Haeree P. Lang , Kevin C. Osum , Steven G. Friedenberg
{"title":"狗 CD4+ T 细胞分化和多样性综述。","authors":"Haeree P. Lang , Kevin C. Osum , Steven G. Friedenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.vetimm.2024.110816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells are an integral component of the adaptive immune response, carrying out many functions to combat a diverse range of pathogenic challenges. These cells exhibit remarkable plasticity, differentiating into specialized subsets such as T helper type 1 (T<sub>H</sub>1), T<sub>H</sub>2, T<sub>H</sub>9, T<sub>H</sub>17, T<sub>H</sub>22, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and follicular T helper (T<sub>FH</sub>) cells. Each subset is capable of addressing a distinct immunological need ranging from pathogen eradication to regulation of immune homeostasis. As the immune response subsides, CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells rest down into long-lived memory phenotypes—including central memory (T<sub>CM</sub>), effector memory (T<sub>EM</sub>), resident memory (T<sub>RM</sub>), and terminally differentiated effector memory cells (T<sub>EMRA</sub>) that are localized to facilitate a swift and potent response upon antigen re-encounter. This capacity for long-term immunological memory and rapid reactivation upon secondary exposure highlights the role CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells play in sustaining both adaptive defense mechanisms and maintenance.</p><p>Decades of mouse, human, and to a lesser extent, pig T cell research has provided the framework for understanding the role of CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells in immune responses, but these model systems do not always mimic each other. Although our understanding of pig immunology is not as extensive as mouse or human research, we have gained valuable insight by studying this model. More akin to pigs, our understanding of CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells in dogs is much less complete. This disparity exists in part because canine immunologists depend on paradigms from mouse and human studies to characterize CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells in dogs, with a fraction of available lineage-defining antibody markers. Despite this, every major CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell subset has been described to some extent in dogs. These subsets have been studied in various contexts, including <em>in vitro</em> stimulation, homeostatic conditions, and across a range of disease states. Canine CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells have been categorized according to lineage-defining characteristics, trafficking patterns, and what cytokines they produce upon stimulation. This review addresses our current understanding of canine CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells from a comparative perspective by highlighting both the similarities and differences from mouse, human, and pig CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell biology. We also discuss knowledge gaps in our current understanding of CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells in dogs that could provide direction for future studies in the field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23511,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","volume":"275 ","pages":"Article 110816"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of CD4+ T cell differentiation and diversity in dogs\",\"authors\":\"Haeree P. Lang , Kevin C. Osum , Steven G. Friedenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vetimm.2024.110816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells are an integral component of the adaptive immune response, carrying out many functions to combat a diverse range of pathogenic challenges. These cells exhibit remarkable plasticity, differentiating into specialized subsets such as T helper type 1 (T<sub>H</sub>1), T<sub>H</sub>2, T<sub>H</sub>9, T<sub>H</sub>17, T<sub>H</sub>22, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and follicular T helper (T<sub>FH</sub>) cells. Each subset is capable of addressing a distinct immunological need ranging from pathogen eradication to regulation of immune homeostasis. As the immune response subsides, CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells rest down into long-lived memory phenotypes—including central memory (T<sub>CM</sub>), effector memory (T<sub>EM</sub>), resident memory (T<sub>RM</sub>), and terminally differentiated effector memory cells (T<sub>EMRA</sub>) that are localized to facilitate a swift and potent response upon antigen re-encounter. This capacity for long-term immunological memory and rapid reactivation upon secondary exposure highlights the role CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells play in sustaining both adaptive defense mechanisms and maintenance.</p><p>Decades of mouse, human, and to a lesser extent, pig T cell research has provided the framework for understanding the role of CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells in immune responses, but these model systems do not always mimic each other. Although our understanding of pig immunology is not as extensive as mouse or human research, we have gained valuable insight by studying this model. More akin to pigs, our understanding of CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells in dogs is much less complete. This disparity exists in part because canine immunologists depend on paradigms from mouse and human studies to characterize CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells in dogs, with a fraction of available lineage-defining antibody markers. Despite this, every major CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell subset has been described to some extent in dogs. These subsets have been studied in various contexts, including <em>in vitro</em> stimulation, homeostatic conditions, and across a range of disease states. Canine CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells have been categorized according to lineage-defining characteristics, trafficking patterns, and what cytokines they produce upon stimulation. This review addresses our current understanding of canine CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells from a comparative perspective by highlighting both the similarities and differences from mouse, human, and pig CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell biology. We also discuss knowledge gaps in our current understanding of CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells in dogs that could provide direction for future studies in the field.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology\",\"volume\":\"275 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110816\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165242724001028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165242724001028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
CD4+ T 细胞是适应性免疫反应不可或缺的组成部分,具有多种功能,可应对各种致病挑战。这些细胞具有显著的可塑性,可分化为特化亚群,如 1 型 T 辅助细胞 (TH1)、TH2、TH9、TH17、TH22、调节性 T 细胞 (Treg) 和滤泡 T 辅助细胞 (TFH)。从消灭病原体到调节免疫平衡,每个亚群都能满足不同的免疫需求。随着免疫反应的消退,CD4+ T 细胞会衰退为长效记忆表型,包括中枢记忆细胞(TCM)、效应记忆细胞(TEM)、常驻记忆细胞(TRM)和终末分化效应记忆细胞(TEMRA)。这种长期免疫记忆和二次接触时快速再激活的能力突出了 CD4+ T 细胞在维持适应性防御机制和维护方面所起的作用。数十年的小鼠、人类以及猪 T 细胞研究为了解 CD4+ T 细胞在免疫反应中的作用提供了框架,但这些模型系统并不总是相互模仿。虽然我们对猪免疫学的了解不如小鼠或人类研究广泛,但我们通过研究这一模型获得了宝贵的见解。狗的 CD4+ T 细胞与猪更为相似,但我们对狗的 CD4+ T 细胞的了解却不那么全面。存在这种差异的部分原因是,犬免疫学家依赖于小鼠和人类研究的范例来描述犬 CD4+ T 细胞的特征,而可用的线型定义抗体标记物只有一小部分。尽管如此,每个主要的 CD4+ T 细胞亚群在狗身上都有一定程度的描述。这些亚群已在不同的环境下进行了研究,包括体外刺激、平衡状态和各种疾病状态。犬 CD4+ T 细胞已根据其系定义特征、贩运模式和刺激后产生的细胞因子进行了分类。本综述从比较的角度探讨了我们目前对犬 CD4+ T 细胞的认识,强调了它们与小鼠、人类和猪 CD4+ T 细胞生物学的相似之处和不同之处。我们还讨论了目前对犬 CD4+ T 细胞认识的不足之处,这些不足之处可为该领域未来的研究提供方向。
A review of CD4+ T cell differentiation and diversity in dogs
CD4+ T cells are an integral component of the adaptive immune response, carrying out many functions to combat a diverse range of pathogenic challenges. These cells exhibit remarkable plasticity, differentiating into specialized subsets such as T helper type 1 (TH1), TH2, TH9, TH17, TH22, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and follicular T helper (TFH) cells. Each subset is capable of addressing a distinct immunological need ranging from pathogen eradication to regulation of immune homeostasis. As the immune response subsides, CD4+ T cells rest down into long-lived memory phenotypes—including central memory (TCM), effector memory (TEM), resident memory (TRM), and terminally differentiated effector memory cells (TEMRA) that are localized to facilitate a swift and potent response upon antigen re-encounter. This capacity for long-term immunological memory and rapid reactivation upon secondary exposure highlights the role CD4+ T cells play in sustaining both adaptive defense mechanisms and maintenance.
Decades of mouse, human, and to a lesser extent, pig T cell research has provided the framework for understanding the role of CD4+ T cells in immune responses, but these model systems do not always mimic each other. Although our understanding of pig immunology is not as extensive as mouse or human research, we have gained valuable insight by studying this model. More akin to pigs, our understanding of CD4+ T cells in dogs is much less complete. This disparity exists in part because canine immunologists depend on paradigms from mouse and human studies to characterize CD4+ T cells in dogs, with a fraction of available lineage-defining antibody markers. Despite this, every major CD4+ T cell subset has been described to some extent in dogs. These subsets have been studied in various contexts, including in vitro stimulation, homeostatic conditions, and across a range of disease states. Canine CD4+ T cells have been categorized according to lineage-defining characteristics, trafficking patterns, and what cytokines they produce upon stimulation. This review addresses our current understanding of canine CD4+ T cells from a comparative perspective by highlighting both the similarities and differences from mouse, human, and pig CD4+ T cell biology. We also discuss knowledge gaps in our current understanding of CD4+ T cells in dogs that could provide direction for future studies in the field.
期刊介绍:
The journal reports basic, comparative and clinical immunology as they pertain to the animal species designated here: livestock, poultry, and fish species that are major food animals and companion animals such as cats, dogs, horses and camels, and wildlife species that act as reservoirs for food, companion or human infectious diseases, or as models for human disease.
Rodent models of infectious diseases that are of importance in the animal species indicated above,when the disease requires a level of containment that is not readily available for larger animal experimentation (ABSL3), will be considered. Papers on rabbits, lizards, guinea pigs, badgers, armadillos, elephants, antelope, and buffalo will be reviewed if the research advances our fundamental understanding of immunology, or if they act as a reservoir of infectious disease for the primary animal species designated above, or for humans. Manuscripts employing other species will be reviewed if justified as fitting into the categories above.
The following topics are appropriate: biology of cells and mechanisms of the immune system, immunochemistry, immunodeficiencies, immunodiagnosis, immunogenetics, immunopathology, immunology of infectious disease and tumors, immunoprophylaxis including vaccine development and delivery, immunological aspects of pregnancy including passive immunity, autoimmuity, neuroimmunology, and transplanatation immunology. Manuscripts that describe new genes and development of tools such as monoclonal antibodies are also of interest when part of a larger biological study. Studies employing extracts or constituents (plant extracts, feed additives or microbiome) must be sufficiently defined to be reproduced in other laboratories and also provide evidence for possible mechanisms and not simply show an effect on the immune system.