评估企业零净过渡途径可信度的经济基础

IF 12.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Business Strategy and The Environment Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1002/bse.3951
Keith Jin Deng Chan, Bon Cheung, Louis Yue Shen
{"title":"评估企业零净过渡途径可信度的经济基础","authors":"Keith Jin Deng Chan, Bon Cheung, Louis Yue Shen","doi":"10.1002/bse.3951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The G20 has highlighted the urgency and importance of financing net zero transition. Investors, however, lack a systematic framework to assess the credibility (incentive‐compatibility) of corporate transition claims. As such, negative screening based on current GHG emissions or even sectors remains a dominant climate investment strategy. In response, this paper develops an economic foundation for credible corporate net zero transition. Our model shows that, besides its current emissions, both a firm's transition capacity and urgency should be considered when assessing its likelihood of attaining net zero; interestingly, it shows how the concavity of its transition pathway may serve as a litmus test. Finally, we discuss how the Task Force on Climate‐Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework can be utilized for credibility assessment of corporate transition pathways. Our findings and recommendations are one of the first attempts to address the market call for systematic approaches to evaluate forward‐looking climate mitigation claims.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An economic foundation for assessing the credibility of corporate net zero transition pathways\",\"authors\":\"Keith Jin Deng Chan, Bon Cheung, Louis Yue Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bse.3951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The G20 has highlighted the urgency and importance of financing net zero transition. Investors, however, lack a systematic framework to assess the credibility (incentive‐compatibility) of corporate transition claims. As such, negative screening based on current GHG emissions or even sectors remains a dominant climate investment strategy. In response, this paper develops an economic foundation for credible corporate net zero transition. Our model shows that, besides its current emissions, both a firm's transition capacity and urgency should be considered when assessing its likelihood of attaining net zero; interestingly, it shows how the concavity of its transition pathway may serve as a litmus test. Finally, we discuss how the Task Force on Climate‐Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework can be utilized for credibility assessment of corporate transition pathways. Our findings and recommendations are one of the first attempts to address the market call for systematic approaches to evaluate forward‐looking climate mitigation claims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3951\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3951","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20 国集团强调了为净零过渡提供资金的紧迫性和重要性。然而,投资者缺乏一个系统的框架来评估企业转型主张的可信度(激励相容性)。因此,基于当前温室气体排放量甚至行业的负面筛选仍是气候投资的主要策略。作为回应,本文为可信的企业净零过渡奠定了经济基础。我们的模型表明,在评估企业实现净零排放的可能性时,除了考虑其当前的排放量外,还应该考虑其转型能力和紧迫性;有趣的是,我们的模型还表明了企业转型途径的凹凸性可以作为试金石。最后,我们讨论了如何利用气候相关财务披露工作组(TCFD)框架对企业转型途径进行可信度评估。我们的研究结果和建议是响应市场呼吁,采用系统方法评估前瞻性气候减缓主张的首次尝试之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An economic foundation for assessing the credibility of corporate net zero transition pathways
The G20 has highlighted the urgency and importance of financing net zero transition. Investors, however, lack a systematic framework to assess the credibility (incentive‐compatibility) of corporate transition claims. As such, negative screening based on current GHG emissions or even sectors remains a dominant climate investment strategy. In response, this paper develops an economic foundation for credible corporate net zero transition. Our model shows that, besides its current emissions, both a firm's transition capacity and urgency should be considered when assessing its likelihood of attaining net zero; interestingly, it shows how the concavity of its transition pathway may serve as a litmus test. Finally, we discuss how the Task Force on Climate‐Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework can be utilized for credibility assessment of corporate transition pathways. Our findings and recommendations are one of the first attempts to address the market call for systematic approaches to evaluate forward‐looking climate mitigation claims.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Delving into the influence of sustainability strategy: Exploring the influence of sustainability committees on company performance Gamification for sustainable consumption: A state‐of‐the‐art overview and future agenda What is in a Rating? Exploring the Link Between the Italian Legality Rating and Earnings Management Net‐zero policy and forward default risk in the energy sector: Evidence of corporate environmentalism using (a)symmetric models Sustainable strategies and circular economy ecosystems: A literature review and future research agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1