Charles H Bombardier, Joy F Chan, Emily Stensland, Jason Barber, Mark P Jensen
{"title":"远程医疗催眠认知疗法治疗脊髓损伤慢性疼痛的疗效、安全性和满意度:与历史对照的试点研究。","authors":"Charles H Bombardier, Joy F Chan, Emily Stensland, Jason Barber, Mark P Jensen","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2395080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context/objective: </strong>In-person hypnotic cognitive therapy (HYP-CT) is a promising treatment for chronic spinal cord injury-related pain. We describe the effects of HYP-CT delivered via Zoom (Z-HYP-CT) and compare the effects to historical controls who received hypnosis, cognitive therapy, or HYP-CT in-person.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Open pilot trial of HYP-CT versus historical controls.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Telehealth study that recruited people with chronic SCI.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults with moderate to severe chronic SCI-related pain.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Four weekly sessions of HYP-CT delivered via Zoom.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was average pain intensity on a 0-10 numerical rating scale measured at end of treatment (4 weeks) and 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included pain interference, depression, sleep, pain catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>23 individuals with SCI-related pain participated in the open trial and were compared to 21 historical controls. Average age was 54 years, 70% were male, and the majority were White. The participants were 11.6-13.1 years post-SCI and average pain intensity was 4.8-5.4/10. After Z-HYP-CT mixed-effects linear regressions showed that pain intensity was significantly less at 4 weeks (-1.28, <i>P</i> < .0001) and 12 weeks (-1.50, <i>P</i> < .0001) relative to baseline. Pain interference, depression, and pain catastrophizing also decreased significantly at both time points. There were no significant differences between the effects of Z-HYP-CT versus historical controls on any outcome variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HYP-CT delivered via telehealth was associated with reduced pain intensity and other benefits that were comparable to the effect achieved by in-person historical controls. The effects of Z-HYP-CT should be evaluated using a randomized controlled design.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy, safety, and satisfaction of telehealth-delivered hypnotic cognitive therapy for chronic pain in spinal cord injury: A pilot study with historical controls.\",\"authors\":\"Charles H Bombardier, Joy F Chan, Emily Stensland, Jason Barber, Mark P Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2024.2395080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context/objective: </strong>In-person hypnotic cognitive therapy (HYP-CT) is a promising treatment for chronic spinal cord injury-related pain. We describe the effects of HYP-CT delivered via Zoom (Z-HYP-CT) and compare the effects to historical controls who received hypnosis, cognitive therapy, or HYP-CT in-person.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Open pilot trial of HYP-CT versus historical controls.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Telehealth study that recruited people with chronic SCI.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults with moderate to severe chronic SCI-related pain.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Four weekly sessions of HYP-CT delivered via Zoom.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was average pain intensity on a 0-10 numerical rating scale measured at end of treatment (4 weeks) and 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included pain interference, depression, sleep, pain catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>23 individuals with SCI-related pain participated in the open trial and were compared to 21 historical controls. Average age was 54 years, 70% were male, and the majority were White. The participants were 11.6-13.1 years post-SCI and average pain intensity was 4.8-5.4/10. After Z-HYP-CT mixed-effects linear regressions showed that pain intensity was significantly less at 4 weeks (-1.28, <i>P</i> < .0001) and 12 weeks (-1.50, <i>P</i> < .0001) relative to baseline. Pain interference, depression, and pain catastrophizing also decreased significantly at both time points. There were no significant differences between the effects of Z-HYP-CT versus historical controls on any outcome variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HYP-CT delivered via telehealth was associated with reduced pain intensity and other benefits that were comparable to the effect achieved by in-person historical controls. The effects of Z-HYP-CT should be evaluated using a randomized controlled design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2395080\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2395080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The efficacy, safety, and satisfaction of telehealth-delivered hypnotic cognitive therapy for chronic pain in spinal cord injury: A pilot study with historical controls.
Context/objective: In-person hypnotic cognitive therapy (HYP-CT) is a promising treatment for chronic spinal cord injury-related pain. We describe the effects of HYP-CT delivered via Zoom (Z-HYP-CT) and compare the effects to historical controls who received hypnosis, cognitive therapy, or HYP-CT in-person.
Design: Open pilot trial of HYP-CT versus historical controls.
Setting: Telehealth study that recruited people with chronic SCI.
Participants: Adults with moderate to severe chronic SCI-related pain.
Interventions: Four weekly sessions of HYP-CT delivered via Zoom.
Outcome measures: The primary outcome was average pain intensity on a 0-10 numerical rating scale measured at end of treatment (4 weeks) and 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included pain interference, depression, sleep, pain catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy.
Results: 23 individuals with SCI-related pain participated in the open trial and were compared to 21 historical controls. Average age was 54 years, 70% were male, and the majority were White. The participants were 11.6-13.1 years post-SCI and average pain intensity was 4.8-5.4/10. After Z-HYP-CT mixed-effects linear regressions showed that pain intensity was significantly less at 4 weeks (-1.28, P < .0001) and 12 weeks (-1.50, P < .0001) relative to baseline. Pain interference, depression, and pain catastrophizing also decreased significantly at both time points. There were no significant differences between the effects of Z-HYP-CT versus historical controls on any outcome variable.
Conclusion: HYP-CT delivered via telehealth was associated with reduced pain intensity and other benefits that were comparable to the effect achieved by in-person historical controls. The effects of Z-HYP-CT should be evaluated using a randomized controlled design.
期刊介绍:
For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.