{"title":"利用双极膜电渗析 (BPMED) 中的有机酸可提高洗涤器废水中的氨回收率","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2024.122296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While air stripping combined with acid scrubbing remains a competitive technology for the removal and recovery of ammonia from wastewater streams, its use of strong acids is concerning. Organic acids offer promising alternatives to strong acids like sulphuric acid, but their application remains limited due to high cost. This study proposes an integration of air stripping and organic acid scrubbing with bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BPMED) to regenerate the organic acids. We compared the energy consumption and current efficiency of BPMED in recovering dissolved ammonia and regenerating sulphuric, citric, and maleic acids from synthetic scrubber effluents. Current efficiency was lower when regenerating sulphuric acid (22 %) compared to citric (47 %) and maleic acid (37 %), attributable to the competitive proton transport over ammonium across the cation exchange membrane. Organic salts functioned as buffers, reducing the concentration of free protons, resulting in higher ammonium removal efficiencies with citrate (75 %) and malate (68 %), compared to sulphate (29 %). Consequently, the energy consumption of the BPMED decreased by 54 % and 35 % while regenerating citric and maleic acids, respectively, compared to sulfuric acid. Membrane characterisation experiments showed that the electrical conductivity ranking, ammonium citrate > ammonium malate > ammonium sulphate, was mirrored by the energy consumption (kWh/kg-N recovered) ranking, ammonium sulphate (15.6) < ammonium malate (10.2) < ammonium citrate (7.2), while the permselectivity ranking, ammonium sulphate > ammonium citrate > ammonium malate, aligned with calculated charge densities. This work demonstrates the potential of combining organic acid scrubbers with BPMED for ammonium recovery from wastewater effluents with minimum chemical input.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135424011953/pdfft?md5=931d2a17b02152ea24475c3f00f3d9f9&pid=1-s2.0-S0043135424011953-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging organic acids in bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BPMED) can enhance ammonia recovery from scrubber effluents\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.watres.2024.122296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While air stripping combined with acid scrubbing remains a competitive technology for the removal and recovery of ammonia from wastewater streams, its use of strong acids is concerning. Organic acids offer promising alternatives to strong acids like sulphuric acid, but their application remains limited due to high cost. This study proposes an integration of air stripping and organic acid scrubbing with bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BPMED) to regenerate the organic acids. We compared the energy consumption and current efficiency of BPMED in recovering dissolved ammonia and regenerating sulphuric, citric, and maleic acids from synthetic scrubber effluents. Current efficiency was lower when regenerating sulphuric acid (22 %) compared to citric (47 %) and maleic acid (37 %), attributable to the competitive proton transport over ammonium across the cation exchange membrane. Organic salts functioned as buffers, reducing the concentration of free protons, resulting in higher ammonium removal efficiencies with citrate (75 %) and malate (68 %), compared to sulphate (29 %). Consequently, the energy consumption of the BPMED decreased by 54 % and 35 % while regenerating citric and maleic acids, respectively, compared to sulfuric acid. Membrane characterisation experiments showed that the electrical conductivity ranking, ammonium citrate > ammonium malate > ammonium sulphate, was mirrored by the energy consumption (kWh/kg-N recovered) ranking, ammonium sulphate (15.6) < ammonium malate (10.2) < ammonium citrate (7.2), while the permselectivity ranking, ammonium sulphate > ammonium citrate > ammonium malate, aligned with calculated charge densities. This work demonstrates the potential of combining organic acid scrubbers with BPMED for ammonium recovery from wastewater effluents with minimum chemical input.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135424011953/pdfft?md5=931d2a17b02152ea24475c3f00f3d9f9&pid=1-s2.0-S0043135424011953-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135424011953\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135424011953","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Leveraging organic acids in bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BPMED) can enhance ammonia recovery from scrubber effluents
While air stripping combined with acid scrubbing remains a competitive technology for the removal and recovery of ammonia from wastewater streams, its use of strong acids is concerning. Organic acids offer promising alternatives to strong acids like sulphuric acid, but their application remains limited due to high cost. This study proposes an integration of air stripping and organic acid scrubbing with bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BPMED) to regenerate the organic acids. We compared the energy consumption and current efficiency of BPMED in recovering dissolved ammonia and regenerating sulphuric, citric, and maleic acids from synthetic scrubber effluents. Current efficiency was lower when regenerating sulphuric acid (22 %) compared to citric (47 %) and maleic acid (37 %), attributable to the competitive proton transport over ammonium across the cation exchange membrane. Organic salts functioned as buffers, reducing the concentration of free protons, resulting in higher ammonium removal efficiencies with citrate (75 %) and malate (68 %), compared to sulphate (29 %). Consequently, the energy consumption of the BPMED decreased by 54 % and 35 % while regenerating citric and maleic acids, respectively, compared to sulfuric acid. Membrane characterisation experiments showed that the electrical conductivity ranking, ammonium citrate > ammonium malate > ammonium sulphate, was mirrored by the energy consumption (kWh/kg-N recovered) ranking, ammonium sulphate (15.6) < ammonium malate (10.2) < ammonium citrate (7.2), while the permselectivity ranking, ammonium sulphate > ammonium citrate > ammonium malate, aligned with calculated charge densities. This work demonstrates the potential of combining organic acid scrubbers with BPMED for ammonium recovery from wastewater effluents with minimum chemical input.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.