用语义相似性测验评估关系推理能力:流体智力和词汇指数的影响

IF 3.7 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Thinking Skills and Creativity Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101606
Ryunosuke Oka , Akira Utsumi , Takashi Kusumi
{"title":"用语义相似性测验评估关系推理能力:流体智力和词汇指数的影响","authors":"Ryunosuke Oka ,&nbsp;Akira Utsumi ,&nbsp;Takashi Kusumi","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated the roles of fluid intelligence, semantic knowledge, and personality using the semantic similarity test (SST), which assesses participants’ relational reasoning abilities. Based on the original SST (Stamenković et al., <em>Journal of Memory and Language</em>, 105: 108–118, 2019), in Study 1, we developed the Japanese version of the SST with 20-word pairs (e.g., “time-river”) and rubrics (e.g., “it flows” corresponds to 2 pts) to classify participants’ brief explanations into three levels (2 pts, perfectly captures the relationship of two words; 1 pt, partially captures the relationship of two words; 0 pt, bad response) for each. In Studies 2 and 4, we confirmed that the SST scores showed a weak to moderate positive correlation with both vocabulary indices (the Japanese Vocabulary Size Estimation Test and vocabulary test derived from the WAIS-IV Vocabulary subscale) and the fluid intelligence index (Raven Progressive Matrices Short); however, it did not show a positive correlation with openness. In Study 3, we confirmed that the SST had reasonable test–retest reliability. These results showed that the Japanese version of the SST is related to both semantic knowledge and fluid intelligence, but has a limited relationship with the Big Five personality traits, especially openness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 101606"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating relational reasoning ability with the Semantic Similarities Test: The impact of fluid intelligence and vocabulary indices\",\"authors\":\"Ryunosuke Oka ,&nbsp;Akira Utsumi ,&nbsp;Takashi Kusumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigated the roles of fluid intelligence, semantic knowledge, and personality using the semantic similarity test (SST), which assesses participants’ relational reasoning abilities. Based on the original SST (Stamenković et al., <em>Journal of Memory and Language</em>, 105: 108–118, 2019), in Study 1, we developed the Japanese version of the SST with 20-word pairs (e.g., “time-river”) and rubrics (e.g., “it flows” corresponds to 2 pts) to classify participants’ brief explanations into three levels (2 pts, perfectly captures the relationship of two words; 1 pt, partially captures the relationship of two words; 0 pt, bad response) for each. In Studies 2 and 4, we confirmed that the SST scores showed a weak to moderate positive correlation with both vocabulary indices (the Japanese Vocabulary Size Estimation Test and vocabulary test derived from the WAIS-IV Vocabulary subscale) and the fluid intelligence index (Raven Progressive Matrices Short); however, it did not show a positive correlation with openness. In Study 3, we confirmed that the SST had reasonable test–retest reliability. These results showed that the Japanese version of the SST is related to both semantic knowledge and fluid intelligence, but has a limited relationship with the Big Five personality traits, especially openness.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"volume\":\"53 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thinking Skills and Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124001445\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187124001445","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用语义相似性测试(SST)来评估受试者的关系推理能力,从而研究流体智力、语义知识和个性的作用。在研究1中,我们在原SST(Stamenković等人,Journal of Memory and Language, 105: 108-118, 2019)的基础上开发了日文版的SST,其中包含20个词对(如 "time-river")和评分标准(如 "it flows "对应2分),将参与者的简短解释分为三个等级(2分,完全捕捉到两个词的关系;1分,部分捕捉到两个词的关系;0分,回答不好)。在研究 2 和研究 4 中,我们证实了 SST 分数与词汇量指数(日语词汇量估计测试和源自 WAIS-IV 词汇量子量表的词汇量测试)和流体智力指数(瑞文短时渐进矩阵)呈弱到中等程度的正相关;但它与开放性并不呈正相关。在研究 3 中,我们证实了 SST 具有合理的测试再测可靠性。这些结果表明,日语版 SST 与语义知识和流体智力相关,但与大五人格特质(尤其是开放性)的关系有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating relational reasoning ability with the Semantic Similarities Test: The impact of fluid intelligence and vocabulary indices

This study investigated the roles of fluid intelligence, semantic knowledge, and personality using the semantic similarity test (SST), which assesses participants’ relational reasoning abilities. Based on the original SST (Stamenković et al., Journal of Memory and Language, 105: 108–118, 2019), in Study 1, we developed the Japanese version of the SST with 20-word pairs (e.g., “time-river”) and rubrics (e.g., “it flows” corresponds to 2 pts) to classify participants’ brief explanations into three levels (2 pts, perfectly captures the relationship of two words; 1 pt, partially captures the relationship of two words; 0 pt, bad response) for each. In Studies 2 and 4, we confirmed that the SST scores showed a weak to moderate positive correlation with both vocabulary indices (the Japanese Vocabulary Size Estimation Test and vocabulary test derived from the WAIS-IV Vocabulary subscale) and the fluid intelligence index (Raven Progressive Matrices Short); however, it did not show a positive correlation with openness. In Study 3, we confirmed that the SST had reasonable test–retest reliability. These results showed that the Japanese version of the SST is related to both semantic knowledge and fluid intelligence, but has a limited relationship with the Big Five personality traits, especially openness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
期刊最新文献
Validation and network structure of the Kaufman domains of creativity scale: A psychometric investigation in an Arabic context Creativity and motor skill learning among kindergarten children: Investigating Predictive correlations and performance differences The influence of group categorization and common ingroup identity on malevolent creativity, benevolent creativity, and neutral creativity The long-term impact of executive functions on everyday creativity among Chinese adolescents: A longitudinal mediation model of emotional resilience and creative self-efficacy Measuring parental behaviors supporting higher order thinking skills in children: A scale development study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1