青少年犯罪的风险和保护因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析总览

IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102479
{"title":"青少年犯罪的风险和保护因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析总览","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been conducted on the risk and protective factors of youth crime. This study aims to consolidate this evidence using an umbrella review methodology.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic electronic search was conducted using multiple electronic databases. Strength of associations was evaluated using quantitative umbrella review criteria, and AMSTAR was used to assess the quality of the studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 58 factors identified, 11 factors were supported by highly suggestive or suggestive evidence. Evidence of association was highly suggestive (class II) for substance use (odds ratio [OR] = 2·29, 95%CI 1·58–3.01), previous history of crime (OR = 2·03, 95%CI 1·62–2·45), moral development (OR = 3·98, 95%CI 3·57–4·39), psychopathology (OR = 2·22, 95%CI 1.40–2.69), adverse childhood experiences (OR = 1·37, 95%CI = 1·36–1·38), poor parental supervision (OR = 1·85, 95%CI 1·83–1·87), maltreatment or neglect (OR = 1·34, 95%CI 1·08–1·65), attachment (OR = 1·94; 95%CI 1.93–1·95), and school bullying (OR = 2·50; 95%CI 2·03–3·08); and suggestive (class III) for peer pressure (OR = 2·11, 95%CI 2·06–2·16) and supportive school environments (OR = 0·56; 95%CI 0·55–0·57).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The evidence-based atlas of key risk and protective factors identified in this umbrella review could be used as a benchmark for advancing research, prevention, and early intervention strategies for youth crime.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001004/pdfft?md5=648bcbdbc167c8b954a8f45287d934df&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824001004-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk and protective factors of youth crime: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been conducted on the risk and protective factors of youth crime. This study aims to consolidate this evidence using an umbrella review methodology.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic electronic search was conducted using multiple electronic databases. Strength of associations was evaluated using quantitative umbrella review criteria, and AMSTAR was used to assess the quality of the studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 58 factors identified, 11 factors were supported by highly suggestive or suggestive evidence. Evidence of association was highly suggestive (class II) for substance use (odds ratio [OR] = 2·29, 95%CI 1·58–3.01), previous history of crime (OR = 2·03, 95%CI 1·62–2·45), moral development (OR = 3·98, 95%CI 3·57–4·39), psychopathology (OR = 2·22, 95%CI 1.40–2.69), adverse childhood experiences (OR = 1·37, 95%CI = 1·36–1·38), poor parental supervision (OR = 1·85, 95%CI 1·83–1·87), maltreatment or neglect (OR = 1·34, 95%CI 1·08–1·65), attachment (OR = 1·94; 95%CI 1.93–1·95), and school bullying (OR = 2·50; 95%CI 2·03–3·08); and suggestive (class III) for peer pressure (OR = 2·11, 95%CI 2·06–2·16) and supportive school environments (OR = 0·56; 95%CI 0·55–0·57).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The evidence-based atlas of key risk and protective factors identified in this umbrella review could be used as a benchmark for advancing research, prevention, and early intervention strategies for youth crime.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001004/pdfft?md5=648bcbdbc167c8b954a8f45287d934df&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824001004-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001004\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 针对青少年犯罪的风险和保护因素,已经进行了多项系统综述和荟萃分析。本研究旨在使用总括综述方法对这些证据进行整合。结果在确定的 58 个因素中,有 11 个因素得到了高度提示性或提示性证据的支持。与下列因素相关的证据具有高度提示性(II 级):药物使用(几率比 [OR] = 2-29,95%CI 1-58-3.01)、既往犯罪史(OR = 2-03,95%CI 1-62-2-45)、道德发展(OR = 3-98,95%CI 3-57-4-39)、精神病理学(OR = 2-22,95%CI 1.40-2.69)、不良童年经历(OR = 1-37,95%CI = 1-36-1-38)、父母监管不力(OR = 1-85,95%CI 1-83-1-87)、虐待或忽视(OR = 1-34,95%CI 1-08-1-65)、依恋(OR = 1-94;95%CI 1.结论本综述中确定的关键风险和保护因素的循证图集可用作推进青少年犯罪的研究、预防和早期干预策略的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk and protective factors of youth crime: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Introduction

Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been conducted on the risk and protective factors of youth crime. This study aims to consolidate this evidence using an umbrella review methodology.

Methods

A systematic electronic search was conducted using multiple electronic databases. Strength of associations was evaluated using quantitative umbrella review criteria, and AMSTAR was used to assess the quality of the studies.

Results

Among the 58 factors identified, 11 factors were supported by highly suggestive or suggestive evidence. Evidence of association was highly suggestive (class II) for substance use (odds ratio [OR] = 2·29, 95%CI 1·58–3.01), previous history of crime (OR = 2·03, 95%CI 1·62–2·45), moral development (OR = 3·98, 95%CI 3·57–4·39), psychopathology (OR = 2·22, 95%CI 1.40–2.69), adverse childhood experiences (OR = 1·37, 95%CI = 1·36–1·38), poor parental supervision (OR = 1·85, 95%CI 1·83–1·87), maltreatment or neglect (OR = 1·34, 95%CI 1·08–1·65), attachment (OR = 1·94; 95%CI 1.93–1·95), and school bullying (OR = 2·50; 95%CI 2·03–3·08); and suggestive (class III) for peer pressure (OR = 2·11, 95%CI 2·06–2·16) and supportive school environments (OR = 0·56; 95%CI 0·55–0·57).

Conclusion

The evidence-based atlas of key risk and protective factors identified in this umbrella review could be used as a benchmark for advancing research, prevention, and early intervention strategies for youth crime.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
期刊最新文献
Factors related to help-seeking and service utilization for professional mental healthcare among young people: An umbrella review Positive health outcomes of mindfulness-based interventions for cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis Sleep and paranoia: A systematic review and meta-analysis Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrating the impact of study quality on prevalence rates Gender nonconformity and common mental health problems: A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1