基于中心的生物细胞群模型中机械力的数值整合

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1016/j.amc.2024.129069
Per Lötstedt, Sonja Mathias
{"title":"基于中心的生物细胞群模型中机械力的数值整合","authors":"Per Lötstedt,&nbsp;Sonja Mathias","doi":"10.1016/j.amc.2024.129069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Center-based models are used to simulate the mechanical behavior of biological cells during embryonic development or cancer growth. To allow for the simulation of biological populations potentially growing from a few individual cells to many thousands or more, these models have to be numerically efficient, while being reasonably accurate on the level of individual cell trajectories. In this work, we increase the robustness, accuracy, and efficiency of the simulation of center-based models by choosing the time steps adaptively in the numerical method and comparing five different integration methods. We investigate the gain in using single rate time stepping based on local estimates of the numerical errors for the forward and backward Euler methods of first order accuracy and a Runge-Kutta method and the trapezoidal method of second order accuracy. Properties of the analytical solution such as convergence to steady state and conservation of the center of gravity are inherited by the numerical solutions. Furthermore, we propose a multirate time stepping scheme that simulates regions with high local force gradients (e.g. as they happen after cell division) with multiple smaller time steps within a larger single time step for regions with smoother forces. These methods are compared for a model system in numerical experiments. We conclude, for example, that the multirate forward Euler method performs better than the Runge-Kutta method for low accuracy requirements but for higher accuracy the latter method is preferred. Only with frequent cell divisions the method with a fixed time step is the best choice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical integration of mechanical forces in center-based models for biological cell populations\",\"authors\":\"Per Lötstedt,&nbsp;Sonja Mathias\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amc.2024.129069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Center-based models are used to simulate the mechanical behavior of biological cells during embryonic development or cancer growth. To allow for the simulation of biological populations potentially growing from a few individual cells to many thousands or more, these models have to be numerically efficient, while being reasonably accurate on the level of individual cell trajectories. In this work, we increase the robustness, accuracy, and efficiency of the simulation of center-based models by choosing the time steps adaptively in the numerical method and comparing five different integration methods. We investigate the gain in using single rate time stepping based on local estimates of the numerical errors for the forward and backward Euler methods of first order accuracy and a Runge-Kutta method and the trapezoidal method of second order accuracy. Properties of the analytical solution such as convergence to steady state and conservation of the center of gravity are inherited by the numerical solutions. Furthermore, we propose a multirate time stepping scheme that simulates regions with high local force gradients (e.g. as they happen after cell division) with multiple smaller time steps within a larger single time step for regions with smoother forces. These methods are compared for a model system in numerical experiments. We conclude, for example, that the multirate forward Euler method performs better than the Runge-Kutta method for low accuracy requirements but for higher accuracy the latter method is preferred. Only with frequent cell divisions the method with a fixed time step is the best choice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300324005307\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300324005307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于中心的模型用于模拟胚胎发育或癌症生长过程中生物细胞的机械行为。为了模拟可能从几个单细胞增长到成千上万甚至更多的生物群体,这些模型必须在数值上高效,同时在单细胞轨迹的水平上合理精确。在这项工作中,我们通过在数值方法中自适应地选择时间步长,并比较五种不同的积分方法,提高了基于中心的模型模拟的鲁棒性、准确性和效率。我们根据对一阶精度的前向和后向欧拉法以及二阶精度的 Runge-Kutta 法和梯形法的数值误差的局部估计,研究了使用单速率时间步进的收益。数值解继承了分析解的特性,如收敛到稳态和重心守恒。此外,我们还提出了一种多周期时间步进方案,在局部力梯度较大的区域(如细胞分裂后发生的情况)用多个较小的时间步进进行模拟,而在力较平稳的区域则用较大的单个时间步进进行模拟。我们在数值实验中对模型系统的这些方法进行了比较。例如,我们得出结论,在精度要求较低的情况下,多周期正演欧拉法比 Runge-Kutta 法效果更好,但在精度要求较高的情况下,后者更受青睐。只有在细胞分裂频繁的情况下,固定时间步长的方法才是最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Numerical integration of mechanical forces in center-based models for biological cell populations

Center-based models are used to simulate the mechanical behavior of biological cells during embryonic development or cancer growth. To allow for the simulation of biological populations potentially growing from a few individual cells to many thousands or more, these models have to be numerically efficient, while being reasonably accurate on the level of individual cell trajectories. In this work, we increase the robustness, accuracy, and efficiency of the simulation of center-based models by choosing the time steps adaptively in the numerical method and comparing five different integration methods. We investigate the gain in using single rate time stepping based on local estimates of the numerical errors for the forward and backward Euler methods of first order accuracy and a Runge-Kutta method and the trapezoidal method of second order accuracy. Properties of the analytical solution such as convergence to steady state and conservation of the center of gravity are inherited by the numerical solutions. Furthermore, we propose a multirate time stepping scheme that simulates regions with high local force gradients (e.g. as they happen after cell division) with multiple smaller time steps within a larger single time step for regions with smoother forces. These methods are compared for a model system in numerical experiments. We conclude, for example, that the multirate forward Euler method performs better than the Runge-Kutta method for low accuracy requirements but for higher accuracy the latter method is preferred. Only with frequent cell divisions the method with a fixed time step is the best choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1