{"title":"剪接体突变对接受异基因造血细胞移植的骨髓增生异常综合征和慢性粒细胞白血病患者预后的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.leukres.2024.107565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Allogeneic Hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). The impact of spliceosome mutations on allo-HCT outcome is unclear and further understanding is needed to assess the implications of this class of mutations on risk of relapse, overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in order to make decision regarding timing of allo-HCT. We examined the allo-HCT outcomes of MDS/CMML patients based on their spliceosome mutation profile to understand the impact of these mutations on transplant outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare outcomes of MDS/CMML patients with and without spliceosome mutations undergoing allo-HCT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a single institution, retrospective study of MDS/CMML patients who underwent allo-HCT with myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen at City of Hope from January 2016 to December 2021. Among them, patients who underwent molecular mutation profiling by NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) for a set of genes known to be mutated in myeloid neoplasms are included in this analysis. We compared OS, relapse free survival, NRM and acute/chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) incidence between the spliceosome-mutated and unmutated groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 258 consecutive MDS/CMML patients who underwent allo-HCT. Of these, 126 (48.8 %) patients had molecular profiling done among whom 57 (45.2 %) patients carried a spliceosome mutation. 84.9 % of patients had MDS and 55.6 % underwent a matched unrelated donor transplant. The median age for the whole cohort was 66 years (range 12–77).78.6 % and 73.7 % received RIC in the spliceosome and non-spliceosome groups, respectively. The 2-year OS for the whole cohort was 66.5 % (95 %CI 0.55–0.75) with a day 100 NRM of 7.1 % and 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse of 20 %. Grade II-IV acute GVHD at day 100 was 36.3 % (95 % CI 0.27–0.44) and any chronic GVHD at 2-years was 48.4 % (95 % CI 0.37–0.58). Patients who carried a spliceosome mutation had a significantly better 2-year survival of 83.8 % vs 55.9 % in the non-spliceosome group (P=0.002) and a better PFS of 73.7 % vs 50.0 % (P=0.007). There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse at 2-years 15.9 % vs 18.5 % (P=0.59) between two groups but the spliceosome group had a significantly lower NRM at 2-years 10.4 % vs 31.5 % (P=0.009). There was no difference in incidence of acute or chronic GVHD between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among patients with MDS or CMML who underwent allo-HCT, our study shows better OS for patients who have spliceosome mutations due to lower NRM compared to those carrying non- spliceosome mutations. This favorable outcome of the spliceosome-mutated patients could have implications for timing of allo-HCT, particularly for patients in the intermediate MDS prognostic risk groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18051,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of spliceosome mutation on outcomes of myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.leukres.2024.107565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Allogeneic Hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). The impact of spliceosome mutations on allo-HCT outcome is unclear and further understanding is needed to assess the implications of this class of mutations on risk of relapse, overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in order to make decision regarding timing of allo-HCT. We examined the allo-HCT outcomes of MDS/CMML patients based on their spliceosome mutation profile to understand the impact of these mutations on transplant outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare outcomes of MDS/CMML patients with and without spliceosome mutations undergoing allo-HCT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a single institution, retrospective study of MDS/CMML patients who underwent allo-HCT with myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen at City of Hope from January 2016 to December 2021. Among them, patients who underwent molecular mutation profiling by NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) for a set of genes known to be mutated in myeloid neoplasms are included in this analysis. We compared OS, relapse free survival, NRM and acute/chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) incidence between the spliceosome-mutated and unmutated groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 258 consecutive MDS/CMML patients who underwent allo-HCT. Of these, 126 (48.8 %) patients had molecular profiling done among whom 57 (45.2 %) patients carried a spliceosome mutation. 84.9 % of patients had MDS and 55.6 % underwent a matched unrelated donor transplant. The median age for the whole cohort was 66 years (range 12–77).78.6 % and 73.7 % received RIC in the spliceosome and non-spliceosome groups, respectively. The 2-year OS for the whole cohort was 66.5 % (95 %CI 0.55–0.75) with a day 100 NRM of 7.1 % and 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse of 20 %. Grade II-IV acute GVHD at day 100 was 36.3 % (95 % CI 0.27–0.44) and any chronic GVHD at 2-years was 48.4 % (95 % CI 0.37–0.58). Patients who carried a spliceosome mutation had a significantly better 2-year survival of 83.8 % vs 55.9 % in the non-spliceosome group (P=0.002) and a better PFS of 73.7 % vs 50.0 % (P=0.007). There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse at 2-years 15.9 % vs 18.5 % (P=0.59) between two groups but the spliceosome group had a significantly lower NRM at 2-years 10.4 % vs 31.5 % (P=0.009). There was no difference in incidence of acute or chronic GVHD between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among patients with MDS or CMML who underwent allo-HCT, our study shows better OS for patients who have spliceosome mutations due to lower NRM compared to those carrying non- spliceosome mutations. This favorable outcome of the spliceosome-mutated patients could have implications for timing of allo-HCT, particularly for patients in the intermediate MDS prognostic risk groups.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145212624001310\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145212624001310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)仍然是骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)和慢性粒细胞白血病(CMML)的唯一治愈疗法。目前还不清楚剪接体突变对异体HCT结果的影响,需要进一步了解这类突变对复发风险、总生存期(OS)和非复发死亡率(NRM)的影响,以便决定异体HCT的时机。我们根据剪接体突变情况研究了MDS/CMML患者的allo-HCT结果,以了解这些突变对移植结果的影响。目的比较有和没有剪接体突变的MDS/CMML患者接受allo-HCT的结果。方法这是一项单机构回顾性研究,研究对象是2016年1月至2021年12月期间在希望之城接受析出性或降低强度调理(RIC)方案allo-HCT的MDS/CMML患者。其中,通过 NGS(下一代测序)对一组已知在髓样瘤中发生突变的基因进行分子突变分析的患者也包括在本分析中。我们比较了剪接体突变组和未突变组的OS、无复发生存率、NRM和急性/慢性移植物抗宿主疾病(GVHD)发生率。其中,126 例(48.8%)患者进行了分子图谱分析,57 例(45.2%)患者携带剪接体突变。84.9%的患者患有 MDS,55.6%的患者接受了匹配的非亲属供体移植。在剪接体组和非剪接体组中,分别有78.6%和73.7%的患者接受了RIC治疗。全组 2 年的 OS 为 66.5%(95%CI 0.55-0.75),第 100 天的 NRM 为 7.1%,2 年累计复发率为 20%。第100天发生II-IV度急性GVHD的比例为36.3%(95 % CI 0.27-0.44),2年发生任何慢性GVHD的比例为48.4%(95 % CI 0.37-0.58)。携带剪接体突变的患者2年生存率为83.8%,非剪接体组为55.9%(P=0.002),PFS为73.7%,非剪接体组为50.0%(P=0.007)。两组患者两年后的累积复发率没有差异,分别为 15.9% vs 18.5% (P=0.59),但剪接体组患者两年后的 NRM 显著较低,分别为 10.4% vs 31.5% (P=0.009)。结论在接受allo-HCT的MDS或CMML患者中,我们的研究显示,与携带非剪接体突变的患者相比,剪接体突变的患者由于较低的NRM而获得更好的OS。剪接体突变患者的这一良好结局可能会对allo-HCT的时机产生影响,尤其是对MDS预后风险中等组的患者。
Impact of spliceosome mutation on outcomes of myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation
Introduction
Allogeneic Hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). The impact of spliceosome mutations on allo-HCT outcome is unclear and further understanding is needed to assess the implications of this class of mutations on risk of relapse, overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in order to make decision regarding timing of allo-HCT. We examined the allo-HCT outcomes of MDS/CMML patients based on their spliceosome mutation profile to understand the impact of these mutations on transplant outcomes.
Objective
To compare outcomes of MDS/CMML patients with and without spliceosome mutations undergoing allo-HCT.
Methods
This is a single institution, retrospective study of MDS/CMML patients who underwent allo-HCT with myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen at City of Hope from January 2016 to December 2021. Among them, patients who underwent molecular mutation profiling by NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) for a set of genes known to be mutated in myeloid neoplasms are included in this analysis. We compared OS, relapse free survival, NRM and acute/chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) incidence between the spliceosome-mutated and unmutated groups.
Results
We identified 258 consecutive MDS/CMML patients who underwent allo-HCT. Of these, 126 (48.8 %) patients had molecular profiling done among whom 57 (45.2 %) patients carried a spliceosome mutation. 84.9 % of patients had MDS and 55.6 % underwent a matched unrelated donor transplant. The median age for the whole cohort was 66 years (range 12–77).78.6 % and 73.7 % received RIC in the spliceosome and non-spliceosome groups, respectively. The 2-year OS for the whole cohort was 66.5 % (95 %CI 0.55–0.75) with a day 100 NRM of 7.1 % and 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse of 20 %. Grade II-IV acute GVHD at day 100 was 36.3 % (95 % CI 0.27–0.44) and any chronic GVHD at 2-years was 48.4 % (95 % CI 0.37–0.58). Patients who carried a spliceosome mutation had a significantly better 2-year survival of 83.8 % vs 55.9 % in the non-spliceosome group (P=0.002) and a better PFS of 73.7 % vs 50.0 % (P=0.007). There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse at 2-years 15.9 % vs 18.5 % (P=0.59) between two groups but the spliceosome group had a significantly lower NRM at 2-years 10.4 % vs 31.5 % (P=0.009). There was no difference in incidence of acute or chronic GVHD between the two groups.
Conclusions
Among patients with MDS or CMML who underwent allo-HCT, our study shows better OS for patients who have spliceosome mutations due to lower NRM compared to those carrying non- spliceosome mutations. This favorable outcome of the spliceosome-mutated patients could have implications for timing of allo-HCT, particularly for patients in the intermediate MDS prognostic risk groups.
期刊介绍:
Leukemia Research an international journal which brings comprehensive and current information to all health care professionals involved in basic and applied clinical research in hematological malignancies. The editors encourage the submission of articles relevant to hematological malignancies. The Journal scope includes reporting studies of cellular and molecular biology, genetics, immunology, epidemiology, clinical evaluation, and therapy of these diseases.