患者对数字药物调配助手的看法:社会经济群体比较访谈研究。

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1089/cyber.2023.0626
Kim Tenfelde, Ayla Dijkmans, Nadine Bol, Mart Kicken, Chris van der Lee, Jan de Wit, Barbara Maat
{"title":"患者对数字药物调配助手的看法:社会经济群体比较访谈研究。","authors":"Kim Tenfelde, Ayla Dijkmans, Nadine Bol, Mart Kicken, Chris van der Lee, Jan de Wit, Barbara Maat","doi":"10.1089/cyber.2023.0626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medication reconciliation, the process of documenting a patient's medication, is currently a time-consuming and labor-intensive process. To make medication reconciliation more efficient, digital assistants (DAs) offer a promising solution. Especially since human-like digital interfaces tend to be appreciated by more vulnerable populations such as patients in a low socioeconomic position (SEP). Despite the potential of DAs for low-SEP populations in particular, these groups are often not involved during the development and design phase of such digital health interventions. This exclusion may explain the lower adoption rates of digital interventions among low-SEP patients and exacerbate the so-called digital divide. We explored the perceptions and needs of patients across the SEP gradient using a participatory design approach. Patients of low-, middle-, and high-SEP backgrounds were asked to interact with a DA developed for this study and were interviewed afterward. A thematic analysis revealed seven themes regarding design, input method, comprehensibility, privacy concerns, benefits, the intention to use, and reassurance. Overall, patients were afraid to make mistakes in their medication entries and therefore valued feedback from the system or caregivers. Low-SEP patients specifically seemed to value more structured input methods when using the DA, while high-SEP patients emphasized the importance of a secure environment for the DA and sought clarity about its functionalities. Our study demonstrates the importance of involving patients across the socioeconomic gradient when developing a digital health tool and offers concrete recommendations for inclusive DA design for researchers and developers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10872,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Perspectives on a Digital Assistant for Medication Reconciliation: An Interview Study Comparing Socioeconomic Groups.\",\"authors\":\"Kim Tenfelde, Ayla Dijkmans, Nadine Bol, Mart Kicken, Chris van der Lee, Jan de Wit, Barbara Maat\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/cyber.2023.0626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Medication reconciliation, the process of documenting a patient's medication, is currently a time-consuming and labor-intensive process. To make medication reconciliation more efficient, digital assistants (DAs) offer a promising solution. Especially since human-like digital interfaces tend to be appreciated by more vulnerable populations such as patients in a low socioeconomic position (SEP). Despite the potential of DAs for low-SEP populations in particular, these groups are often not involved during the development and design phase of such digital health interventions. This exclusion may explain the lower adoption rates of digital interventions among low-SEP patients and exacerbate the so-called digital divide. We explored the perceptions and needs of patients across the SEP gradient using a participatory design approach. Patients of low-, middle-, and high-SEP backgrounds were asked to interact with a DA developed for this study and were interviewed afterward. A thematic analysis revealed seven themes regarding design, input method, comprehensibility, privacy concerns, benefits, the intention to use, and reassurance. Overall, patients were afraid to make mistakes in their medication entries and therefore valued feedback from the system or caregivers. Low-SEP patients specifically seemed to value more structured input methods when using the DA, while high-SEP patients emphasized the importance of a secure environment for the DA and sought clarity about its functionalities. Our study demonstrates the importance of involving patients across the socioeconomic gradient when developing a digital health tool and offers concrete recommendations for inclusive DA design for researchers and developers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.0626\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2023.0626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物对账是记录病人用药情况的过程,目前是一个耗时耗力的过程。为了提高用药核对的效率,数字助理(DAs)提供了一个很有前景的解决方案。特别是因为类似人类的数字界面往往会受到更多弱势群体(如社会经济地位较低(SEP)的病人)的青睐。尽管数字设备对社会经济地位较低的人群具有很大的潜力,但这些人群往往无法参与此类数字健康干预措施的开发和设计阶段。这种排斥可能是低社会经济地位患者采用数字干预措施的比例较低的原因,也可能加剧了所谓的数字鸿沟。我们采用参与式设计方法探讨了 SEP 梯度上患者的看法和需求。低、中、高 SEP 背景的患者被要求与为本研究开发的 DA 进行互动,并在互动后接受访谈。专题分析显示了七个主题,分别涉及设计、输入方法、可理解性、隐私问题、益处、使用意愿和保证。总体而言,患者害怕在输入药物时出错,因此非常重视来自系统或护理人员的反馈。低 SEP 患者在使用 DA 时似乎特别重视更有条理的输入方法,而高 SEP 患者则强调了 DA 安全环境的重要性,并希望明确其功能。我们的研究表明,在开发数字健康工具时,让不同社会经济梯度的患者参与进来非常重要,并为研究人员和开发人员提供了包容性数据采集设计的具体建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient Perspectives on a Digital Assistant for Medication Reconciliation: An Interview Study Comparing Socioeconomic Groups.

Medication reconciliation, the process of documenting a patient's medication, is currently a time-consuming and labor-intensive process. To make medication reconciliation more efficient, digital assistants (DAs) offer a promising solution. Especially since human-like digital interfaces tend to be appreciated by more vulnerable populations such as patients in a low socioeconomic position (SEP). Despite the potential of DAs for low-SEP populations in particular, these groups are often not involved during the development and design phase of such digital health interventions. This exclusion may explain the lower adoption rates of digital interventions among low-SEP patients and exacerbate the so-called digital divide. We explored the perceptions and needs of patients across the SEP gradient using a participatory design approach. Patients of low-, middle-, and high-SEP backgrounds were asked to interact with a DA developed for this study and were interviewed afterward. A thematic analysis revealed seven themes regarding design, input method, comprehensibility, privacy concerns, benefits, the intention to use, and reassurance. Overall, patients were afraid to make mistakes in their medication entries and therefore valued feedback from the system or caregivers. Low-SEP patients specifically seemed to value more structured input methods when using the DA, while high-SEP patients emphasized the importance of a secure environment for the DA and sought clarity about its functionalities. Our study demonstrates the importance of involving patients across the socioeconomic gradient when developing a digital health tool and offers concrete recommendations for inclusive DA design for researchers and developers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking is a leading peer-reviewed journal that is recognized for its authoritative research on the social, behavioral, and psychological impacts of contemporary social networking practices. The journal covers a wide range of platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, internet gaming, and e-commerce, and examines how these digital environments shape human interaction and societal norms. For over two decades, this journal has been a pioneering voice in the exploration of social networking and virtual reality, establishing itself as an indispensable resource for professionals and academics in the field. It is particularly celebrated for its swift dissemination of findings through rapid communication articles, alongside comprehensive, in-depth studies that delve into the multifaceted effects of interactive technologies on both individual behavior and broader societal trends. The journal's scope encompasses the full spectrum of impacts—highlighting not only the potential benefits but also the challenges that arise as a result of these technologies. By providing a platform for rigorous research and critical discussions, it fosters a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between technology and human behavior.
期刊最新文献
Dating App Users: Interpersonal Styles and Self-Reported Mating Success. Digital Health as a Catalyst for Mental Health Equity. Empathy Through Immersion: The Impact of 360-Degree Virtual Reality on Fostering Perspective-Taking and Sense of Oneness in the Embodiment of a Sexual Harassment Victim. Exploring the Influence of the Dark Triad on Indirect Cyber Aggression: A Longitudinal Study of a Taiwanese Sample. Support of the Dimensionality and Internal Consistency of the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale-2: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1