残奥会举重运动员在固定和可变阻力下的速度、力量和皮肤温度分析

IF 2.2 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.3390/sports12090250
Gildo Francisco dos Santos Filho, Felipe J. Aidar, Márcio Getirana-Mota, Ciro José Brito, Esteban Aedo-Muñoz, Ângelo de Almeida Paz, Joilson Alves de Souza Leite Júnior, Edson Lucas Monteiro Vieira, Pantelis T. Nikolaidis
{"title":"残奥会举重运动员在固定和可变阻力下的速度、力量和皮肤温度分析","authors":"Gildo Francisco dos Santos Filho, Felipe J. Aidar, Márcio Getirana-Mota, Ciro José Brito, Esteban Aedo-Muñoz, Ângelo de Almeida Paz, Joilson Alves de Souza Leite Júnior, Edson Lucas Monteiro Vieira, Pantelis T. Nikolaidis","doi":"10.3390/sports12090250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Variable resistance training has been widely used in athletic preparation. Objectives: To analyze the use of currents (VRT) and the traditional method (TRAD) on speed, power and temperature in a training session. Methods: Fourteen paralympic powerlifting (PP) athletes took part over three weeks. In week 1, familiarization and 1RM tests took place, and, in weeks 2 and 3, pre- and post-training took place, where the propulsive mean velocity and power and temperatures were assessed before and after, at 24 h and 48 h. Results: There was a difference in the sternal pectoral temperatures before and after VRT (p = 0.040) and at 48 h for TRAD and VRT (p = 0.018); in the clavicular pectoralis before and after VRT and TRAD (p = 0.003); in the anterior deltoid after and at 48 h for TRAD and VRT (p = 0.026 and p = 0.017); and in the triceps after and at 24 h and 48 h between TRAD and VRT (p = 0.005). In the training series, the MPV was significant in TRAD between Set1 and Set5 (p = 0.003), in training (VRT) between Set1 and Set5 (p = 0.001) and in Set5 between the methods (p = 0.047). For power, there was a difference between Set1 and 5 in TRAD (p = 0.016) and VRT (p = 0.002). Conclusion: We conclude that training with currents (VRT) promoted greater muscle fatigue when compared to traditional training.","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Velocity, Power and Skin Temperature in Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes with Fixed and Variable Resistance\",\"authors\":\"Gildo Francisco dos Santos Filho, Felipe J. Aidar, Márcio Getirana-Mota, Ciro José Brito, Esteban Aedo-Muñoz, Ângelo de Almeida Paz, Joilson Alves de Souza Leite Júnior, Edson Lucas Monteiro Vieira, Pantelis T. Nikolaidis\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/sports12090250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Variable resistance training has been widely used in athletic preparation. Objectives: To analyze the use of currents (VRT) and the traditional method (TRAD) on speed, power and temperature in a training session. Methods: Fourteen paralympic powerlifting (PP) athletes took part over three weeks. In week 1, familiarization and 1RM tests took place, and, in weeks 2 and 3, pre- and post-training took place, where the propulsive mean velocity and power and temperatures were assessed before and after, at 24 h and 48 h. Results: There was a difference in the sternal pectoral temperatures before and after VRT (p = 0.040) and at 48 h for TRAD and VRT (p = 0.018); in the clavicular pectoralis before and after VRT and TRAD (p = 0.003); in the anterior deltoid after and at 48 h for TRAD and VRT (p = 0.026 and p = 0.017); and in the triceps after and at 24 h and 48 h between TRAD and VRT (p = 0.005). In the training series, the MPV was significant in TRAD between Set1 and Set5 (p = 0.003), in training (VRT) between Set1 and Set5 (p = 0.001) and in Set5 between the methods (p = 0.047). For power, there was a difference between Set1 and 5 in TRAD (p = 0.016) and VRT (p = 0.002). Conclusion: We conclude that training with currents (VRT) promoted greater muscle fatigue when compared to traditional training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12090250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12090250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

变阻力训练已被广泛用于运动准备。目的分析在训练中使用电流(VRT)和传统方法(TRAD)对速度、力量和体温的影响。方法:14 名残奥会举重运动员14 名残奥会举重运动员参加了为期三周的训练。第 1 周进行了熟悉和 1RM 测试,第 2 周和第 3 周进行了训练前和训练后测试,分别在训练前后 24 小时和 48 小时评估了推进平均速度、力量和体温:在 VRT 前后(P = 0.040)以及 TRAD 和 VRT 48 h 时(P = 0.018),胸骨胸肌温度存在差异;在 VRT 和 TRAD 前后,锁骨胸肌温度存在差异(P = 0.003);TRAD 和 VRT 训练后和训练 48 小时后三角肌前部(p = 0.026 和 p = 0.017);TRAD 和 VRT 训练后和训练 24 小时和训练 48 小时后肱三头肌(p = 0.005)。在训练系列中,在 TRAD 中,Set1 和 Set5 之间的 MPV 有显著差异(p = 0.003);在训练(VRT)中,Set1 和 Set5 之间的 MPV 有显著差异(p = 0.001);在 Set5 中,各种方法之间的 MPV 有显著差异(p = 0.047)。就功率而言,Set1 和 Set5 在 TRAD(p = 0.016)和 VRT(p = 0.002)方面存在差异。结论我们得出的结论是,与传统训练相比,使用电流训练(VRT)更能促进肌肉疲劳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Velocity, Power and Skin Temperature in Paralympic Powerlifting Athletes with Fixed and Variable Resistance
Variable resistance training has been widely used in athletic preparation. Objectives: To analyze the use of currents (VRT) and the traditional method (TRAD) on speed, power and temperature in a training session. Methods: Fourteen paralympic powerlifting (PP) athletes took part over three weeks. In week 1, familiarization and 1RM tests took place, and, in weeks 2 and 3, pre- and post-training took place, where the propulsive mean velocity and power and temperatures were assessed before and after, at 24 h and 48 h. Results: There was a difference in the sternal pectoral temperatures before and after VRT (p = 0.040) and at 48 h for TRAD and VRT (p = 0.018); in the clavicular pectoralis before and after VRT and TRAD (p = 0.003); in the anterior deltoid after and at 48 h for TRAD and VRT (p = 0.026 and p = 0.017); and in the triceps after and at 24 h and 48 h between TRAD and VRT (p = 0.005). In the training series, the MPV was significant in TRAD between Set1 and Set5 (p = 0.003), in training (VRT) between Set1 and Set5 (p = 0.001) and in Set5 between the methods (p = 0.047). For power, there was a difference between Set1 and 5 in TRAD (p = 0.016) and VRT (p = 0.002). Conclusion: We conclude that training with currents (VRT) promoted greater muscle fatigue when compared to traditional training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anthropometric Profile and Position-Specific Changes in Segmental Body Composition of Professional Football Players Throughout a Training Period. Effects of Maturation on Plantar Flexor Activity and Achilles Tendon Stiffness in Vertical Jumping: Sex Differences. Oxygenation Kinetics of Three Quadriceps Muscles During Squatting Exercise in Trained Men. Rebuilding Stability: Exploring the Best Rehabilitation Methods for Chronic Ankle Instability. Analysing the Relation between Passion, Motivation, and Subjective Well-Being in Sport: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1