中国城市基础设施投资的空间化:干部任期、政治竞争和政府付费公私合作的不均衡地理格局

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Cities Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105404
{"title":"中国城市基础设施投资的空间化:干部任期、政治竞争和政府付费公私合作的不均衡地理格局","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Existing theory of urban growth machine has been criticized for its inherent tendency to over-emphasize the external forces of capital and globalization. Recent attempts have been made to examine the endogenous nature of China’s pro-growth politics, with competing viewpoints stressing intensive central-local fiscal relations as macro-level factors and the micro-level political considerations of local cadres. This research enriches the literature on urban pro-growth politics through an investigation of the uneven development of China's government-pays public-private partnerships (PPPs). It focuses on the individual characteristics of local cadres and critically examines the effects of different sources of promotion pressure on the development of government-pays PPPs. Based on a prefectural-level panel dataset from 2014 to 2018, the empirical analysis shows that the development of government-pays PPPs is driven by the promotion pressure of local cadres for career advancement. However, the promotion pressure of local cadres is mainly derived from their frequent cadre turnover and their inner impulse of competing with others, rather than from the actual improvement of socioeconomic performance. Additionally, the political considerations of local cadres are found to be heterogeneous according to region-specific conditions including the level of economic development, the degree of marketization, and the legacy of state socialism. Findings of this research call for greater attention paid to the variety and effectiveness of local cadres' promotion pressure as the underlying factors influencing their investment behaviors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatializing urban infrastructure investment in China: Cadre tenure, political competition, and uneven geography of government-pays public-private partnerships\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Existing theory of urban growth machine has been criticized for its inherent tendency to over-emphasize the external forces of capital and globalization. Recent attempts have been made to examine the endogenous nature of China’s pro-growth politics, with competing viewpoints stressing intensive central-local fiscal relations as macro-level factors and the micro-level political considerations of local cadres. This research enriches the literature on urban pro-growth politics through an investigation of the uneven development of China's government-pays public-private partnerships (PPPs). It focuses on the individual characteristics of local cadres and critically examines the effects of different sources of promotion pressure on the development of government-pays PPPs. Based on a prefectural-level panel dataset from 2014 to 2018, the empirical analysis shows that the development of government-pays PPPs is driven by the promotion pressure of local cadres for career advancement. However, the promotion pressure of local cadres is mainly derived from their frequent cadre turnover and their inner impulse of competing with others, rather than from the actual improvement of socioeconomic performance. Additionally, the political considerations of local cadres are found to be heterogeneous according to region-specific conditions including the level of economic development, the degree of marketization, and the legacy of state socialism. Findings of this research call for greater attention paid to the variety and effectiveness of local cadres' promotion pressure as the underlying factors influencing their investment behaviors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124006188\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124006188","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有的城市增长机制理论因其过度强调资本和全球化等外部力量的内在倾向而受到批评。近来有人尝试研究中国促进增长政治的内生性,有观点强调作为宏观因素的密集型中央与地方财政关系,也有观点强调地方干部的微观政治考量。本研究通过对中国政府付费公私合作伙伴关系(PPP)发展不平衡的调查,丰富了有关城市促进增长政治的文献。该研究关注地方干部的个体特征,并批判性地考察了不同来源的晋升压力对政府付费公私伙伴关系发展的影响。基于2014年至2018年的县级面板数据集,实证分析表明,政府付费型PPP的发展受到地方干部职业晋升压力的驱动。然而,地方干部的晋升压力主要来源于其频繁的干部流动和与人竞争的内心冲动,而非社会经济绩效的实际提升。此外,研究还发现,地方干部的政治考量因地区的具体条件而异,包括经济发展水平、市场化程度和国家社会主义的遗留问题。本研究的结果呼吁人们更加关注地方干部晋升压力的多样性和有效性,因为这是影响其投资行为的根本因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spatializing urban infrastructure investment in China: Cadre tenure, political competition, and uneven geography of government-pays public-private partnerships

Existing theory of urban growth machine has been criticized for its inherent tendency to over-emphasize the external forces of capital and globalization. Recent attempts have been made to examine the endogenous nature of China’s pro-growth politics, with competing viewpoints stressing intensive central-local fiscal relations as macro-level factors and the micro-level political considerations of local cadres. This research enriches the literature on urban pro-growth politics through an investigation of the uneven development of China's government-pays public-private partnerships (PPPs). It focuses on the individual characteristics of local cadres and critically examines the effects of different sources of promotion pressure on the development of government-pays PPPs. Based on a prefectural-level panel dataset from 2014 to 2018, the empirical analysis shows that the development of government-pays PPPs is driven by the promotion pressure of local cadres for career advancement. However, the promotion pressure of local cadres is mainly derived from their frequent cadre turnover and their inner impulse of competing with others, rather than from the actual improvement of socioeconomic performance. Additionally, the political considerations of local cadres are found to be heterogeneous according to region-specific conditions including the level of economic development, the degree of marketization, and the legacy of state socialism. Findings of this research call for greater attention paid to the variety and effectiveness of local cadres' promotion pressure as the underlying factors influencing their investment behaviors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
期刊最新文献
How do complete streets policies and legislative ordinances implement explicit wording regarding low-income populations and communities of color? A qualitative analysis Hot and bothered: Exploring the effect of heat on pedestrian route choice behavior and accessibility Does homeownership improve physical health? Evidence from a quasi-experiment in Hong Kong The recovery from the pandemic: A spatial-temporal analysis on the changes in mobility and public attitude in Singapore How to build vibrant communities by utilizing functional zones? A community-detection-based approach for revealing the association between land use and community vibrancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1