公开和隐藏治疗相关信息的效果;一项多重实验研究。

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology & Health Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1080/08870446.2024.2392820
Hojjat Daniali, Pia Louise Hunsbeth, Magne Arve Flaten
{"title":"公开和隐藏治疗相关信息的效果;一项多重实验研究。","authors":"Hojjat Daniali, Pia Louise Hunsbeth, Magne Arve Flaten","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2024.2392820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two experiments (E1 and E2; <i>N</i> = 44 and <i>N</i> = 52, respectively) investigated the effect of positive (PI) and neutral information (NI) about a dental procedure, and if the delivery of the information by the treatment team (open administration) or unbeknownst to the treatment team (hidden administration), affected pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a mixed design, patients undergoing drilling in a molar were randomized to the NI or PI groups. Before, during, and after treatment, patients reported their pain and stress levels. In E1 the treatment team delivered the information. In E2, an assistant not engaged in the treatment delivered the information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the PI group in E1, pain was reduced by 50 % compared to the NI group, and the effects of stress on pain were mitigated. These effects were abolished in E2. The dentist reported having displayed positive nonverbal behaviours (e.g. smiling and longer eye contact) in the PI group in E1, but not in E2.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Positive information reduced pain only when administrated openly. There was no effect of positive information administrated hidden from the treatment team. As information was similar in both experiments, factors other than the information most likely reduced pain in the PI group in E1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delivering positive information by the treatment team may generate behavioural cues which generate placebo effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of open and hidden administration of treatment-related information; a multi-experiment study.\",\"authors\":\"Hojjat Daniali, Pia Louise Hunsbeth, Magne Arve Flaten\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08870446.2024.2392820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two experiments (E1 and E2; <i>N</i> = 44 and <i>N</i> = 52, respectively) investigated the effect of positive (PI) and neutral information (NI) about a dental procedure, and if the delivery of the information by the treatment team (open administration) or unbeknownst to the treatment team (hidden administration), affected pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a mixed design, patients undergoing drilling in a molar were randomized to the NI or PI groups. Before, during, and after treatment, patients reported their pain and stress levels. In E1 the treatment team delivered the information. In E2, an assistant not engaged in the treatment delivered the information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the PI group in E1, pain was reduced by 50 % compared to the NI group, and the effects of stress on pain were mitigated. These effects were abolished in E2. The dentist reported having displayed positive nonverbal behaviours (e.g. smiling and longer eye contact) in the PI group in E1, but not in E2.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Positive information reduced pain only when administrated openly. There was no effect of positive information administrated hidden from the treatment team. As information was similar in both experiments, factors other than the information most likely reduced pain in the PI group in E1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delivering positive information by the treatment team may generate behavioural cues which generate placebo effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology & Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2024.2392820\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2024.2392820","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:两项实验(E1 和 E2;样本数分别为 44 和 52)研究了关于牙科手术的积极信息(PI)和中性信息(NI)的效果,以及治疗小组(公开管理)或治疗小组不知情的情况下(隐藏管理)提供的信息是否会影响疼痛:采用混合设计,将接受臼齿钻孔治疗的患者随机分为 NI 组和 PI 组。在治疗前、治疗中和治疗后,患者报告其疼痛和压力水平。在 E1 组中,由治疗小组提供信息。在 E2 中,由一名未参与治疗的助手提供信息:结果:在 E1 中,PI 组的疼痛比 NI 组减轻了 50%,压力对疼痛的影响也有所减轻。这些影响在 E2 中消失了。据牙医报告,在 E1 阶段,PI 组的牙医表现出了积极的非语言行为(如微笑和更长时间的眼神交流),但在 E2 阶段则没有:讨论:正面信息只有在公开发布时才会减轻疼痛。对治疗小组隐藏的正面信息没有效果。由于两个实验中的信息相似,在 E1 中,信息以外的因素很可能减轻了 PI 组的疼痛:由治疗小组提供积极信息可能会产生行为线索,从而产生安慰剂效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of open and hidden administration of treatment-related information; a multi-experiment study.

Background: Two experiments (E1 and E2; N = 44 and N = 52, respectively) investigated the effect of positive (PI) and neutral information (NI) about a dental procedure, and if the delivery of the information by the treatment team (open administration) or unbeknownst to the treatment team (hidden administration), affected pain.

Methods: Using a mixed design, patients undergoing drilling in a molar were randomized to the NI or PI groups. Before, during, and after treatment, patients reported their pain and stress levels. In E1 the treatment team delivered the information. In E2, an assistant not engaged in the treatment delivered the information.

Results: In the PI group in E1, pain was reduced by 50 % compared to the NI group, and the effects of stress on pain were mitigated. These effects were abolished in E2. The dentist reported having displayed positive nonverbal behaviours (e.g. smiling and longer eye contact) in the PI group in E1, but not in E2.

Discussion: Positive information reduced pain only when administrated openly. There was no effect of positive information administrated hidden from the treatment team. As information was similar in both experiments, factors other than the information most likely reduced pain in the PI group in E1.

Conclusion: Delivering positive information by the treatment team may generate behavioural cues which generate placebo effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
期刊最新文献
Broad versus narrow bandwidth measures of experienced automaticity for physical activity. Fluctuations in core depressive symptoms in colorectal cancer patients. A prospective, population-based PROFILES-registry study. Understanding the experiences and psychosocial support needs of caregivers of people with comorbid dementia and cancer. Improving adult eating behaviours by manipulating time perspective: a systematic review and meta-analysis. We meat again: a field study on the moderating role of location-specific consumer preferences in nudging vegetarian options.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1