集中还是分散?供应商集中对企业财务和创新绩效的双刃剑效应

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-09-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114946
Jason Lu Jin , Liwen Wang , Kui Wang , Xiaorong Fu
{"title":"集中还是分散?供应商集中对企业财务和创新绩效的双刃剑效应","authors":"Jason Lu Jin ,&nbsp;Liwen Wang ,&nbsp;Kui Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaorong Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While firms often engage with multiple suppliers, prior research has paid limited attention to the performance consequences of supplier concentration. Drawing on transaction cost economics and the knowledge-based view, we propose differential influences of supplier concentration on different facets of firm performance. Based on a sample of listed manufacturing firms from 2012 to 2017 in China, our findings reveal that, whereas supplier concentration enhances the buyer firm’s financial performance, it decreases the innovation performance. Further, organizational slack strengthens the effect of supplier concentration on financial performance and mitigates its negative impact on innovation performance. In addition, industry competition amplifies the effects of supplier concentration on financial and innovation performance. Overall, our study demonstrates the double-edged sword effects of supplier concentration and provides a holistic understanding of its performance implications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 114946"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concentrating or dispersing? The double-edged sword effects of supplier concentration on firm financial and innovation performance\",\"authors\":\"Jason Lu Jin ,&nbsp;Liwen Wang ,&nbsp;Kui Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaorong Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While firms often engage with multiple suppliers, prior research has paid limited attention to the performance consequences of supplier concentration. Drawing on transaction cost economics and the knowledge-based view, we propose differential influences of supplier concentration on different facets of firm performance. Based on a sample of listed manufacturing firms from 2012 to 2017 in China, our findings reveal that, whereas supplier concentration enhances the buyer firm’s financial performance, it decreases the innovation performance. Further, organizational slack strengthens the effect of supplier concentration on financial performance and mitigates its negative impact on innovation performance. In addition, industry competition amplifies the effects of supplier concentration on financial and innovation performance. Overall, our study demonstrates the double-edged sword effects of supplier concentration and provides a holistic understanding of its performance implications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"186 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324004508\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324004508","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然企业经常与多个供应商打交道,但之前的研究对供应商集中带来的绩效后果关注有限。借鉴交易成本经济学和基于知识的观点,我们提出了供应商集中对企业绩效不同方面的不同影响。基于 2012 年至 2017 年中国制造业上市公司的样本,我们的研究结果表明,供应商集中会提高买方企业的财务绩效,但会降低创新绩效。此外,组织松弛加强了供应商集中对财务绩效的影响,减轻了其对创新绩效的负面影响。此外,行业竞争会放大供应商集中度对财务和创新绩效的影响。总之,我们的研究证明了供应商集中的双刃剑效应,并提供了对其绩效影响的整体理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Concentrating or dispersing? The double-edged sword effects of supplier concentration on firm financial and innovation performance

While firms often engage with multiple suppliers, prior research has paid limited attention to the performance consequences of supplier concentration. Drawing on transaction cost economics and the knowledge-based view, we propose differential influences of supplier concentration on different facets of firm performance. Based on a sample of listed manufacturing firms from 2012 to 2017 in China, our findings reveal that, whereas supplier concentration enhances the buyer firm’s financial performance, it decreases the innovation performance. Further, organizational slack strengthens the effect of supplier concentration on financial performance and mitigates its negative impact on innovation performance. In addition, industry competition amplifies the effects of supplier concentration on financial and innovation performance. Overall, our study demonstrates the double-edged sword effects of supplier concentration and provides a holistic understanding of its performance implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Content dissimilarity and online review helpfulness: Contextual insights Editorial Board Preventing algorithm aversion: People are willing to use algorithms with a learning label Agility in marketing teams: An analysis of factors influencing the entry decision into a trendy social network Socio-politically silent brands: A double edged sword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1