Rick Wray, Audrey Mauguen, Laure Michaud, Doris Leithner, Randy Yeh, Nadeem Riaz, Rosna Mirtcheva, Eric Sherman, Richard Wong, John Humm, Nancy Lee, Heiko Schöder
{"title":"18F-氟咪唑缺氧 PET/CT 诊断解释标准的制定以及读片机间可靠性、再现性和性能的验证","authors":"Rick Wray, Audrey Mauguen, Laure Michaud, Doris Leithner, Randy Yeh, Nadeem Riaz, Rosna Mirtcheva, Eric Sherman, Richard Wong, John Humm, Nancy Lee, Heiko Schöder","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.267775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tumor hypoxia, an integral biomarker to guide radiotherapy, can be imaged with <sup>18</sup>F-fluoromisonidazole (<sup>18</sup>F-FMISO) hypoxia PET. One major obstacle to its broader application is the lack of standardized interpretation criteria. We sought to develop and validate practical interpretation criteria and a dedicated training protocol for nuclear medicine physicians to interpret <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO hypoxia PET. <strong>Methods:</strong> We randomly selected 123 patients with human papillomavirus–positive oropharyngeal cancer enrolled in a phase II trial who underwent 123 <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and 134 <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO PET/CT scans. Four independent nuclear medicine physicians with no <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO experience read the scans. Interpretation by a fifth nuclear medicine physician with over 2 decades of <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO experience was the reference standard. Performance was evaluated after initial instruction and subsequent dedicated training. Scans were considered positive for hypoxia by visual assessment if <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO uptake was greater than floor-of-mouth uptake. Additionally, SUV<sub>max</sub> was determined to evaluate whether quantitative assessment using tumor-to-background ratios could be helpful to define hypoxia positivity. <strong>Results:</strong> Visual assessment produced a mean sensitivity and specificity of 77.3% and 80.9%, with fair interreader agreement (κ = 0.34), after initial instruction. After dedicated training, mean sensitivity and specificity improved to 97.6% and 86.9%, with almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.86). Quantitative assessment with an estimated best SUV<sub>max</sub> ratio threshold of more than 1.2 to define hypoxia positivity produced a mean sensitivity and specificity of 56.8% and 95.9%, respectively, with substantial interreader agreement (κ = 0.66), after initial instruction. After dedicated training, mean sensitivity improved to 89.6% whereas mean specificity remained high at 95.3%, with near-perfect interreader agreement (κ = 0.86). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Nuclear medicine physicians without <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO hypoxia PET reading experience demonstrate much improved interreader agreement with dedicated training using specific interpretation criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of 18F-Fluoromisonidazole Hypoxia PET/CT Diagnostic Interpretation Criteria and Validation of Interreader Reliability, Reproducibility, and Performance\",\"authors\":\"Rick Wray, Audrey Mauguen, Laure Michaud, Doris Leithner, Randy Yeh, Nadeem Riaz, Rosna Mirtcheva, Eric Sherman, Richard Wong, John Humm, Nancy Lee, Heiko Schöder\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnumed.124.267775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Tumor hypoxia, an integral biomarker to guide radiotherapy, can be imaged with <sup>18</sup>F-fluoromisonidazole (<sup>18</sup>F-FMISO) hypoxia PET. One major obstacle to its broader application is the lack of standardized interpretation criteria. We sought to develop and validate practical interpretation criteria and a dedicated training protocol for nuclear medicine physicians to interpret <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO hypoxia PET. <strong>Methods:</strong> We randomly selected 123 patients with human papillomavirus–positive oropharyngeal cancer enrolled in a phase II trial who underwent 123 <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and 134 <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO PET/CT scans. Four independent nuclear medicine physicians with no <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO experience read the scans. Interpretation by a fifth nuclear medicine physician with over 2 decades of <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO experience was the reference standard. Performance was evaluated after initial instruction and subsequent dedicated training. Scans were considered positive for hypoxia by visual assessment if <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO uptake was greater than floor-of-mouth uptake. Additionally, SUV<sub>max</sub> was determined to evaluate whether quantitative assessment using tumor-to-background ratios could be helpful to define hypoxia positivity. <strong>Results:</strong> Visual assessment produced a mean sensitivity and specificity of 77.3% and 80.9%, with fair interreader agreement (κ = 0.34), after initial instruction. After dedicated training, mean sensitivity and specificity improved to 97.6% and 86.9%, with almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.86). Quantitative assessment with an estimated best SUV<sub>max</sub> ratio threshold of more than 1.2 to define hypoxia positivity produced a mean sensitivity and specificity of 56.8% and 95.9%, respectively, with substantial interreader agreement (κ = 0.66), after initial instruction. After dedicated training, mean sensitivity improved to 89.6% whereas mean specificity remained high at 95.3%, with near-perfect interreader agreement (κ = 0.86). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Nuclear medicine physicians without <sup>18</sup>F-FMISO hypoxia PET reading experience demonstrate much improved interreader agreement with dedicated training using specific interpretation criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of 18F-Fluoromisonidazole Hypoxia PET/CT Diagnostic Interpretation Criteria and Validation of Interreader Reliability, Reproducibility, and Performance
Tumor hypoxia, an integral biomarker to guide radiotherapy, can be imaged with 18F-fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO) hypoxia PET. One major obstacle to its broader application is the lack of standardized interpretation criteria. We sought to develop and validate practical interpretation criteria and a dedicated training protocol for nuclear medicine physicians to interpret 18F-FMISO hypoxia PET. Methods: We randomly selected 123 patients with human papillomavirus–positive oropharyngeal cancer enrolled in a phase II trial who underwent 123 18F-FDG PET/CT and 134 18F-FMISO PET/CT scans. Four independent nuclear medicine physicians with no 18F-FMISO experience read the scans. Interpretation by a fifth nuclear medicine physician with over 2 decades of 18F-FMISO experience was the reference standard. Performance was evaluated after initial instruction and subsequent dedicated training. Scans were considered positive for hypoxia by visual assessment if 18F-FMISO uptake was greater than floor-of-mouth uptake. Additionally, SUVmax was determined to evaluate whether quantitative assessment using tumor-to-background ratios could be helpful to define hypoxia positivity. Results: Visual assessment produced a mean sensitivity and specificity of 77.3% and 80.9%, with fair interreader agreement (κ = 0.34), after initial instruction. After dedicated training, mean sensitivity and specificity improved to 97.6% and 86.9%, with almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.86). Quantitative assessment with an estimated best SUVmax ratio threshold of more than 1.2 to define hypoxia positivity produced a mean sensitivity and specificity of 56.8% and 95.9%, respectively, with substantial interreader agreement (κ = 0.66), after initial instruction. After dedicated training, mean sensitivity improved to 89.6% whereas mean specificity remained high at 95.3%, with near-perfect interreader agreement (κ = 0.86). Conclusion: Nuclear medicine physicians without 18F-FMISO hypoxia PET reading experience demonstrate much improved interreader agreement with dedicated training using specific interpretation criteria.