{"title":"非洲国家是否避免了自然资源对社会凝聚力的诅咒?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The interest in social cohesion as a key driver of inclusive societies, and the pillar of sustainable economic development is still very much alive. However, the strong socio-cultural heterogeneity between social groups, conflicts, coups and socio-political crisis reinforces evidence of an undermining of social cohesion in Africa. Using system Generalized Method of Moments dynamic techniques, this paper analyses the effects of natural resource dependence on social cohesion and the underlying mechanisms in a sample of 33 African countries over the period 1990–2020. The results show that natural resources are associated negatively with social cohesion in Africa. However, the elasticity associated with point resources is greater and more significant than that for diffuse resources. Results are robust to many robustness checks, such as the alternative strategy, which combines alternative natural resources and social cohesion measures, addition of other control variables and by using outlier analysis. The human capital, institutional quality and inequality are the main channels through which natural resources affect cooperation and respect among different identity-based groups in Africa. Findings suggest further evidence about natural resources effects and provide law enforcement reform to improve human capital, institutional quality and reduce inequality, which is necessary in strengthening social cohesion in Africa. One potential pathway for such policies could focus on expanding opportunities for groups facing barriers that undermine their contribution to society, participation in decision-making and self-esteem. Therefore, African governments should improve the management of natural resources to ensure better implementation of public policies and support capacity-building and infrastructure programmes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do African countries avoid the curse of natural resources on social cohesion?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The interest in social cohesion as a key driver of inclusive societies, and the pillar of sustainable economic development is still very much alive. However, the strong socio-cultural heterogeneity between social groups, conflicts, coups and socio-political crisis reinforces evidence of an undermining of social cohesion in Africa. Using system Generalized Method of Moments dynamic techniques, this paper analyses the effects of natural resource dependence on social cohesion and the underlying mechanisms in a sample of 33 African countries over the period 1990–2020. The results show that natural resources are associated negatively with social cohesion in Africa. However, the elasticity associated with point resources is greater and more significant than that for diffuse resources. Results are robust to many robustness checks, such as the alternative strategy, which combines alternative natural resources and social cohesion measures, addition of other control variables and by using outlier analysis. The human capital, institutional quality and inequality are the main channels through which natural resources affect cooperation and respect among different identity-based groups in Africa. Findings suggest further evidence about natural resources effects and provide law enforcement reform to improve human capital, institutional quality and reduce inequality, which is necessary in strengthening social cohesion in Africa. One potential pathway for such policies could focus on expanding opportunities for groups facing barriers that undermine their contribution to society, participation in decision-making and self-esteem. Therefore, African governments should improve the management of natural resources to ensure better implementation of public policies and support capacity-building and infrastructure programmes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724006585\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724006585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do African countries avoid the curse of natural resources on social cohesion?
The interest in social cohesion as a key driver of inclusive societies, and the pillar of sustainable economic development is still very much alive. However, the strong socio-cultural heterogeneity between social groups, conflicts, coups and socio-political crisis reinforces evidence of an undermining of social cohesion in Africa. Using system Generalized Method of Moments dynamic techniques, this paper analyses the effects of natural resource dependence on social cohesion and the underlying mechanisms in a sample of 33 African countries over the period 1990–2020. The results show that natural resources are associated negatively with social cohesion in Africa. However, the elasticity associated with point resources is greater and more significant than that for diffuse resources. Results are robust to many robustness checks, such as the alternative strategy, which combines alternative natural resources and social cohesion measures, addition of other control variables and by using outlier analysis. The human capital, institutional quality and inequality are the main channels through which natural resources affect cooperation and respect among different identity-based groups in Africa. Findings suggest further evidence about natural resources effects and provide law enforcement reform to improve human capital, institutional quality and reduce inequality, which is necessary in strengthening social cohesion in Africa. One potential pathway for such policies could focus on expanding opportunities for groups facing barriers that undermine their contribution to society, participation in decision-making and self-esteem. Therefore, African governments should improve the management of natural resources to ensure better implementation of public policies and support capacity-building and infrastructure programmes.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.