系统回顾英语语言教学中的会话人工智能工具:出版趋势、工具、研究方法、学习成果和前因后果

Wan Yee Winsy Lai, Ju Seong Lee
{"title":"系统回顾英语语言教学中的会话人工智能工具:出版趋势、工具、研究方法、学习成果和前因后果","authors":"Wan Yee Winsy Lai,&nbsp;Ju Seong Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This review analyzed the trends in conversational AI tools in ELT from January 2013 to November 2023. The study examined 32 papers, focusing on publication trends, tool types, research methods, learning outcomes, and factors influencing their use. Findings revealed a gradual increase in publications, with 4 (12%) from 2013 to 2021, 13 (41%) in 2022, and 15 (47%) in 2023. All studies (100%) were conducted in Asian EFL contexts. Among the AI chatbots, <em>Google Assistant</em> (25%) was the most widely used. Quasi-experimental (45%) and cross-section (41%) research designs were commonly employed. Mixed-method (50%) approaches were prevalent for data collection and analysis. Conversational AI yielded positive outcomes in affective (43%) and cognitive skills (41%). The main factors influencing user perceptions or behaviors were individual (47%) and microsystem layers (31%). Future studies should (a) include diverse contexts beyond Asia, (b) consider the use of up-to-date tools (e.g., <em>ChatGPT</em>), (c) employ rigorous experimental designs, (d) explore behavioral learning outcomes, and (e) investigate broader environmental factors. The systematic review enhances current knowledge of recent research trends, identifies environmental factors influencing conversational AI tools concentrating in ELT, and provides insights for future research and practice in this rapidly evolving field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34469,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X24000948/pdfft?md5=68635526e04d61d702e1a64da49f7651&pid=1-s2.0-S2666920X24000948-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of conversational AI tools in ELT: Publication trends, tools, research methods, learning outcomes, and antecedents\",\"authors\":\"Wan Yee Winsy Lai,&nbsp;Ju Seong Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This review analyzed the trends in conversational AI tools in ELT from January 2013 to November 2023. The study examined 32 papers, focusing on publication trends, tool types, research methods, learning outcomes, and factors influencing their use. Findings revealed a gradual increase in publications, with 4 (12%) from 2013 to 2021, 13 (41%) in 2022, and 15 (47%) in 2023. All studies (100%) were conducted in Asian EFL contexts. Among the AI chatbots, <em>Google Assistant</em> (25%) was the most widely used. Quasi-experimental (45%) and cross-section (41%) research designs were commonly employed. Mixed-method (50%) approaches were prevalent for data collection and analysis. Conversational AI yielded positive outcomes in affective (43%) and cognitive skills (41%). The main factors influencing user perceptions or behaviors were individual (47%) and microsystem layers (31%). Future studies should (a) include diverse contexts beyond Asia, (b) consider the use of up-to-date tools (e.g., <em>ChatGPT</em>), (c) employ rigorous experimental designs, (d) explore behavioral learning outcomes, and (e) investigate broader environmental factors. The systematic review enhances current knowledge of recent research trends, identifies environmental factors influencing conversational AI tools concentrating in ELT, and provides insights for future research and practice in this rapidly evolving field.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X24000948/pdfft?md5=68635526e04d61d702e1a64da49f7651&pid=1-s2.0-S2666920X24000948-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X24000948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X24000948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述分析了2013年1月至2023年11月期间英语语言教学中对话式人工智能工具的发展趋势。本研究审查了 32 篇论文,重点关注论文发表趋势、工具类型、研究方法、学习成果以及影响其使用的因素。研究结果表明,论文数量逐渐增加,2013 年至 2021 年有 4 篇(12%),2022 年有 13 篇(41%),2023 年有 15 篇(47%)。所有研究(100%)都是在亚洲的 EFL 环境中进行的。在人工智能聊天机器人中,谷歌助手(25%)的使用最为广泛。研究设计通常采用准实验法(45%)和横断面法(41%)。数据收集和分析普遍采用混合方法(50%)。对话式人工智能在情感(43%)和认知技能(41%)方面取得了积极成果。影响用户认知或行为的主要因素是个人(47%)和微系统层(31%)。未来的研究应:(a)包括亚洲以外的各种环境;(b)考虑使用最新工具(如 ChatGPT);(c)采用严格的实验设计;(d)探索行为学习结果;(e)调查更广泛的环境因素。系统性综述增强了当前对最新研究趋势的了解,确定了影响英语语言教学会话人工智能工具的环境因素,并为这一快速发展领域的未来研究和实践提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of conversational AI tools in ELT: Publication trends, tools, research methods, learning outcomes, and antecedents

This review analyzed the trends in conversational AI tools in ELT from January 2013 to November 2023. The study examined 32 papers, focusing on publication trends, tool types, research methods, learning outcomes, and factors influencing their use. Findings revealed a gradual increase in publications, with 4 (12%) from 2013 to 2021, 13 (41%) in 2022, and 15 (47%) in 2023. All studies (100%) were conducted in Asian EFL contexts. Among the AI chatbots, Google Assistant (25%) was the most widely used. Quasi-experimental (45%) and cross-section (41%) research designs were commonly employed. Mixed-method (50%) approaches were prevalent for data collection and analysis. Conversational AI yielded positive outcomes in affective (43%) and cognitive skills (41%). The main factors influencing user perceptions or behaviors were individual (47%) and microsystem layers (31%). Future studies should (a) include diverse contexts beyond Asia, (b) consider the use of up-to-date tools (e.g., ChatGPT), (c) employ rigorous experimental designs, (d) explore behavioral learning outcomes, and (e) investigate broader environmental factors. The systematic review enhances current knowledge of recent research trends, identifies environmental factors influencing conversational AI tools concentrating in ELT, and provides insights for future research and practice in this rapidly evolving field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Enhancing data analysis and programming skills through structured prompt training: The impact of generative AI in engineering education Understanding the practices, perceptions, and (dis)trust of generative AI among instructors: A mixed-methods study in the U.S. higher education Technological self-efficacy and sense of coherence: Key drivers in teachers' AI acceptance and adoption The influence of AI literacy on complex problem-solving skills through systematic thinking skills and intuition thinking skills: An empirical study in Thai gen Z accounting students Psychometrics of an Elo-based large-scale online learning system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1