{"title":"挑战既定规范:醇类在 UV/PDS 自由基淬灭中的意外作用。","authors":"Boqiang Li, Baiyang Chen, Zongsu Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>UV/peroxydisulfate (UV/PDS) process is known to be highly efficient for degrading micropollutants from water by generating sulfate (SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup>) and hydroxyl radicals (HO<sup>•</sup>). Reliable analyses of short-lived SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup> and HO<sup>•</sup> are therefore critical for understanding reaction mechanisms and optimizing operating conditions. Currently, alcohols are commonly used as quenchers to distinguish radicals based on the assumption that they exclusively react with target radicals without other influences. However, this study for the first time reveals a series of unexpected effects that challenge this conventional wisdom because: 1) adding alcohols altered the decomposition rates of PDS by replacing the reactions between SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup> and HO<sup>•</sup> with PDS by the reactions between secondary reactive species and PDS; and 2) SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup> preferably reacted with alcohols to generate nonnegligible level of hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) under oxygen-rich conditions, which subsequently led to indirect formation of HO<sup>•</sup>. Additionally, the formation of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> was substantially impacted by the types of alcohols, dosages, dissolved oxygen, and solution pH. Using probe tests as tools, we found that the actual SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup> levels after dosing alcohols were only slightly different from assumed/expected levels, whereas the actually HO<sup>•</sup> levels were 43.7, 3364.9, and 12.5 times higher than assumed/expected conditions for samples dosed with methanol, iso-propanol, and tert-butanol, respectively. These unanticipated effects thus suggest that cautions are needed when using alcohols to qualitative and quantitative determine HO<sup>•</sup> and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup> in UV/PDS process.</p>","PeriodicalId":94082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging established norms: The unanticipated role of alcohols in UV/PDS radical quenching.\",\"authors\":\"Boqiang Li, Baiyang Chen, Zongsu Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>UV/peroxydisulfate (UV/PDS) process is known to be highly efficient for degrading micropollutants from water by generating sulfate (SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup>) and hydroxyl radicals (HO<sup>•</sup>). Reliable analyses of short-lived SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup> and HO<sup>•</sup> are therefore critical for understanding reaction mechanisms and optimizing operating conditions. Currently, alcohols are commonly used as quenchers to distinguish radicals based on the assumption that they exclusively react with target radicals without other influences. However, this study for the first time reveals a series of unexpected effects that challenge this conventional wisdom because: 1) adding alcohols altered the decomposition rates of PDS by replacing the reactions between SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup> and HO<sup>•</sup> with PDS by the reactions between secondary reactive species and PDS; and 2) SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup> preferably reacted with alcohols to generate nonnegligible level of hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) under oxygen-rich conditions, which subsequently led to indirect formation of HO<sup>•</sup>. Additionally, the formation of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> was substantially impacted by the types of alcohols, dosages, dissolved oxygen, and solution pH. Using probe tests as tools, we found that the actual SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup> levels after dosing alcohols were only slightly different from assumed/expected levels, whereas the actually HO<sup>•</sup> levels were 43.7, 3364.9, and 12.5 times higher than assumed/expected conditions for samples dosed with methanol, iso-propanol, and tert-butanol, respectively. These unanticipated effects thus suggest that cautions are needed when using alcohols to qualitative and quantitative determine HO<sup>•</sup> and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup> in UV/PDS process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hazardous materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hazardous materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Challenging established norms: The unanticipated role of alcohols in UV/PDS radical quenching.
UV/peroxydisulfate (UV/PDS) process is known to be highly efficient for degrading micropollutants from water by generating sulfate (SO4•-) and hydroxyl radicals (HO•). Reliable analyses of short-lived SO4•- and HO• are therefore critical for understanding reaction mechanisms and optimizing operating conditions. Currently, alcohols are commonly used as quenchers to distinguish radicals based on the assumption that they exclusively react with target radicals without other influences. However, this study for the first time reveals a series of unexpected effects that challenge this conventional wisdom because: 1) adding alcohols altered the decomposition rates of PDS by replacing the reactions between SO4•- and HO• with PDS by the reactions between secondary reactive species and PDS; and 2) SO4•- preferably reacted with alcohols to generate nonnegligible level of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) under oxygen-rich conditions, which subsequently led to indirect formation of HO•. Additionally, the formation of H2O2 was substantially impacted by the types of alcohols, dosages, dissolved oxygen, and solution pH. Using probe tests as tools, we found that the actual SO4•- levels after dosing alcohols were only slightly different from assumed/expected levels, whereas the actually HO• levels were 43.7, 3364.9, and 12.5 times higher than assumed/expected conditions for samples dosed with methanol, iso-propanol, and tert-butanol, respectively. These unanticipated effects thus suggest that cautions are needed when using alcohols to qualitative and quantitative determine HO• and SO4•- in UV/PDS process.