定量 SPECT/CT 指标用于早期预测胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤患者的[177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE 治疗反应

Onur Tuncer, Daniel Steinberger, Joseph Steiner, Madeleine Hinojos, Stephanie Y. Rhee, Brad Humphrey, Farhad Jafari, Zuzan Cayci
{"title":"定量 SPECT/CT 指标用于早期预测胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤患者的[177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE 治疗反应","authors":"Onur Tuncer, Daniel Steinberger, Joseph Steiner, Madeleine Hinojos, Stephanie Y. Rhee, Brad Humphrey, Farhad Jafari, Zuzan Cayci","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.267964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Our objective is to explore quantitative imaging markers for early prediction of treatment response in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) undergoing [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapy. By doing so, we aim to enable timely switching to more effective therapies in order to prevent time-resource waste and minimize toxicities. <strong>Methods:</strong> Patients diagnosed with unresectable or metastatic, progressive, well-differentiated, receptor-positive GEP-NETs who received 4 sessions of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTATATE were retrospectively selected. Using SPECT/CT images taken at the end of treatment sessions, we counted all visible tumors and measured their largest diameters to calculate the tumor burden score (TBS). Up to 4 target lesions were selected and semiautomatically segmented. Target lesion peak counts and spleen peak counts were measured, and normalized peak counts were calculated. Changes in TBS (ΔTBS) and changes in normalized peak count (ΔnPC) throughout treatment sessions in relation to the first treatment session were calculated. Treatment responses were evaluated using third-month CT and were binarized as progressive disease (PD) or non-PD. <strong>Results:</strong> Twenty-seven patients were included (7 PD, 20 non-PD). Significant differences were observed in ΔTBS<sub>second-first</sub>, ΔTBS<sub>third-first</sub>, and ΔTBS<sub>fourth-first</sub> (where second-first, third-first, and fourth-first denote scan number between the second and first, third and first, and fourth and first [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTATATE treatment cycles), respectively) between the PD and non-PD groups (median, 0.043 vs. −0.049, 0.08 vs. −0.116, and 0.109 vs. −0.123 [<em>P</em> = 0.023, <em>P</em> = 0.002, and <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001], respectively). ΔnPC<sub>second-first</sub> showed significant group differences (mean, −0.107 vs. −0.282; <em>P</em> = 0.033); ΔnPC<sub>third-first</sub> and ΔnPC<sub>fourth-first</sub> did not reach statistical significance (mean, −0.122 vs. −0.312 and −0.183 vs. −0.405 [<em>P</em> = 0.117 and 0.067], respectively). At the optimal threshold, ΔTBS<sub>fourth-first</sub> exhibited an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.957, achieving 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity. ΔTBS<sub>second-first</sub> and ΔTBS<sub>third-first</sub> reached AUCs of 0.793 and 0.893, sensitivities of 71.4%, and specificities of 85% and 95%, respectively. ΔnPC<sub>second-first</sub>, ΔnPC<sub>third-first</sub>, and ΔnPC<sub>fourth-first</sub> showed AUCs of 0.764, 0.693, and 0.679; sensitivities of 71.4%, 71.4%, and 100%; and specificities of 75%, 70%, and 35%, respectively. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> ΔTBS and ΔnPC can predict [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTATATE response by the second treatment session.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative SPECT/CT Metrics in Early Prediction of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE Treatment Response in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients\",\"authors\":\"Onur Tuncer, Daniel Steinberger, Joseph Steiner, Madeleine Hinojos, Stephanie Y. Rhee, Brad Humphrey, Farhad Jafari, Zuzan Cayci\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnumed.124.267964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Our objective is to explore quantitative imaging markers for early prediction of treatment response in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) undergoing [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapy. By doing so, we aim to enable timely switching to more effective therapies in order to prevent time-resource waste and minimize toxicities. <strong>Methods:</strong> Patients diagnosed with unresectable or metastatic, progressive, well-differentiated, receptor-positive GEP-NETs who received 4 sessions of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTATATE were retrospectively selected. Using SPECT/CT images taken at the end of treatment sessions, we counted all visible tumors and measured their largest diameters to calculate the tumor burden score (TBS). Up to 4 target lesions were selected and semiautomatically segmented. Target lesion peak counts and spleen peak counts were measured, and normalized peak counts were calculated. Changes in TBS (ΔTBS) and changes in normalized peak count (ΔnPC) throughout treatment sessions in relation to the first treatment session were calculated. Treatment responses were evaluated using third-month CT and were binarized as progressive disease (PD) or non-PD. <strong>Results:</strong> Twenty-seven patients were included (7 PD, 20 non-PD). Significant differences were observed in ΔTBS<sub>second-first</sub>, ΔTBS<sub>third-first</sub>, and ΔTBS<sub>fourth-first</sub> (where second-first, third-first, and fourth-first denote scan number between the second and first, third and first, and fourth and first [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTATATE treatment cycles), respectively) between the PD and non-PD groups (median, 0.043 vs. −0.049, 0.08 vs. −0.116, and 0.109 vs. −0.123 [<em>P</em> = 0.023, <em>P</em> = 0.002, and <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001], respectively). ΔnPC<sub>second-first</sub> showed significant group differences (mean, −0.107 vs. −0.282; <em>P</em> = 0.033); ΔnPC<sub>third-first</sub> and ΔnPC<sub>fourth-first</sub> did not reach statistical significance (mean, −0.122 vs. −0.312 and −0.183 vs. −0.405 [<em>P</em> = 0.117 and 0.067], respectively). At the optimal threshold, ΔTBS<sub>fourth-first</sub> exhibited an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.957, achieving 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity. ΔTBS<sub>second-first</sub> and ΔTBS<sub>third-first</sub> reached AUCs of 0.793 and 0.893, sensitivities of 71.4%, and specificities of 85% and 95%, respectively. ΔnPC<sub>second-first</sub>, ΔnPC<sub>third-first</sub>, and ΔnPC<sub>fourth-first</sub> showed AUCs of 0.764, 0.693, and 0.679; sensitivities of 71.4%, 71.4%, and 100%; and specificities of 75%, 70%, and 35%, respectively. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> ΔTBS and ΔnPC can predict [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTATATE response by the second treatment session.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267964\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目标是探索用于早期预测接受[177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE疗法的胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤(GEP-NET)患者治疗反应的定量成像标记物。这样做的目的是使患者能够及时转用更有效的疗法,以避免时间资源浪费并将毒性降至最低。治疗方法回顾性筛选出接受过4次[177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE治疗的不可切除性或转移性、进展性、分化良好、受体阳性GEP-NET患者。利用治疗疗程结束时拍摄的SPECT/CT图像,我们对所有可见肿瘤进行了计数,并测量了它们的最大直径,以计算肿瘤负荷评分(TBS)。最多选择 4 个靶病灶,并进行半自动分割。测量靶病灶峰值计数和脾脏峰值计数,并计算归一化峰值计数。计算与第一次治疗相比,整个治疗过程中 TBS 的变化(ΔTBS)和归一化峰值计数的变化(ΔnPC)。使用第三个月的 CT 评估治疗反应,并将其二元化为疾病进展(PD)或非 PD。结果:共纳入 27 例患者(7 例进展期,20 例非进展期)。在ΔTBSsecond-first、ΔTBSthird-first和ΔTBSfourth-first(其中,second-first、third-first和fourth-first分别表示第二个和第一个、第三个和第一个以及第四个和第一个[177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE治疗周期之间的扫描次数)方面,PD组和非PD组之间存在显著差异(中位数分别为0.043 vs. -0.049、0.08 vs. -0.116和0.08 vs. -0.116)。分别为 0.043 vs. -0.049、0.08 vs. -0.116、0.109 vs. -0.123[P=0.023、P=0.002 和 P <0.001])。ΔnPCsecond-first显示出显著的组间差异(平均值为-0.107 vs. -0.282;P = 0.033);ΔnPCthird-first和ΔnPCfourth-first未达到统计学意义(平均值分别为-0.122 vs. -0.312和-0.183 vs. -0.405[P = 0.117和0.067])。在最佳阈值下,ΔTBSfourth-first 的曲线下面积 (AUC) 为 0.957,灵敏度为 100%,特异性为 80%。ΔTBSsecond-first 和 ΔTBSthird-first 的 AUC 分别为 0.793 和 0.893,灵敏度为 71.4%,特异度分别为 85% 和 95%。ΔnPCsecond-first、ΔnPCthird-first 和 ΔnPCfourth-first的AUC分别为0.764、0.693和0.679;灵敏度分别为71.4%、71.4%和100%;特异性分别为75%、70%和35%。结论:ΔTBS 和 ΔnPC可预测第二次治疗时的[177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantitative SPECT/CT Metrics in Early Prediction of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE Treatment Response in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients

Our objective is to explore quantitative imaging markers for early prediction of treatment response in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) undergoing [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapy. By doing so, we aim to enable timely switching to more effective therapies in order to prevent time-resource waste and minimize toxicities. Methods: Patients diagnosed with unresectable or metastatic, progressive, well-differentiated, receptor-positive GEP-NETs who received 4 sessions of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE were retrospectively selected. Using SPECT/CT images taken at the end of treatment sessions, we counted all visible tumors and measured their largest diameters to calculate the tumor burden score (TBS). Up to 4 target lesions were selected and semiautomatically segmented. Target lesion peak counts and spleen peak counts were measured, and normalized peak counts were calculated. Changes in TBS (ΔTBS) and changes in normalized peak count (ΔnPC) throughout treatment sessions in relation to the first treatment session were calculated. Treatment responses were evaluated using third-month CT and were binarized as progressive disease (PD) or non-PD. Results: Twenty-seven patients were included (7 PD, 20 non-PD). Significant differences were observed in ΔTBSsecond-first, ΔTBSthird-first, and ΔTBSfourth-first (where second-first, third-first, and fourth-first denote scan number between the second and first, third and first, and fourth and first [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE treatment cycles), respectively) between the PD and non-PD groups (median, 0.043 vs. −0.049, 0.08 vs. −0.116, and 0.109 vs. −0.123 [P = 0.023, P = 0.002, and P < 0.001], respectively). ΔnPCsecond-first showed significant group differences (mean, −0.107 vs. −0.282; P = 0.033); ΔnPCthird-first and ΔnPCfourth-first did not reach statistical significance (mean, −0.122 vs. −0.312 and −0.183 vs. −0.405 [P = 0.117 and 0.067], respectively). At the optimal threshold, ΔTBSfourth-first exhibited an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.957, achieving 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity. ΔTBSsecond-first and ΔTBSthird-first reached AUCs of 0.793 and 0.893, sensitivities of 71.4%, and specificities of 85% and 95%, respectively. ΔnPCsecond-first, ΔnPCthird-first, and ΔnPCfourth-first showed AUCs of 0.764, 0.693, and 0.679; sensitivities of 71.4%, 71.4%, and 100%; and specificities of 75%, 70%, and 35%, respectively. Conclusion: ΔTBS and ΔnPC can predict [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE response by the second treatment session.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Precautions to Consider in the Analysis of Prognostic and Predictive Indices Head-to-Head Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-RM26 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Prospective Study [18F]F-AraG Uptake in Vertebral Bone Marrow May Predict Survival in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Anti-PD-(L)1 Immunotherapy Intraarterial Administration of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Advanced Meningioma: Initial Safety and Efficacy MIRD Pamphlet No. 31: MIRDcell V4—Artificial Intelligence Tools to Formulate Optimized Radiopharmaceutical Cocktails for Therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1