为超高分辨率肺部光子计数计算机断层扫描优化量子迭代重建。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Thoracic Imaging Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000802
Adrienn Tóth, Jordan H Chamberlin, Gregory Puthoff, Dhiraj Baruah, Jim O'Doherty, Dhruw Maisuria, Aaron M McGuire, U Joseph Schoepf, Reginald F Munden, Ismail M Kabakus
{"title":"为超高分辨率肺部光子计数计算机断层扫描优化量子迭代重建。","authors":"Adrienn Tóth, Jordan H Chamberlin, Gregory Puthoff, Dhiraj Baruah, Jim O'Doherty, Dhruw Maisuria, Aaron M McGuire, U Joseph Schoepf, Reginald F Munden, Ismail M Kabakus","doi":"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to find the optimal strength level of QIR for ultra-high-resolution (UHR) PCCT of the lung.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 24 patients who had unenhanced chest CT with the novel UHR scan protocol on the PCCT scanner between March 24, 2023 and May 18, 2023. Two sets of reconstructions were made using different slice thicknesses: standard resolution (SR, 1 mm) and ultra-high-resolution (UHR, 0.2 mm), reconstructed with all strength levels of QIR (0 to 4). Attenuation of the lung parenchyma, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed as objective criteria of image quality. Two fellowship-trained radiologists compared image quality and noise level, sharpness of the images, and the airway details using a 5-point Likert scale. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis of reader scores, and one-way repeated measures analysis of variance for comparing the objective image quality scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Objective image quality linearly improved with higher strength levels of QIR, reducing image noise by 66% from QIR-0 to QIR-4 (P<0.001). Subjective image noise was best for QIR-4 (P<0.001). Readers rated QIR-1 and QIR-2 best for SR, and QIR-2 and QIR-3 best for UHR in terms of subjective image sharpness and airway detail, without significant differences between them (P=0.48 and 0.56, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher levels of QIR provided excellent objective image quality, but readers' preference was for intermediate levels. Considering all metrics, we recommend QIR-3 for ultra-high-resolution PCCT of the lung.</p>","PeriodicalId":49974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Quantum Iterative Reconstruction for Ultra-high-resolution Photon-counting Computed Tomography of the Lung.\",\"authors\":\"Adrienn Tóth, Jordan H Chamberlin, Gregory Puthoff, Dhiraj Baruah, Jim O'Doherty, Dhruw Maisuria, Aaron M McGuire, U Joseph Schoepf, Reginald F Munden, Ismail M Kabakus\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to find the optimal strength level of QIR for ultra-high-resolution (UHR) PCCT of the lung.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 24 patients who had unenhanced chest CT with the novel UHR scan protocol on the PCCT scanner between March 24, 2023 and May 18, 2023. Two sets of reconstructions were made using different slice thicknesses: standard resolution (SR, 1 mm) and ultra-high-resolution (UHR, 0.2 mm), reconstructed with all strength levels of QIR (0 to 4). Attenuation of the lung parenchyma, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed as objective criteria of image quality. Two fellowship-trained radiologists compared image quality and noise level, sharpness of the images, and the airway details using a 5-point Likert scale. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis of reader scores, and one-way repeated measures analysis of variance for comparing the objective image quality scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Objective image quality linearly improved with higher strength levels of QIR, reducing image noise by 66% from QIR-0 to QIR-4 (P<0.001). Subjective image noise was best for QIR-4 (P<0.001). Readers rated QIR-1 and QIR-2 best for SR, and QIR-2 and QIR-3 best for UHR in terms of subjective image sharpness and airway detail, without significant differences between them (P=0.48 and 0.56, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher levels of QIR provided excellent objective image quality, but readers' preference was for intermediate levels. Considering all metrics, we recommend QIR-3 for ultra-high-resolution PCCT of the lung.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thoracic Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thoracic Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000802\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000802","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在找出肺部超高分辨率(UHR)PCCT 的最佳 QIR 强度水平:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2023 年 3 月 24 日至 2023 年 5 月 18 日期间在 PCCT 扫描仪上使用新型 UHR 扫描方案进行未增强胸部 CT 扫描的 24 名患者。使用不同的切片厚度进行了两组重建:标准分辨率(SR,1 毫米)和超高分辨率(UHR,0.2 毫米),重建时使用了所有强度级别的 QIR(0 至 4)。肺实质的衰减、噪声、信噪比(SNR)和对比度-噪声比(CNR)是评估图像质量的客观标准。两位接受过研究培训的放射科医生采用 5 点李克特量表比较了图像质量、噪声水平、图像清晰度和气道细节。读者评分的统计分析采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验,客观图像质量评分的比较采用单因素重复测量方差分析:结果:客观图像质量随着 QIR 强度的提高而线性改善,从 QIR-0 到 QIR-4,图像噪声降低了 66%(结论:QIR 强度越高,图像质量越好:较高强度的 QIR 可提供出色的客观图像质量,但读者更倾向于中等强度的 QIR。考虑到所有指标,我们推荐将 QIR-3 用于肺部超高分辨率 PCCT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing Quantum Iterative Reconstruction for Ultra-high-resolution Photon-counting Computed Tomography of the Lung.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to find the optimal strength level of QIR for ultra-high-resolution (UHR) PCCT of the lung.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 24 patients who had unenhanced chest CT with the novel UHR scan protocol on the PCCT scanner between March 24, 2023 and May 18, 2023. Two sets of reconstructions were made using different slice thicknesses: standard resolution (SR, 1 mm) and ultra-high-resolution (UHR, 0.2 mm), reconstructed with all strength levels of QIR (0 to 4). Attenuation of the lung parenchyma, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed as objective criteria of image quality. Two fellowship-trained radiologists compared image quality and noise level, sharpness of the images, and the airway details using a 5-point Likert scale. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis of reader scores, and one-way repeated measures analysis of variance for comparing the objective image quality scores.

Results: Objective image quality linearly improved with higher strength levels of QIR, reducing image noise by 66% from QIR-0 to QIR-4 (P<0.001). Subjective image noise was best for QIR-4 (P<0.001). Readers rated QIR-1 and QIR-2 best for SR, and QIR-2 and QIR-3 best for UHR in terms of subjective image sharpness and airway detail, without significant differences between them (P=0.48 and 0.56, respectively).

Conclusions: Higher levels of QIR provided excellent objective image quality, but readers' preference was for intermediate levels. Considering all metrics, we recommend QIR-3 for ultra-high-resolution PCCT of the lung.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Journal of Thoracic Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Imaging (JTI) provides authoritative information on all aspects of the use of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cardiac and pulmonary diseases. Original articles and analytical reviews published in this timely journal provide the very latest thinking of leading experts concerning the use of chest radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, ultrasound, and all other promising imaging techniques in cardiopulmonary radiology. Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: Japanese Society of Thoracic Radiology Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology European Society of Thoracic Imaging.
期刊最新文献
Spatial Resolution Fidelity Comparison Between Energy Integrating and Deep Silicon Photon Counting CT: Implications for Pulmonary Imaging. Incidental Apical Pleuroparenchymal Scarring on Computed Tomography: Diagnostic Yield, Progression, Morphologic Features and Clinical Significance. The Relationship Between Cardiac CT-based Left Atrial Structure and Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Postablation Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Within 2 Years. Left Atrial Strain for Prediction of Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking. Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression Provides Incremental Prognostic Value and Optimizes Risk Reclassification by Computed Tomography Angiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1