评估中国中部成熟亚热带阔叶林因森林砍伐造成物种损失的可能性

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY Trees, Forests and People Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100673
Junru Zhang, Xuechun Qu, Yimin Huang, Mengxi Tan, Kun Xu
{"title":"评估中国中部成熟亚热带阔叶林因森林砍伐造成物种损失的可能性","authors":"Junru Zhang,&nbsp;Xuechun Qu,&nbsp;Yimin Huang,&nbsp;Mengxi Tan,&nbsp;Kun Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Deforestation is a major type of land use change to accommodate growing population, especially in developing countries. The risk of diversity loss due to habitat loss can be estimated using the species-area relationship based on abundance of each species. However, deforestation often occurs before there is any understanding of the impact of deforestation on tree diversity. Here, we assessed the potential effect of forest habitat destruction on the loss of species richness in a mature subtropical broadleaf forest in central China. We surveyed and constructed the species-area relationship for 54 400 m<sup>2</sup> plots, and simulated habitat loss scenarios by randomly and aggregately sampling plots. Rank-abundance of the 21 tree species was best fitted by the Zipf-Mandelbrot model, and our sample size was sufficient by the criterion of Hill numbers at orders <em>q</em> = 0, 1, and 2. We found that the number of species lost due to habitat loss was well predicted by the random placement species loss-area loss curve, and was lower than that due to aggregated habitat destruction by less than one species. The probability of losing one species reached 40% when losing 16 plots by aggregated sampling, 10 plots fewer than that by random sampling. Moreover, the probability of losing two species was 10–22 % higher by aggregately sampling than that by randomly sampling when losing 17 – 34 plots (0.68 – 1.36 ha). Considering that aggregated deforestation is common in reality, the results imply that the number of tree species lost due to deforestation could be higher than the theoretical estimation. Our study suggests the importance of assessing the impact of deforestation on tree diversity before selective logging in subtropical forests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001808/pdfft?md5=5aadb3be7a62a3e77788411215210710&pid=1-s2.0-S2666719324001808-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the potential of species loss caused by deforestation in a mature subtropical broadleaf forest in central China\",\"authors\":\"Junru Zhang,&nbsp;Xuechun Qu,&nbsp;Yimin Huang,&nbsp;Mengxi Tan,&nbsp;Kun Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Deforestation is a major type of land use change to accommodate growing population, especially in developing countries. The risk of diversity loss due to habitat loss can be estimated using the species-area relationship based on abundance of each species. However, deforestation often occurs before there is any understanding of the impact of deforestation on tree diversity. Here, we assessed the potential effect of forest habitat destruction on the loss of species richness in a mature subtropical broadleaf forest in central China. We surveyed and constructed the species-area relationship for 54 400 m<sup>2</sup> plots, and simulated habitat loss scenarios by randomly and aggregately sampling plots. Rank-abundance of the 21 tree species was best fitted by the Zipf-Mandelbrot model, and our sample size was sufficient by the criterion of Hill numbers at orders <em>q</em> = 0, 1, and 2. We found that the number of species lost due to habitat loss was well predicted by the random placement species loss-area loss curve, and was lower than that due to aggregated habitat destruction by less than one species. The probability of losing one species reached 40% when losing 16 plots by aggregated sampling, 10 plots fewer than that by random sampling. Moreover, the probability of losing two species was 10–22 % higher by aggregately sampling than that by randomly sampling when losing 17 – 34 plots (0.68 – 1.36 ha). Considering that aggregated deforestation is common in reality, the results imply that the number of tree species lost due to deforestation could be higher than the theoretical estimation. Our study suggests the importance of assessing the impact of deforestation on tree diversity before selective logging in subtropical forests.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001808/pdfft?md5=5aadb3be7a62a3e77788411215210710&pid=1-s2.0-S2666719324001808-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

砍伐森林是为适应人口增长而改变土地用途的一种主要方式,在发展中国家尤其如此。根据每个物种的丰度,可以利用物种与面积的关系来估算栖息地丧失导致多样性丧失的风险。然而,在了解森林砍伐对树木多样性的影响之前,森林砍伐往往已经发生。在此,我们评估了森林栖息地破坏对中国中部成熟亚热带阔叶林物种丰富度损失的潜在影响。我们调查并构建了 54 个 400 m2 小块的物种-面积关系,并通过随机和集中取样模拟了栖息地丧失的情景。21种树种的等级丰度与Zipf-Mandelbrot模型的拟合效果最佳,根据q = 0、1和2阶的希尔数标准,我们的样本量足够大。我们发现,栖息地损失导致的物种损失数量可以很好地通过随机放置物种损失-面积损失曲线预测出来,而且低于栖息地遭到小于一个物种的破坏导致的物种损失数量。当聚集取样损失 16 个地块时,损失一个物种的概率达到 40%,比随机取样少 10 个地块。此外,当损失 17 - 34 个地块(0.68 - 1.36 公顷)时,集中取样损失两个物种的概率比随机取样高 10-22%。考虑到现实中普遍存在集中砍伐森林的现象,研究结果意味着因砍伐森林而损失的树种数量可能高于理论估计值。我们的研究表明,在亚热带森林进行选择性采伐之前,评估毁林对树木多样性的影响非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the potential of species loss caused by deforestation in a mature subtropical broadleaf forest in central China

Deforestation is a major type of land use change to accommodate growing population, especially in developing countries. The risk of diversity loss due to habitat loss can be estimated using the species-area relationship based on abundance of each species. However, deforestation often occurs before there is any understanding of the impact of deforestation on tree diversity. Here, we assessed the potential effect of forest habitat destruction on the loss of species richness in a mature subtropical broadleaf forest in central China. We surveyed and constructed the species-area relationship for 54 400 m2 plots, and simulated habitat loss scenarios by randomly and aggregately sampling plots. Rank-abundance of the 21 tree species was best fitted by the Zipf-Mandelbrot model, and our sample size was sufficient by the criterion of Hill numbers at orders q = 0, 1, and 2. We found that the number of species lost due to habitat loss was well predicted by the random placement species loss-area loss curve, and was lower than that due to aggregated habitat destruction by less than one species. The probability of losing one species reached 40% when losing 16 plots by aggregated sampling, 10 plots fewer than that by random sampling. Moreover, the probability of losing two species was 10–22 % higher by aggregately sampling than that by randomly sampling when losing 17 – 34 plots (0.68 – 1.36 ha). Considering that aggregated deforestation is common in reality, the results imply that the number of tree species lost due to deforestation could be higher than the theoretical estimation. Our study suggests the importance of assessing the impact of deforestation on tree diversity before selective logging in subtropical forests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
期刊最新文献
Tapping below the lateral line does not reduce maple sap yield or quality Examining woody plant diversity across indigenous agroforestry practices in the Kellem Wollega zone, Western Ethiopia The livelihood impacts of eucalypt plantations on rural farm households in Western Gurage Watersheds, Central-south Ethiopia Palynological approaches to forest restoration in Southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities for Thailand—A systematic review Timber traceability, determining effective methods to combat illegal logging in Africa: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1