Michelle W. Tong , Hon J. Yu , Maren M. Sjaastad Andreassen , Stephane Loubrie , Ana E. Rodríguez-Soto , Tyler M. Seibert , Rebecca Rakow-Penner , Anders M. Dale
{"title":"T1 加权乳腺 MRI 的纵向配准:配准算法(FLIRE)及临床应用。","authors":"Michelle W. Tong , Hon J. Yu , Maren M. Sjaastad Andreassen , Stephane Loubrie , Ana E. Rodríguez-Soto , Tyler M. Seibert , Rebecca Rakow-Penner , Anders M. Dale","doi":"10.1016/j.mri.2024.110222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>MRI is commonly used to aid breast cancer diagnosis and treatment evaluation. For patients with breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy aims to reduce the tumor size and extent of surgery necessary. The current clinical standard to measure breast tumor response on MRI uses the longest tumor diameter. Radiologists also account for other tissue properties including tumor contrast or pharmacokinetics in their assessment. Accurate longitudinal image registration of breast tissue is critical to properly compare response to treatment at different timepoints.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this study, a deformable Fast Longitudinal Image Registration (FLIRE) algorithm was optimized for breast tissue. FLIRE was then compared to the publicly available software packages with high accuracy (DRAMMS) and fast runtime (Elastix). Patients included in the study received longitudinal T<sub>1</sub><sub>-</sub>weighted MRI without fat saturation at two to six timepoints as part of asymptomatic screening (<em>n</em> = 27) or throughout neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (<em>n</em> = 32). T<sub>1</sub><sub>-</sub>weighted images were registered to the first timepoint with each algorithm.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Alignment and runtime performance were compared using two-way repeated measure ANOVAs (<em>P</em> < 0.05). Across all patients, Pearson's correlation coefficient across the entire image volume was slightly higher with statistical significance and had less variance for FLIRE (0.98 ± 0.01 stdev) compared to DRAMMS (0.97 ± 0.03 stdev) and Elastix (0.95 ± 0.03 stdev). Additionally, FLIRE runtime (10.0 mins) was 9.0 times faster than DRAMMS (89.6 mins) and 1.5 times faster than Elastix (14.5 mins) on a Linux workstation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>FLIRE demonstrates promise for time-sensitive clinical applications due to its accuracy, robustness across patients and timepoints, and speed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18165,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 110222"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X24002030/pdfft?md5=3a8823f570ed73e6dfad0e0fd6b7ec98&pid=1-s2.0-S0730725X24002030-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal registration of T1-weighted breast MRI: A registration algorithm (FLIRE) and clinical application\",\"authors\":\"Michelle W. Tong , Hon J. Yu , Maren M. Sjaastad Andreassen , Stephane Loubrie , Ana E. Rodríguez-Soto , Tyler M. Seibert , Rebecca Rakow-Penner , Anders M. Dale\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mri.2024.110222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>MRI is commonly used to aid breast cancer diagnosis and treatment evaluation. For patients with breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy aims to reduce the tumor size and extent of surgery necessary. The current clinical standard to measure breast tumor response on MRI uses the longest tumor diameter. Radiologists also account for other tissue properties including tumor contrast or pharmacokinetics in their assessment. Accurate longitudinal image registration of breast tissue is critical to properly compare response to treatment at different timepoints.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this study, a deformable Fast Longitudinal Image Registration (FLIRE) algorithm was optimized for breast tissue. FLIRE was then compared to the publicly available software packages with high accuracy (DRAMMS) and fast runtime (Elastix). Patients included in the study received longitudinal T<sub>1</sub><sub>-</sub>weighted MRI without fat saturation at two to six timepoints as part of asymptomatic screening (<em>n</em> = 27) or throughout neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (<em>n</em> = 32). T<sub>1</sub><sub>-</sub>weighted images were registered to the first timepoint with each algorithm.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Alignment and runtime performance were compared using two-way repeated measure ANOVAs (<em>P</em> < 0.05). Across all patients, Pearson's correlation coefficient across the entire image volume was slightly higher with statistical significance and had less variance for FLIRE (0.98 ± 0.01 stdev) compared to DRAMMS (0.97 ± 0.03 stdev) and Elastix (0.95 ± 0.03 stdev). Additionally, FLIRE runtime (10.0 mins) was 9.0 times faster than DRAMMS (89.6 mins) and 1.5 times faster than Elastix (14.5 mins) on a Linux workstation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>FLIRE demonstrates promise for time-sensitive clinical applications due to its accuracy, robustness across patients and timepoints, and speed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X24002030/pdfft?md5=3a8823f570ed73e6dfad0e0fd6b7ec98&pid=1-s2.0-S0730725X24002030-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X24002030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X24002030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Longitudinal registration of T1-weighted breast MRI: A registration algorithm (FLIRE) and clinical application
Purpose
MRI is commonly used to aid breast cancer diagnosis and treatment evaluation. For patients with breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy aims to reduce the tumor size and extent of surgery necessary. The current clinical standard to measure breast tumor response on MRI uses the longest tumor diameter. Radiologists also account for other tissue properties including tumor contrast or pharmacokinetics in their assessment. Accurate longitudinal image registration of breast tissue is critical to properly compare response to treatment at different timepoints.
Methods
In this study, a deformable Fast Longitudinal Image Registration (FLIRE) algorithm was optimized for breast tissue. FLIRE was then compared to the publicly available software packages with high accuracy (DRAMMS) and fast runtime (Elastix). Patients included in the study received longitudinal T1-weighted MRI without fat saturation at two to six timepoints as part of asymptomatic screening (n = 27) or throughout neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (n = 32). T1-weighted images were registered to the first timepoint with each algorithm.
Results
Alignment and runtime performance were compared using two-way repeated measure ANOVAs (P < 0.05). Across all patients, Pearson's correlation coefficient across the entire image volume was slightly higher with statistical significance and had less variance for FLIRE (0.98 ± 0.01 stdev) compared to DRAMMS (0.97 ± 0.03 stdev) and Elastix (0.95 ± 0.03 stdev). Additionally, FLIRE runtime (10.0 mins) was 9.0 times faster than DRAMMS (89.6 mins) and 1.5 times faster than Elastix (14.5 mins) on a Linux workstation.
Conclusion
FLIRE demonstrates promise for time-sensitive clinical applications due to its accuracy, robustness across patients and timepoints, and speed.
期刊介绍:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the first international multidisciplinary journal encompassing physical, life, and clinical science investigations as they relate to the development and use of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is dedicated to both basic research, technological innovation and applications, providing a single forum for communication among radiologists, physicists, chemists, biochemists, biologists, engineers, internists, pathologists, physiologists, computer scientists, and mathematicians.