Vitor Simionato Bidóia, Yanna Karoline Santos da Costa, Priscila Lupino Gratão, Caio Antonio Carbonari, Stephen Oscar Duke, Leonardo Bianco de Carvalho
{"title":"草甘膦对温室和田间抗草甘膦玉米生长和代谢参数的影响","authors":"Vitor Simionato Bidóia, Yanna Karoline Santos da Costa, Priscila Lupino Gratão, Caio Antonio Carbonari, Stephen Oscar Duke, Leonardo Bianco de Carvalho","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The potential adverse effects of glyphosate on glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops are still a matter of controversy. The effects of glyphosate at recommended application rates (either a single application of 580 g ae ha<sup>−1</sup> of glyphosate at stage V5 or a sequential application of 580 + 980 g ae ha<sup>−1</sup> at stage V3 and V7, respectively) on growth, mineral content, and metabolic parameters of GR maize (<i>Zea mays</i>) were determined in greenhouse and field studies, each replicated in different years. No effects on any growth parameter (including grain yield), mineral content (leaf and grain), grain starch, crude protein, or total lipids were found. The only significant negative effect was a slight reduction in tyrosine content of leaf tissue with the sequential treatment, however, there was no increase in shikimic or quinic acids in leaf tissue with any treatment. In a separate greenhouse experiment, there was no sign of oxidative stress, as determined by levels of chlorophylls, carotenoids, and malondialdehyde (MDA) content as well as superoxide dismutase and guaiacol peroxidase activities 4 and 8 days after treatment with 1080 g ha<sup>−1</sup> glyphosate. In fact, there was a reduction of MDA in roots of glyphosate-treated plants 4 DAT, indicating reduced oxidative stress. No aminomethylphosphonic acid, the primary degradation product of glyphosate, was found in either leaves or grain of treated plants, and no glyphosate was found in grain of treated plants from the field studies. All the results are consistent with there being no adverse effects of glyphosate on GR maize at recommended application rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of glyphosate on glyphosate-resistant maize growth and metabolic parameters in the greenhouse and field\",\"authors\":\"Vitor Simionato Bidóia, Yanna Karoline Santos da Costa, Priscila Lupino Gratão, Caio Antonio Carbonari, Stephen Oscar Duke, Leonardo Bianco de Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cft2.20308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The potential adverse effects of glyphosate on glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops are still a matter of controversy. The effects of glyphosate at recommended application rates (either a single application of 580 g ae ha<sup>−1</sup> of glyphosate at stage V5 or a sequential application of 580 + 980 g ae ha<sup>−1</sup> at stage V3 and V7, respectively) on growth, mineral content, and metabolic parameters of GR maize (<i>Zea mays</i>) were determined in greenhouse and field studies, each replicated in different years. No effects on any growth parameter (including grain yield), mineral content (leaf and grain), grain starch, crude protein, or total lipids were found. The only significant negative effect was a slight reduction in tyrosine content of leaf tissue with the sequential treatment, however, there was no increase in shikimic or quinic acids in leaf tissue with any treatment. In a separate greenhouse experiment, there was no sign of oxidative stress, as determined by levels of chlorophylls, carotenoids, and malondialdehyde (MDA) content as well as superoxide dismutase and guaiacol peroxidase activities 4 and 8 days after treatment with 1080 g ha<sup>−1</sup> glyphosate. In fact, there was a reduction of MDA in roots of glyphosate-treated plants 4 DAT, indicating reduced oxidative stress. No aminomethylphosphonic acid, the primary degradation product of glyphosate, was found in either leaves or grain of treated plants, and no glyphosate was found in grain of treated plants from the field studies. All the results are consistent with there being no adverse effects of glyphosate on GR maize at recommended application rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.20308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.20308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
草甘膦对抗草甘膦(GR)作物的潜在不利影响仍存在争议。我们在温室和田间研究中测定了草甘膦的推荐施用量(在 V5 阶段一次施用 580 g ae ha-1 草甘膦,或在 V3 和 V7 阶段分别连续施用 580 + 980 g ae ha-1 草甘膦)对 GR 玉米(Zea mays)的生长、矿物质含量和代谢参数的影响,每项研究在不同年份重复进行。没有发现任何生长参数(包括谷物产量)、矿物质含量(叶片和谷物)、谷物淀粉、粗蛋白或总脂类受到影响。唯一明显的负面影响是叶片组织中的酪氨酸含量在连续处理中略有减少,但叶片组织中的莽草酸和喹酸含量在任何处理中都没有增加。在另一项温室实验中,根据叶绿素、类胡萝卜素、丙二醛(MDA)含量以及超氧化物歧化酶和愈创木酚过氧化物酶活性测定,草甘膦 1080 克/公顷处理 4 天和 8 天后没有出现氧化应激迹象。事实上,草甘膦处理植物根部的 MDA 在 4 天后有所减少,表明氧化应激有所降低。草甘膦的主要降解产物氨甲基膦酸在处理过的植物的叶片或谷物中均未发现,在田间研究中,处理过的植物的谷物中也未发现草甘膦。所有这些结果都表明,按照建议的施用量,草甘膦不会对 GR 玉米产生不利影响。
Effects of glyphosate on glyphosate-resistant maize growth and metabolic parameters in the greenhouse and field
The potential adverse effects of glyphosate on glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops are still a matter of controversy. The effects of glyphosate at recommended application rates (either a single application of 580 g ae ha−1 of glyphosate at stage V5 or a sequential application of 580 + 980 g ae ha−1 at stage V3 and V7, respectively) on growth, mineral content, and metabolic parameters of GR maize (Zea mays) were determined in greenhouse and field studies, each replicated in different years. No effects on any growth parameter (including grain yield), mineral content (leaf and grain), grain starch, crude protein, or total lipids were found. The only significant negative effect was a slight reduction in tyrosine content of leaf tissue with the sequential treatment, however, there was no increase in shikimic or quinic acids in leaf tissue with any treatment. In a separate greenhouse experiment, there was no sign of oxidative stress, as determined by levels of chlorophylls, carotenoids, and malondialdehyde (MDA) content as well as superoxide dismutase and guaiacol peroxidase activities 4 and 8 days after treatment with 1080 g ha−1 glyphosate. In fact, there was a reduction of MDA in roots of glyphosate-treated plants 4 DAT, indicating reduced oxidative stress. No aminomethylphosphonic acid, the primary degradation product of glyphosate, was found in either leaves or grain of treated plants, and no glyphosate was found in grain of treated plants from the field studies. All the results are consistent with there being no adverse effects of glyphosate on GR maize at recommended application rates.
期刊介绍:
Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management is a peer-reviewed, international, electronic journal covering all aspects of applied crop, forage and grazinglands, and turfgrass management. The journal serves the professions related to the management of crops, forages and grazinglands, and turfgrass by publishing research, briefs, reviews, perspectives, and diagnostic and management guides that are beneficial to researchers, practitioners, educators, and industry representatives.