城市公园中更多非正式植被的偏好:法国人对结构需求的阻碍作用

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Landscape and Urban Planning Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105177
{"title":"城市公园中更多非正式植被的偏好:法国人对结构需求的阻碍作用","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p></p><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><p>In the context of global urbanisation, urban green spaces (UGS) serve as the primary means of direct contact with nature for many people. The design and management of urban parks should aim to maximise their ecological functions and services, while considering the well-being and connection with nature of urban residents. Despite extensive research into the factors that influence urban dwellers’ appreciation of UGS, our understanding of the individual characteristics that shape preferences for different types of urban green spaces remains limited.</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>An important characteristic of UGS is the extent to which their vegetation appears or not ‘formal’, i.e. particularly geometrically designed with a high presence of symmetry, with clear straight or circular lines. The degree to which urban dwellers prefer more formal green spaces may be related to their need for structure (NFS), a psychological trait that refers to an individual’s preference for order, predictability, and clarity in their environment and activities. To investigate the relationship between NFS and the preferences for the degree of ‘formalism’ of UGS, we conducted a survey with a large sample (N = 1,592) of the French general population. Participants were presented with a photo-questionnaire of real public park settings that varied in their degree of formalism, i.e. from highly structured, symmetrical layouts with geometrically cut vegetation to more irregular layouts. They were asked questions assessing their NFS, their connection with nature (CWN), an individual characteristic known to be associated with a preference for more informal environments, as well as the reasons for preferring more formal or more informal parks.</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>Our multivariate analysis showed that NFS negatively predicted a preference for more informal urban parks, while we confirmed that CWN was a strong positive predictor of this preference. Textual analysis showed that both individuals high and low in NFS who preferred more formal UGS described their preference in relation with ‘order’ and ‘organization’, but high-NFS respondents mentioned human care (e.g. cleanness, tidiness) and geometrical order (geometry, form, structure) more frequently than other respondents.</p></span></li><li><span>4.</span><span><p>Individuals with a higher NFS tend to value more geometrically ordered urban parks, while those with a higher connection with nature tend to prefer more informal urban parks. To reconcile these conflicting preferences, parks could more often be designed with distinct areas of varying degrees of formalism. Alternatively, parks with a moderate level of formalism, well-defined structure, and lush vegetation could serve as a favorable compromise that meets the diverse preferences of residents and allows a variety of urban dwellers to experience nature and the associated health and well-being benefits.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001762/pdfft?md5=d6323b5950be8ab7aefb35fad7b21ea6&pid=1-s2.0-S0169204624001762-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preference for more informal vegetation in urban parks: The impeding role of need for structure among the French population\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p></p><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><p>In the context of global urbanisation, urban green spaces (UGS) serve as the primary means of direct contact with nature for many people. The design and management of urban parks should aim to maximise their ecological functions and services, while considering the well-being and connection with nature of urban residents. Despite extensive research into the factors that influence urban dwellers’ appreciation of UGS, our understanding of the individual characteristics that shape preferences for different types of urban green spaces remains limited.</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>An important characteristic of UGS is the extent to which their vegetation appears or not ‘formal’, i.e. particularly geometrically designed with a high presence of symmetry, with clear straight or circular lines. The degree to which urban dwellers prefer more formal green spaces may be related to their need for structure (NFS), a psychological trait that refers to an individual’s preference for order, predictability, and clarity in their environment and activities. To investigate the relationship between NFS and the preferences for the degree of ‘formalism’ of UGS, we conducted a survey with a large sample (N = 1,592) of the French general population. Participants were presented with a photo-questionnaire of real public park settings that varied in their degree of formalism, i.e. from highly structured, symmetrical layouts with geometrically cut vegetation to more irregular layouts. They were asked questions assessing their NFS, their connection with nature (CWN), an individual characteristic known to be associated with a preference for more informal environments, as well as the reasons for preferring more formal or more informal parks.</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>Our multivariate analysis showed that NFS negatively predicted a preference for more informal urban parks, while we confirmed that CWN was a strong positive predictor of this preference. Textual analysis showed that both individuals high and low in NFS who preferred more formal UGS described their preference in relation with ‘order’ and ‘organization’, but high-NFS respondents mentioned human care (e.g. cleanness, tidiness) and geometrical order (geometry, form, structure) more frequently than other respondents.</p></span></li><li><span>4.</span><span><p>Individuals with a higher NFS tend to value more geometrically ordered urban parks, while those with a higher connection with nature tend to prefer more informal urban parks. To reconcile these conflicting preferences, parks could more often be designed with distinct areas of varying degrees of formalism. Alternatively, parks with a moderate level of formalism, well-defined structure, and lush vegetation could serve as a favorable compromise that meets the diverse preferences of residents and allows a variety of urban dwellers to experience nature and the associated health and well-being benefits.</p></span></li></ul></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape and Urban Planning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001762/pdfft?md5=d6323b5950be8ab7aefb35fad7b21ea6&pid=1-s2.0-S0169204624001762-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape and Urban Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001762\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624001762","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1.在全球城市化的背景下,城市绿地(UGS)成为许多人直接接触自然的主要途径。城市公园的设计和管理应旨在最大限度地发挥其生态功能和服务,同时考虑到城市居民的福祉以及与自然的联系。2. 城市绿地的一个重要特征是其植被的 "正规 "与否,即特别是几何设计,具有高度对称性、清晰的直线或圆线。城市居民喜欢正规绿地的程度可能与他们对结构的需求(NFS)有关,NFS 是一种心理特征,指个人对环境和活动中的秩序、可预测性和清晰度的偏好。为了研究 NFS 与对 UGS "正规化 "程度的偏好之间的关系,我们在法国普通人群中进行了一项大样本调查(样本数 = 1,592)。我们向参与者发放了一份照片调查问卷,内容是真实的公共公园环境,这些公园的形式主义程度各不相同,既有高度结构化、对称布局、几何切割植被,也有更不规则的布局。我们的多变量分析表明,NFS 对偏好更非正式的城市公园有负面预测作用,而 CWN 则对这种偏好有很强的正面预测作用。文本分析表明,国家森林覆盖率高和国家森林覆盖率低的受访者都倾向于选择更正规的城市公园,但国家森林覆盖率高的受访者比其他受访者更常提到人类关怀(如清洁、整齐)和几何秩序(几何、形式、结构)。为了调和这些相互冲突的偏好,公园可以更多地设计成不同程度的形式化区域。另外,形式感适中、结构清晰、植被茂盛的公园也可以作为一种有利的折中方案,既能满足居民的不同偏好,又能让不同的城市居民体验大自然以及相关的健康和福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preference for more informal vegetation in urban parks: The impeding role of need for structure among the French population

  • 1.

    In the context of global urbanisation, urban green spaces (UGS) serve as the primary means of direct contact with nature for many people. The design and management of urban parks should aim to maximise their ecological functions and services, while considering the well-being and connection with nature of urban residents. Despite extensive research into the factors that influence urban dwellers’ appreciation of UGS, our understanding of the individual characteristics that shape preferences for different types of urban green spaces remains limited.

  • 2.

    An important characteristic of UGS is the extent to which their vegetation appears or not ‘formal’, i.e. particularly geometrically designed with a high presence of symmetry, with clear straight or circular lines. The degree to which urban dwellers prefer more formal green spaces may be related to their need for structure (NFS), a psychological trait that refers to an individual’s preference for order, predictability, and clarity in their environment and activities. To investigate the relationship between NFS and the preferences for the degree of ‘formalism’ of UGS, we conducted a survey with a large sample (N = 1,592) of the French general population. Participants were presented with a photo-questionnaire of real public park settings that varied in their degree of formalism, i.e. from highly structured, symmetrical layouts with geometrically cut vegetation to more irregular layouts. They were asked questions assessing their NFS, their connection with nature (CWN), an individual characteristic known to be associated with a preference for more informal environments, as well as the reasons for preferring more formal or more informal parks.

  • 3.

    Our multivariate analysis showed that NFS negatively predicted a preference for more informal urban parks, while we confirmed that CWN was a strong positive predictor of this preference. Textual analysis showed that both individuals high and low in NFS who preferred more formal UGS described their preference in relation with ‘order’ and ‘organization’, but high-NFS respondents mentioned human care (e.g. cleanness, tidiness) and geometrical order (geometry, form, structure) more frequently than other respondents.

  • 4.

    Individuals with a higher NFS tend to value more geometrically ordered urban parks, while those with a higher connection with nature tend to prefer more informal urban parks. To reconcile these conflicting preferences, parks could more often be designed with distinct areas of varying degrees of formalism. Alternatively, parks with a moderate level of formalism, well-defined structure, and lush vegetation could serve as a favorable compromise that meets the diverse preferences of residents and allows a variety of urban dwellers to experience nature and the associated health and well-being benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
期刊最新文献
A novel method of urban landscape perception based on biological vision process Neighborhood environmental conditions and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: A network analysis in Hong Kong adults Evaluating objective and perceived ecosystem service in urban context: An indirect method based on housing market ‘It’s not necessarily a social space’ − Institutions, power and nature’s wellbeing benefits in the context of diverse inner-city neighbourhoods Air regulation service is affected by green areas cover and fragmentation: An analysis using demand, supply and flow during COVID-19 quarantine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1