与抓握环境有关的不确定性会改变物体操作中预期机制和反馈机制的相对贡献

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuropsychologia Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108996
Swarnab Dutta, Varadhan SKM
{"title":"与抓握环境有关的不确定性会改变物体操作中预期机制和反馈机制的相对贡献","authors":"Swarnab Dutta,&nbsp;Varadhan SKM","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Predictive control within dexterous object manipulation while allowing for the choice of contact points has been shown to employ a predominantly feedback-based force modulation. The anticipation is thought to be facilitated through the internal representation of the object dynamics being integrated and updated on a trial-to-trial basis with the feedback of contact locations on the object. This is as opposed to the classically studied memory representation-based fingertip force control for grasping with pre-selected contact locations. We designed a study to examine this grasp context-dependent asymmetry in sensorimotor integration by introducing binary uncertainty about the grasp type before movement initiation within the framework of motor planning. An inverted T-shaped instrumented object was presented to 24 participants as the manipulandum, and they were asked to reach, grasp, and lift it while minimising the peak roll. We dissociated the planning and the execution phases by pseudo-randomly manipulating the availability of visual contact cues on the object after movement onset. We analysed both derived as well as direct kinetic and kinematic measures of the grasp during the loading phase to understand the anticipatory coordination. Our findings suggest that uncertainty about the grasp context during movement preparation resulted in a shift towards feedback-based mechanisms for grasp force modulation despite the persistence of visual cues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 108996"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grasp context-dependent uncertainty alters the relative contribution of anticipatory and feedback-based mechanisms in object manipulation\",\"authors\":\"Swarnab Dutta,&nbsp;Varadhan SKM\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Predictive control within dexterous object manipulation while allowing for the choice of contact points has been shown to employ a predominantly feedback-based force modulation. The anticipation is thought to be facilitated through the internal representation of the object dynamics being integrated and updated on a trial-to-trial basis with the feedback of contact locations on the object. This is as opposed to the classically studied memory representation-based fingertip force control for grasping with pre-selected contact locations. We designed a study to examine this grasp context-dependent asymmetry in sensorimotor integration by introducing binary uncertainty about the grasp type before movement initiation within the framework of motor planning. An inverted T-shaped instrumented object was presented to 24 participants as the manipulandum, and they were asked to reach, grasp, and lift it while minimising the peak roll. We dissociated the planning and the execution phases by pseudo-randomly manipulating the availability of visual contact cues on the object after movement onset. We analysed both derived as well as direct kinetic and kinematic measures of the grasp during the loading phase to understand the anticipatory coordination. Our findings suggest that uncertainty about the grasp context during movement preparation resulted in a shift towards feedback-based mechanisms for grasp force modulation despite the persistence of visual cues.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychologia\",\"volume\":\"204 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108996\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224002112\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224002112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在灵巧的物体操作中,预测控制在允许选择接触点的同时,主要采用基于反馈的力调制。这种预测被认为是通过物体动态的内部表征与物体上接触位置的反馈进行整合,并在逐次试验的基础上进行更新来实现的。这与经典研究中基于记忆表征的指尖力控制不同,后者是通过预先选择的接触位置进行抓取。我们设计了一项研究,在运动规划的框架内,通过在运动开始前引入抓取类型的二进制不确定性,来检验传感器运动整合中这种依赖于抓取情境的不对称性。我们向 24 名参与者展示了一个倒 T 形的器械物体作为操纵杆,并要求他们伸手、抓住并举起该物体,同时尽量减小滚动峰值。我们通过伪随机操纵运动开始后物体上视觉接触线索的可用性,将计划和执行阶段分离开来。我们分析了加载阶段抓握动作的推导以及直接的动力学和运动学测量,以了解预期协调性。我们的研究结果表明,尽管视觉线索持续存在,但运动准备过程中抓握环境的不确定性导致抓握力调节机制转向基于反馈的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Grasp context-dependent uncertainty alters the relative contribution of anticipatory and feedback-based mechanisms in object manipulation

Predictive control within dexterous object manipulation while allowing for the choice of contact points has been shown to employ a predominantly feedback-based force modulation. The anticipation is thought to be facilitated through the internal representation of the object dynamics being integrated and updated on a trial-to-trial basis with the feedback of contact locations on the object. This is as opposed to the classically studied memory representation-based fingertip force control for grasping with pre-selected contact locations. We designed a study to examine this grasp context-dependent asymmetry in sensorimotor integration by introducing binary uncertainty about the grasp type before movement initiation within the framework of motor planning. An inverted T-shaped instrumented object was presented to 24 participants as the manipulandum, and they were asked to reach, grasp, and lift it while minimising the peak roll. We dissociated the planning and the execution phases by pseudo-randomly manipulating the availability of visual contact cues on the object after movement onset. We analysed both derived as well as direct kinetic and kinematic measures of the grasp during the loading phase to understand the anticipatory coordination. Our findings suggest that uncertainty about the grasp context during movement preparation resulted in a shift towards feedback-based mechanisms for grasp force modulation despite the persistence of visual cues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Spatiotemporal correlates of emotional conflict processing in typically developing adolescents using magnetoencephalography Primary manipulation knowledge of objects is associated with the functional coupling of pMTG and aIPS Temporal dynamics of implicit moral evaluation: From empathy for pain to mentalizing processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1