利用人工智能模型评估自动照片脑电图图像集成。

Jun-Ho Moon, Min-Gyu Kim, Sung Joo Cho, Dong-Yub Ko, Hye-Won Hwang, Ji-Ae Park, Shin-Jae Lee
{"title":"利用人工智能模型评估自动照片脑电图图像集成。","authors":"Jun-Ho Moon, Min-Gyu Kim, Sung Joo Cho, Dong-Yub Ko, Hye-Won Hwang, Ji-Ae Park, Shin-Jae Lee","doi":"10.2319/010124-1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and evaluate an automated method for combining a digital photograph with a lateral cephalogram.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 985 digital photographs were collected and soft tissue landmarks were manually detected. Then 2500 lateral cephalograms were collected, and corresponding soft tissue landmarks were manually detected. Using the images and landmark identification information, two different artificial intelligence (AI) models-one for detecting soft tissue on photographs and the other for identifying soft tissue on cephalograms-were developed using different deep-learning algorithms. The digital photographs were rotated, scaled, and shifted to minimize the squared sum of distances between the soft tissue landmarks identified by the two different AI models. As a validation process, eight soft tissue landmarks were selected on digital photographs and lateral cephalometric radiographs from 100 additionally collected validation subjects. Paired t-tests were used to compare the accuracy of measures obtained between the automated and manual image integration methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The validation results showed statistically significant differences between the automated and manual methods on the upper lip and soft tissue B point. Otherwise, no statistically significant difference was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated photograph-cephalogram image integration using AI models seemed to be as reliable as manual superimposition procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493416/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of automated photograph-cephalogram image integration using artificial intelligence models.\",\"authors\":\"Jun-Ho Moon, Min-Gyu Kim, Sung Joo Cho, Dong-Yub Ko, Hye-Won Hwang, Ji-Ae Park, Shin-Jae Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2319/010124-1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and evaluate an automated method for combining a digital photograph with a lateral cephalogram.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 985 digital photographs were collected and soft tissue landmarks were manually detected. Then 2500 lateral cephalograms were collected, and corresponding soft tissue landmarks were manually detected. Using the images and landmark identification information, two different artificial intelligence (AI) models-one for detecting soft tissue on photographs and the other for identifying soft tissue on cephalograms-were developed using different deep-learning algorithms. The digital photographs were rotated, scaled, and shifted to minimize the squared sum of distances between the soft tissue landmarks identified by the two different AI models. As a validation process, eight soft tissue landmarks were selected on digital photographs and lateral cephalometric radiographs from 100 additionally collected validation subjects. Paired t-tests were used to compare the accuracy of measures obtained between the automated and manual image integration methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The validation results showed statistically significant differences between the automated and manual methods on the upper lip and soft tissue B point. Otherwise, no statistically significant difference was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated photograph-cephalogram image integration using AI models seemed to be as reliable as manual superimposition procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Angle orthodontist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493416/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Angle orthodontist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2319/010124-1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/010124-1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的开发并评估一种将数码照片与头颅侧位图相结合的自动方法:共收集了 985 张数码照片,并人工检测了软组织标志。然后收集了 2500 张侧头颅照片,并人工检测了相应的软组织地标。利用图像和地标识别信息,使用不同的深度学习算法开发了两种不同的人工智能(AI)模型,一种用于检测照片上的软组织,另一种用于识别头颅影像上的软组织。对数字照片进行旋转、缩放和移动,以最小化两种不同人工智能模型所识别的软组织地标之间的距离平方和。作为验证过程,从 100 名额外收集的验证对象的数码照片和头颅侧位X光片上选取了八个软组织地标。采用配对 t 检验来比较自动和手动图像整合方法所获得测量结果的准确性:结果:验证结果表明,在上唇和软组织 B 点上,自动和手动方法的差异具有统计学意义。结论:自动照片-脑电图图像整合方法与人工图像整合方法在上唇和软组织 B 点上的差异具有统计学意义:结论:使用人工智能模型进行自动照片-脑电图图像整合似乎与手动叠加程序一样可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of automated photograph-cephalogram image integration using artificial intelligence models.

Objectives: To develop and evaluate an automated method for combining a digital photograph with a lateral cephalogram.

Materials and methods: A total of 985 digital photographs were collected and soft tissue landmarks were manually detected. Then 2500 lateral cephalograms were collected, and corresponding soft tissue landmarks were manually detected. Using the images and landmark identification information, two different artificial intelligence (AI) models-one for detecting soft tissue on photographs and the other for identifying soft tissue on cephalograms-were developed using different deep-learning algorithms. The digital photographs were rotated, scaled, and shifted to minimize the squared sum of distances between the soft tissue landmarks identified by the two different AI models. As a validation process, eight soft tissue landmarks were selected on digital photographs and lateral cephalometric radiographs from 100 additionally collected validation subjects. Paired t-tests were used to compare the accuracy of measures obtained between the automated and manual image integration methods.

Results: The validation results showed statistically significant differences between the automated and manual methods on the upper lip and soft tissue B point. Otherwise, no statistically significant difference was found.

Conclusions: Automated photograph-cephalogram image integration using AI models seemed to be as reliable as manual superimposition procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the effect of clear twin block and traditional twin block on speech: a randomized clinical trial. Evaluation of automated photograph-cephalogram image integration using artificial intelligence models. More molar distal movement than pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography posterior space available at the root level in mandibular dentition distalization with microimplants. 3D printed indirect bonding trays: transfer accuracy of bar vs shell design in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Correlations of spheno-occipital synchondrosis, cervical vertebrae, midpalatal suture, and third molar maturation stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1