare coverage among this sample to the Australian general population; other results were summarised descriptively.

Findings

Among participants eligible for screening (n = 243), most (96.7 %) reported lifetime uptake, while 70.2 % had been screened during the past five years, which was similar to the general population (prevalence ratio [PR]: 1.14, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.96–1.31). Among those never or overdue for screening (n = 57), one third (31.7 %) were aware that self-sampling is available and barriers to screening varied, with similar numbers reporting personal (e.g., ‘I didn't know I needed to’), logistical (e.g., ‘I don't have time’), and test-related reasons (e.g., ‘the test is uncomfortable/painful’). Among participants eligible for HPV vaccination (n = 99), coverage was 27.2 %, 38 % lower than the general population (PR: 0.62, 95 % CI: 0.39–0.86).

Conclusions

Cervical screening coverage among this sample of people who inject drugs was similar to the Australian population. Health promotion messaging that focuses on the availability of self-sampling and the importance of regular screening may improve coverage among those overdue for screening. HPV vaccination was lower than the general population, warranting targeted efforts to offer the vaccine to eligible people who inject drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
National impact of a constraining regulatory framework on pregabalin dispensations in France, 2020–2022 Suboptimal uptake and placement of a mandatory alcohol pregnancy warning label in Australia Increases in employment over six months following Khanya: A secondary analysis of a pilot randomized controlled trial of a peer-delivered behavioral intervention for substance use and HIV medication adherence in Cape Town, South Africa The criminal careers of Australian drug traffickers Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cannabis cultivation and use in 18 countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1