视觉特征绑定的神经相关性

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_02243
Tony Ro, Allison M Pierce, Michaela Porubanova, Miriam San Lucas
{"title":"视觉特征绑定的神经相关性","authors":"Tony Ro, Allison M Pierce, Michaela Porubanova, Miriam San Lucas","doi":"10.1162/jocn_a_02243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We perceive visual objects as unified although different brain areas process different features. An attentional mechanism has been proposed to be involved with feature binding, as evidenced by observations of binding errors (i.e., illusory conjunctions) when attention is diverted. However, the neural underpinnings of this feature binding are not well understood. We examined the neural mechanisms of feature binding by recording EEG during an attentionally demanding discrimination task. Unlike prestimulus alpha oscillatory activity and early ERPs (i.e., the N1 and P1 components), the N1pc, reflecting stimulus-evoked spatial attention, was reduced for errors relative to correct responses and illusory conjunctions. However, the later SPCN, reflecting visual short-term memory, was reduced for illusory conjunctions and errors compared with correct responses. Furthermore, binding errors were associated with distinct posterior lateralized activity during this 200- to 300-msec window. These results implicate a temporal binding window that integrates visual features after stimulus-evoked attention but before encoding into visual short-term memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":51081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neural Correlates of Visual Feature Binding.\",\"authors\":\"Tony Ro, Allison M Pierce, Michaela Porubanova, Miriam San Lucas\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/jocn_a_02243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We perceive visual objects as unified although different brain areas process different features. An attentional mechanism has been proposed to be involved with feature binding, as evidenced by observations of binding errors (i.e., illusory conjunctions) when attention is diverted. However, the neural underpinnings of this feature binding are not well understood. We examined the neural mechanisms of feature binding by recording EEG during an attentionally demanding discrimination task. Unlike prestimulus alpha oscillatory activity and early ERPs (i.e., the N1 and P1 components), the N1pc, reflecting stimulus-evoked spatial attention, was reduced for errors relative to correct responses and illusory conjunctions. However, the later SPCN, reflecting visual short-term memory, was reduced for illusory conjunctions and errors compared with correct responses. Furthermore, binding errors were associated with distinct posterior lateralized activity during this 200- to 300-msec window. These results implicate a temporal binding window that integrates visual features after stimulus-evoked attention but before encoding into visual short-term memory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02243\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然不同的大脑区域处理不同的特征,但我们对视觉对象的感知是统一的。有人提出,特征绑定涉及一种注意机制,当注意力转移时出现的绑定错误(即虚假连接)就是证明。然而,人们对这种特征结合的神经基础并不十分了解。我们通过在一项需要注意力的辨别任务中记录脑电图,研究了特征结合的神经机制。与刺激前的α振荡活动和早期的ERPs(即N1和P1成分)不同,反映刺激诱发的空间注意的N1pc在错误时相对于正确反应和虚幻连接时有所降低。然而,反映视觉短时记忆的 SPCN 后期分量在幻觉连接和错误时比正确反应减少。此外,在这 200 到 300 毫秒的窗口期,结合错误与明显的后侧化活动有关。这些结果表明,在刺激引起注意之后、编码到视觉短时记忆之前,存在一个整合视觉特征的时间结合窗口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neural Correlates of Visual Feature Binding.

We perceive visual objects as unified although different brain areas process different features. An attentional mechanism has been proposed to be involved with feature binding, as evidenced by observations of binding errors (i.e., illusory conjunctions) when attention is diverted. However, the neural underpinnings of this feature binding are not well understood. We examined the neural mechanisms of feature binding by recording EEG during an attentionally demanding discrimination task. Unlike prestimulus alpha oscillatory activity and early ERPs (i.e., the N1 and P1 components), the N1pc, reflecting stimulus-evoked spatial attention, was reduced for errors relative to correct responses and illusory conjunctions. However, the later SPCN, reflecting visual short-term memory, was reduced for illusory conjunctions and errors compared with correct responses. Furthermore, binding errors were associated with distinct posterior lateralized activity during this 200- to 300-msec window. These results implicate a temporal binding window that integrates visual features after stimulus-evoked attention but before encoding into visual short-term memory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
151
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience investigates brain–behavior interaction and promotes lively interchange among the mind sciences.
期刊最新文献
Attentional Refreshing in Working Memory and Its Interplay with Long-term Memory: A Behavioral and EEG Study. Experimental Manipulation of the Bilateral Posterior Parietal Cortex Strengthens Associative Memory in Healthy Participants: A Continuous Theta-burst Stimulation. Similarity Distractors Increase the Burden of Chinese Character Selection and Updating in Working Memory. Theta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Is Not Effective in Improving Working Memory Performance. Movement Strategy Moderates the Effect of Spatially Congruent Cues on the Stability of Rhythmic Bimanual Finger Movements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1