三肋拱桥平面外屈曲支撑系统

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Structures Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107169
{"title":"三肋拱桥平面外屈曲支撑系统","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper is concerned with the design of bracing systems for three-ribbed parabolic arch bridges against out-of-plane buckling. Typical bracing systems for the three-ribbed arch bridges include K-bracing system and X-bracing system as well as transverse bracing system. The buckling criterion of the braced funicular three-ribbed arch bridge is derived from an exact matrix stiffness method (MSM) with a 14 × 14 s-order element stiffness matrix of three-dimensional beam-column elements that allows for torsional and warping deformations. The lateral torsional buckling load and mode are given by the lowest eigenvalue and eigenvector associated with the assembled structural stability stiffness matrix. A comparison study between different bracing system configurations suggests that the three-ribbed arches with the integral K- or X-bracing system (a K/X-bracing across the three arch ribs) have lower lateral torsional buckling loads than their arch counterparts with the independent K- or X-bracing system (the adjacent arch ribs are connected by K/X-bracing respectively), because the latter ones could provide more restraint on the middle arch rib to avoid early lateral torsional instability. Further, a bracing utilization efficiency index (defined as the normalized buckling capacity over material usage for bracing system) is proposed to quantify the effect of bracing systems in improving the lateral torsional buckling capacity of arch bridges. Highly efficient bracing systems that maximize the lateral torsional buckling load of three-ribbed arch structures with the lowest bracing material usage are then recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bracing systems for three-ribbed arch bridges against out-of-plane buckling\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper is concerned with the design of bracing systems for three-ribbed parabolic arch bridges against out-of-plane buckling. Typical bracing systems for the three-ribbed arch bridges include K-bracing system and X-bracing system as well as transverse bracing system. The buckling criterion of the braced funicular three-ribbed arch bridge is derived from an exact matrix stiffness method (MSM) with a 14 × 14 s-order element stiffness matrix of three-dimensional beam-column elements that allows for torsional and warping deformations. The lateral torsional buckling load and mode are given by the lowest eigenvalue and eigenvector associated with the assembled structural stability stiffness matrix. A comparison study between different bracing system configurations suggests that the three-ribbed arches with the integral K- or X-bracing system (a K/X-bracing across the three arch ribs) have lower lateral torsional buckling loads than their arch counterparts with the independent K- or X-bracing system (the adjacent arch ribs are connected by K/X-bracing respectively), because the latter ones could provide more restraint on the middle arch rib to avoid early lateral torsional instability. Further, a bracing utilization efficiency index (defined as the normalized buckling capacity over material usage for bracing system) is proposed to quantify the effect of bracing systems in improving the lateral torsional buckling capacity of arch bridges. Highly efficient bracing systems that maximize the lateral torsional buckling load of three-ribbed arch structures with the lowest bracing material usage are then recommended.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424013213\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012424013213","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文涉及三肋抛物线拱桥的支撑系统设计,以防止平面外屈曲。三肋拱桥的典型支撑系统包括 K 支撑系统、X 支撑系统和横向支撑系统。支撑式缆索三肋拱桥的屈曲准则由精确矩阵刚度法(MSM)推导得出,该方法采用 14 × 14 s 阶三维梁柱元素刚度矩阵,允许扭转和翘曲变形。侧向扭转屈曲载荷和模式由与装配结构稳定性刚度矩阵相关的最低特征值和特征向量给出。对不同支撑系统配置的比较研究表明,采用整体 K 或 X 支撑系统(K/X 支撑横跨三条拱肋)的三肋拱门的侧向扭转屈曲载荷低于采用独立 K 或 X 支撑系统(相邻拱肋分别由 K/X 支撑连接)的拱门,因为后者可对中间拱肋提供更多约束,以避免早期侧向扭转失稳。此外,还提出了一个支撑利用效率指数(定义为支撑系统的归一化屈曲能力与材料用量之比),以量化支撑系统在提高拱桥横向扭转屈曲能力方面的效果。然后推荐了高效的支撑系统,该系统能以最少的支撑材料用量最大化三肋拱结构的横向扭转屈曲荷载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bracing systems for three-ribbed arch bridges against out-of-plane buckling

This paper is concerned with the design of bracing systems for three-ribbed parabolic arch bridges against out-of-plane buckling. Typical bracing systems for the three-ribbed arch bridges include K-bracing system and X-bracing system as well as transverse bracing system. The buckling criterion of the braced funicular three-ribbed arch bridge is derived from an exact matrix stiffness method (MSM) with a 14 × 14 s-order element stiffness matrix of three-dimensional beam-column elements that allows for torsional and warping deformations. The lateral torsional buckling load and mode are given by the lowest eigenvalue and eigenvector associated with the assembled structural stability stiffness matrix. A comparison study between different bracing system configurations suggests that the three-ribbed arches with the integral K- or X-bracing system (a K/X-bracing across the three arch ribs) have lower lateral torsional buckling loads than their arch counterparts with the independent K- or X-bracing system (the adjacent arch ribs are connected by K/X-bracing respectively), because the latter ones could provide more restraint on the middle arch rib to avoid early lateral torsional instability. Further, a bracing utilization efficiency index (defined as the normalized buckling capacity over material usage for bracing system) is proposed to quantify the effect of bracing systems in improving the lateral torsional buckling capacity of arch bridges. Highly efficient bracing systems that maximize the lateral torsional buckling load of three-ribbed arch structures with the lowest bracing material usage are then recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structures
Structures Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
17.10%
发文量
1187
期刊介绍: Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.
期刊最新文献
Efficient sensitivity analysis for structural seismic fragility assessment based on surrogate models Experimental investigation on the compression-bending performance of rubberized concrete columns confined by galvanized corrugated steel tubes Damage propagation and failure mechanism of single dome historical Masonry Mosque after February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquake doublets (Mw = 7.7 and Mw = 7.6) Seismic performance of pentagonal type aluminum alloy suspen-dome structure with large opening Comparative analysis of GFRP and CFRP bars for marine concrete: Insights into influence on the bond performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1