社会贫困指数与家庭透析技术失败的关系:单中心经验。

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney360 Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000000000557
Justin Weissberg, Catherine Liu, TramAnh Phan, Scott Liebman, Sai Subhodhini Reddy, Catherine A Moore
{"title":"社会贫困指数与家庭透析技术失败的关系:单中心经验。","authors":"Justin Weissberg, Catherine Liu, TramAnh Phan, Scott Liebman, Sai Subhodhini Reddy, Catherine A Moore","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000000000557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite offering several advantages to patients and healthcare systems, utilization of home dialysis modalities (HDM) remains low, particularly among racial and ethnic minorities, and those with increased sociodemographic stress. Providers' apprehension towards adverse outcomes and home dialysis failure remains a barrier to HDM referral. We investigated the relationship sociodemographic factors have on HDM use and technique failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult incident ESRD patients over a six-year period at the University of Rochester to evaluate the association between demographic factors, social deprivation index (SDI), and co-morbidity burden on HDM utilization and technique failure. Person-time incidence rates were calculated to compare outcome variables, and rates were compared using a Poisson Rate Ratio Test. A univariate Cox regression was used to examine predictors impacting technique failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 873 patients, 102 started dialysis with HDM, 79 patients converted to HDM, and 692 remained on in-center hemodialysis (ICHD). Age, race, and SDI scores were significantly different between patients starting on ICHD, peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD) with no significant difference in comorbidity burden. Black patients represented 32% of the overall cohort, but only 16% of the initial home dialysis population. Compared to those that remained on ICHD, individuals converting from ICHD to HDM were younger and had significantly different SDI scores. SDI was not associated with HDM technique failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Historically underrepresented racial populations are less represented in those starting home dialysis, however there was no racial difference in the group transitioning to HDM after initiating ICHD. Social deprivation scores were higher in those on ICHD compared to PD. Neither social deprivation nor race predicted success on home therapy. These findings demonstrate a disparity in initial modality, and a disconnect between sociodemographic factors associated with home dialysis use and those predicting HDM technique failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Social Deprivation Index with Home Dialysis Technique Failure: A Single Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Justin Weissberg, Catherine Liu, TramAnh Phan, Scott Liebman, Sai Subhodhini Reddy, Catherine A Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.34067/KID.0000000000000557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite offering several advantages to patients and healthcare systems, utilization of home dialysis modalities (HDM) remains low, particularly among racial and ethnic minorities, and those with increased sociodemographic stress. Providers' apprehension towards adverse outcomes and home dialysis failure remains a barrier to HDM referral. We investigated the relationship sociodemographic factors have on HDM use and technique failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult incident ESRD patients over a six-year period at the University of Rochester to evaluate the association between demographic factors, social deprivation index (SDI), and co-morbidity burden on HDM utilization and technique failure. Person-time incidence rates were calculated to compare outcome variables, and rates were compared using a Poisson Rate Ratio Test. A univariate Cox regression was used to examine predictors impacting technique failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 873 patients, 102 started dialysis with HDM, 79 patients converted to HDM, and 692 remained on in-center hemodialysis (ICHD). Age, race, and SDI scores were significantly different between patients starting on ICHD, peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD) with no significant difference in comorbidity burden. Black patients represented 32% of the overall cohort, but only 16% of the initial home dialysis population. Compared to those that remained on ICHD, individuals converting from ICHD to HDM were younger and had significantly different SDI scores. SDI was not associated with HDM technique failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Historically underrepresented racial populations are less represented in those starting home dialysis, however there was no racial difference in the group transitioning to HDM after initiating ICHD. Social deprivation scores were higher in those on ICHD compared to PD. Neither social deprivation nor race predicted success on home therapy. These findings demonstrate a disparity in initial modality, and a disconnect between sociodemographic factors associated with home dialysis use and those predicting HDM technique failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney360\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000000000557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000000000557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管家庭透析(HDM)为患者和医疗保健系统带来了诸多好处,但其利用率仍然很低,尤其是在少数种族和少数民族以及社会人口压力较大的人群中。医疗服务提供者对不良后果和家庭透析失败的担忧仍然是家庭透析转诊的一个障碍。我们调查了社会人口因素与使用 HDM 和技术失败之间的关系:我们对罗切斯特大学六年内的成年 ESRD 患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以评估人口统计因素、社会贫困指数 (SDI) 和并发症负担与使用 HDM 和技术失败之间的关系。通过计算个人时间发病率来比较结果变量,并使用泊松率比检验来比较发病率。采用单变量考克斯回归法研究影响技术失败的预测因素:在 873 名患者中,102 人开始使用 HDM 透析,79 人转为 HDM 透析,692 人继续使用中心内血液透析 (ICHD)。开始接受中心内血液透析(ICHD)、腹膜透析(PD)和家庭血液透析(HHD)的患者在年龄、种族和 SDI 评分方面存在显著差异,但在合并症负担方面没有显著差异。黑人患者占整个群体的 32%,但只占初始家庭透析患者的 16%。与仍在接受 ICHD 的患者相比,从 ICHD 转为 HDM 的患者更年轻,其 SDI 评分也有显著差异。SDI与HDM技术失败无关:结论:在开始进行家庭透析的人群中,历来代表性不足的种族人口比例较低,但在开始进行 ICHD 后转为 HDM 的人群中没有种族差异。与透析患者相比,接受 ICHD 患者的社会贫困程度得分更高。社会贫困程度和种族都不能预测家庭治疗的成功率。这些研究结果表明了初始模式的差异,以及与使用家庭透析相关的社会人口因素与预测 HDM 技术失败的社会人口因素之间的脱节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of Social Deprivation Index with Home Dialysis Technique Failure: A Single Center Experience.

Background: Despite offering several advantages to patients and healthcare systems, utilization of home dialysis modalities (HDM) remains low, particularly among racial and ethnic minorities, and those with increased sociodemographic stress. Providers' apprehension towards adverse outcomes and home dialysis failure remains a barrier to HDM referral. We investigated the relationship sociodemographic factors have on HDM use and technique failure.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult incident ESRD patients over a six-year period at the University of Rochester to evaluate the association between demographic factors, social deprivation index (SDI), and co-morbidity burden on HDM utilization and technique failure. Person-time incidence rates were calculated to compare outcome variables, and rates were compared using a Poisson Rate Ratio Test. A univariate Cox regression was used to examine predictors impacting technique failure.

Results: Of the 873 patients, 102 started dialysis with HDM, 79 patients converted to HDM, and 692 remained on in-center hemodialysis (ICHD). Age, race, and SDI scores were significantly different between patients starting on ICHD, peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD) with no significant difference in comorbidity burden. Black patients represented 32% of the overall cohort, but only 16% of the initial home dialysis population. Compared to those that remained on ICHD, individuals converting from ICHD to HDM were younger and had significantly different SDI scores. SDI was not associated with HDM technique failure.

Conclusions: Historically underrepresented racial populations are less represented in those starting home dialysis, however there was no racial difference in the group transitioning to HDM after initiating ICHD. Social deprivation scores were higher in those on ICHD compared to PD. Neither social deprivation nor race predicted success on home therapy. These findings demonstrate a disparity in initial modality, and a disconnect between sociodemographic factors associated with home dialysis use and those predicting HDM technique failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Association of Heart Failure and Edema Events between Patients Initiating SZC or Patiromer. Changes in 24-hour Urine Chemistry in Patients with Nephrolithiasis during Weight Loss with Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Based Therapies. A Single-Center Retrospective Study to Identify Causes of Sex Differences in the Living Kidney Donor Evaluation Process. Renal Disease and Kidney Transplantation in Hispanic American Persons. Global Perspective of Acute Kidney Injury: Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1