{"title":"德国利用天气雷达估算设计降水量:统计方法比较","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study region:</h3><p>Germany.</p></div><div><h3>Study focus:</h3><p>Estimation of precipitation return levels on various temporal scales and with high spatial resolution is crucial for risk management and hydrological applications. Weather radars may provide this information, but design precipitation estimates from these instruments suffer from estimation biases and from the limited length of the available records. Here, the performance of two statistical methods for deriving design precipitation from 20 years of radar data for Germany is investigated: (a) a method based on peaks-over-threshold and an exponential distribution, operationally used for decades to compute design precipitation in Germany (DWA); and (b) a non-asymptotic approach that was recently shown to reduce estimation uncertainties related to short records (SMEV). The most recent official design precipitation for Germany derived from station data (KOSTRA-DWD-2020) are used as a benchmark.</p></div><div><h3>New Hydrological Insights for the Region</h3><p>Design precipitation from radar data tends to be lower than those derived from stations, due to the scale mismatch (point scale versus <span><math><mrow><mo>∼</mo><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mi>km</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> of radar) and to biases in radar estimates of extremes. SMEV tends to underestimate more than DWA, especially for short durations. Larger uncertainties are reported for the DWA method, while SMEV estimates tend to be more stable and less influenced by statistical outliers. Application of the KOSTRA-DWD-2020 method on radar data leads to results closer to SMEV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221458182400301X/pdfft?md5=05b6b5cf108293b0838f2c9718dfe247&pid=1-s2.0-S221458182400301X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of design precipitation using weather radar in Germany: A comparison of statistical methods\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study region:</h3><p>Germany.</p></div><div><h3>Study focus:</h3><p>Estimation of precipitation return levels on various temporal scales and with high spatial resolution is crucial for risk management and hydrological applications. Weather radars may provide this information, but design precipitation estimates from these instruments suffer from estimation biases and from the limited length of the available records. Here, the performance of two statistical methods for deriving design precipitation from 20 years of radar data for Germany is investigated: (a) a method based on peaks-over-threshold and an exponential distribution, operationally used for decades to compute design precipitation in Germany (DWA); and (b) a non-asymptotic approach that was recently shown to reduce estimation uncertainties related to short records (SMEV). The most recent official design precipitation for Germany derived from station data (KOSTRA-DWD-2020) are used as a benchmark.</p></div><div><h3>New Hydrological Insights for the Region</h3><p>Design precipitation from radar data tends to be lower than those derived from stations, due to the scale mismatch (point scale versus <span><math><mrow><mo>∼</mo><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mi>km</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> of radar) and to biases in radar estimates of extremes. SMEV tends to underestimate more than DWA, especially for short durations. Larger uncertainties are reported for the DWA method, while SMEV estimates tend to be more stable and less influenced by statistical outliers. Application of the KOSTRA-DWD-2020 method on radar data leads to results closer to SMEV.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221458182400301X/pdfft?md5=05b6b5cf108293b0838f2c9718dfe247&pid=1-s2.0-S221458182400301X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221458182400301X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221458182400301X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimation of design precipitation using weather radar in Germany: A comparison of statistical methods
Study region:
Germany.
Study focus:
Estimation of precipitation return levels on various temporal scales and with high spatial resolution is crucial for risk management and hydrological applications. Weather radars may provide this information, but design precipitation estimates from these instruments suffer from estimation biases and from the limited length of the available records. Here, the performance of two statistical methods for deriving design precipitation from 20 years of radar data for Germany is investigated: (a) a method based on peaks-over-threshold and an exponential distribution, operationally used for decades to compute design precipitation in Germany (DWA); and (b) a non-asymptotic approach that was recently shown to reduce estimation uncertainties related to short records (SMEV). The most recent official design precipitation for Germany derived from station data (KOSTRA-DWD-2020) are used as a benchmark.
New Hydrological Insights for the Region
Design precipitation from radar data tends to be lower than those derived from stations, due to the scale mismatch (point scale versus of radar) and to biases in radar estimates of extremes. SMEV tends to underestimate more than DWA, especially for short durations. Larger uncertainties are reported for the DWA method, while SMEV estimates tend to be more stable and less influenced by statistical outliers. Application of the KOSTRA-DWD-2020 method on radar data leads to results closer to SMEV.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies publishes original research papers enhancing the science of hydrology and aiming at region-specific problems, past and future conditions, analysis, review and solutions. The journal particularly welcomes research papers that deliver new insights into region-specific hydrological processes and responses to changing conditions, as well as contributions that incorporate interdisciplinarity and translational science.