糖尿病患者眼窝血管缺失区面积测量:浅层、深层还是视网膜血管复合体?

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Microvascular research Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.mvr.2024.104743
Bruno Pereira , Ross Faria , Cátia Domingues , Ana Barros , Teresa Varandas , José Henriques , João Nascimento , Elisabete Carolino , Pedro Camacho
{"title":"糖尿病患者眼窝血管缺失区面积测量:浅层、深层还是视网膜血管复合体?","authors":"Bruno Pereira ,&nbsp;Ross Faria ,&nbsp;Cátia Domingues ,&nbsp;Ana Barros ,&nbsp;Teresa Varandas ,&nbsp;José Henriques ,&nbsp;João Nascimento ,&nbsp;Elisabete Carolino ,&nbsp;Pedro Camacho","doi":"10.1016/j.mvr.2024.104743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare differences in the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, measured in the Superficial Vascular Complex (SVC), Deep Vascular Complex (DVC) and a combined analysis of both (SDVC), using two Spectral Domain OCT angiography (OCT-A) protocols, High Speed (HS) and High Resolution (HR).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 26 eyes of diabetic patients, with and without macular oedema, were examined with two different fovea centered OCT-A volume scans. The two protocols were HS and HR volume scans, and the foveal avascular zone was manually measured in the SVC, DVC, and SDVC slabs by two masked investigators. Inter and intraoperator variability was analysed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and differences were compared between the HR and HS acquisitions throughout the different vascular slabs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Intraoperator variability was low in all slabs (ICC &gt; 0.9) and interoperator variability was lower for HR (ICC 0.835–0.911) compared to HS (ICC between 0.604 and 0.865). Comparing HS and HR measurements for the same slab, the correlation was only moderate in SVC and DVC (ICC was 0.640 and 0.568 respectively) but was good in the SDVC (ICC = 0.823). FAZ area measurement in SDVC also showed the smallest bias (mean difference 0.009 mm<sup>2</sup>) and the narrowest limits of agreement (−0.175 to 0.193 mm<sup>2</sup>).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Even in cases of diabetic macular oedema, when measuring the FAZ area, the reproducibility was better between HS and HR protocols when using the SDVC slab, compared to the SVC or DVC slabs alone. Further studies should evaluate the use of the combined SDVC slab for the FAZ assessment, compared to the SVC and DVC slabs alone, in the detection and progression of different retinal diseases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18534,"journal":{"name":"Microvascular research","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 104743"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002628622400092X/pdfft?md5=a90bc05e59dd6ae465f9a64705a72f39&pid=1-s2.0-S002628622400092X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foveal avascular zone area measurement in diabetic patients: Superficial, deep or combined retinal vascular complex?\",\"authors\":\"Bruno Pereira ,&nbsp;Ross Faria ,&nbsp;Cátia Domingues ,&nbsp;Ana Barros ,&nbsp;Teresa Varandas ,&nbsp;José Henriques ,&nbsp;João Nascimento ,&nbsp;Elisabete Carolino ,&nbsp;Pedro Camacho\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mvr.2024.104743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare differences in the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, measured in the Superficial Vascular Complex (SVC), Deep Vascular Complex (DVC) and a combined analysis of both (SDVC), using two Spectral Domain OCT angiography (OCT-A) protocols, High Speed (HS) and High Resolution (HR).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 26 eyes of diabetic patients, with and without macular oedema, were examined with two different fovea centered OCT-A volume scans. The two protocols were HS and HR volume scans, and the foveal avascular zone was manually measured in the SVC, DVC, and SDVC slabs by two masked investigators. Inter and intraoperator variability was analysed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and differences were compared between the HR and HS acquisitions throughout the different vascular slabs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Intraoperator variability was low in all slabs (ICC &gt; 0.9) and interoperator variability was lower for HR (ICC 0.835–0.911) compared to HS (ICC between 0.604 and 0.865). Comparing HS and HR measurements for the same slab, the correlation was only moderate in SVC and DVC (ICC was 0.640 and 0.568 respectively) but was good in the SDVC (ICC = 0.823). FAZ area measurement in SDVC also showed the smallest bias (mean difference 0.009 mm<sup>2</sup>) and the narrowest limits of agreement (−0.175 to 0.193 mm<sup>2</sup>).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Even in cases of diabetic macular oedema, when measuring the FAZ area, the reproducibility was better between HS and HR protocols when using the SDVC slab, compared to the SVC or DVC slabs alone. Further studies should evaluate the use of the combined SDVC slab for the FAZ assessment, compared to the SVC and DVC slabs alone, in the detection and progression of different retinal diseases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microvascular research\",\"volume\":\"157 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104743\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002628622400092X/pdfft?md5=a90bc05e59dd6ae465f9a64705a72f39&pid=1-s2.0-S002628622400092X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microvascular research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002628622400092X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microvascular research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002628622400092X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较使用高速(HS)和高分辨率(HR)两种谱域 OCT 血管造影(OCT-A)方案测量的浅层血管复合体(SVC)、深层血管复合体(DVC)以及两者的综合分析(SDVC)中眼窝无血管区(FAZ)面积的差异。方法使用两种不同的以眼窝为中心的 OCT-A 容量扫描对患有和未患有黄斑水肿的糖尿病患者的 26 只眼睛进行检查。两种方案分别为 HS 和 HR 容量扫描,由两名蒙面研究人员手动测量 SVC、DVC 和 SDVC 片上的眼窝无血管区。使用类内相关系数(ICC)分析了操作员之间和操作员内部的变异性,并比较了HR和HS在不同血管片中采集结果的差异。结果所有血管片的操作员内部变异性都很低(ICC为0.9),与HS(ICC在0.604和0.865之间)相比,HR的操作员之间变异性较低(ICC为0.835-0.911)。比较同一平板的 HS 和 HR 测量,SVC 和 DVC 的相关性仅为中等(ICC 分别为 0.640 和 0.568),但 SDVC 的相关性良好(ICC = 0.823)。结论即使是糖尿病黄斑水肿病例,在测量 FAZ 面积时,与单独使用 SVC 或 DVC 平板相比,使用 SDVC 平板在 HS 和 HR 方案之间的可重复性更好。进一步的研究应评估在不同视网膜疾病的检测和进展过程中,与单独使用 SVC 和 DVC 平板相比,使用联合 SDVC 平板进行 FAZ 评估的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Foveal avascular zone area measurement in diabetic patients: Superficial, deep or combined retinal vascular complex?

Purpose

To compare differences in the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, measured in the Superficial Vascular Complex (SVC), Deep Vascular Complex (DVC) and a combined analysis of both (SDVC), using two Spectral Domain OCT angiography (OCT-A) protocols, High Speed (HS) and High Resolution (HR).

Methods

A total of 26 eyes of diabetic patients, with and without macular oedema, were examined with two different fovea centered OCT-A volume scans. The two protocols were HS and HR volume scans, and the foveal avascular zone was manually measured in the SVC, DVC, and SDVC slabs by two masked investigators. Inter and intraoperator variability was analysed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and differences were compared between the HR and HS acquisitions throughout the different vascular slabs.

Results

Intraoperator variability was low in all slabs (ICC > 0.9) and interoperator variability was lower for HR (ICC 0.835–0.911) compared to HS (ICC between 0.604 and 0.865). Comparing HS and HR measurements for the same slab, the correlation was only moderate in SVC and DVC (ICC was 0.640 and 0.568 respectively) but was good in the SDVC (ICC = 0.823). FAZ area measurement in SDVC also showed the smallest bias (mean difference 0.009 mm2) and the narrowest limits of agreement (−0.175 to 0.193 mm2).

Conclusions

Even in cases of diabetic macular oedema, when measuring the FAZ area, the reproducibility was better between HS and HR protocols when using the SDVC slab, compared to the SVC or DVC slabs alone. Further studies should evaluate the use of the combined SDVC slab for the FAZ assessment, compared to the SVC and DVC slabs alone, in the detection and progression of different retinal diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microvascular research
Microvascular research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
158
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Microvascular Research is dedicated to the dissemination of fundamental information related to the microvascular field. Full-length articles presenting the results of original research and brief communications are featured. Research Areas include: • Angiogenesis • Biochemistry • Bioengineering • Biomathematics • Biophysics • Cancer • Circulatory homeostasis • Comparative physiology • Drug delivery • Neuropharmacology • Microvascular pathology • Rheology • Tissue Engineering.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Functional heterogeneity of endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in different order branches of mesenteric artery in female/male mice. Pulse wave analysis as a tool to assess endothelial function following lipid lowering intervention in hypercholesterolemia Retinal vascular alterations are associated with cognitive function and neuroimaging in white matter hyperintensities Cardioprotective effects of l-glutamine in an ischemic rat heart model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1