分层双边和单边数据的共同几率检验和区间估计

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Statistical Methods in Medical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1177/09622802241267357
Shuangcheng Hua, Changxing Ma
{"title":"分层双边和单边数据的共同几率检验和区间估计","authors":"Shuangcheng Hua, Changxing Ma","doi":"10.1177/09622802241267357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In clinical research, data are commonly collected bilaterally from paired organs or bodily parts within individual subjects. However, unilateral data arise when constraints or limiting factors impede the collection of complete bilateral data. In this article, we propose three large-sample tests and five confidence interval methods for making inferences on the common treatment effect, measured by the odds ratio, in a stratified design under integrated bilateral and unilateral data. Our simulation results show that the likelihood ratio-based and score-based tests, along with their associated confidence interval methods, demonstrate robust control of type I error and close-to-nominal coverage probabilities. We apply the proposed methods to real-world datasets of acute otitis media and myopic eyes to showcase their validity and applicability in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":22038,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","volume":"81 1","pages":"9622802241267357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Common odds ratio test and interval estimation for stratified bilateral and unilateral data\",\"authors\":\"Shuangcheng Hua, Changxing Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09622802241267357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In clinical research, data are commonly collected bilaterally from paired organs or bodily parts within individual subjects. However, unilateral data arise when constraints or limiting factors impede the collection of complete bilateral data. In this article, we propose three large-sample tests and five confidence interval methods for making inferences on the common treatment effect, measured by the odds ratio, in a stratified design under integrated bilateral and unilateral data. Our simulation results show that the likelihood ratio-based and score-based tests, along with their associated confidence interval methods, demonstrate robust control of type I error and close-to-nominal coverage probabilities. We apply the proposed methods to real-world datasets of acute otitis media and myopic eyes to showcase their validity and applicability in clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Methods in Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"9622802241267357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Methods in Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802241267357\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802241267357","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在临床研究中,通常会从受试者体内成对的器官或身体部位收集双侧数据。然而,当一些限制因素阻碍了完整的双侧数据的收集时,就会出现单侧数据。在本文中,我们提出了三种大样本检验和五种置信区间方法,用于在整合双边和单边数据的分层设计中推断以几率比衡量的共同治疗效果。我们的模拟结果表明,基于似然比的检验和基于得分的检验以及与之相关的置信区间方法都能稳健地控制 I 型误差和接近名义的覆盖概率。我们将所提出的方法应用于急性中耳炎和近视眼的实际数据集,以展示这些方法在临床实践中的有效性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Common odds ratio test and interval estimation for stratified bilateral and unilateral data
In clinical research, data are commonly collected bilaterally from paired organs or bodily parts within individual subjects. However, unilateral data arise when constraints or limiting factors impede the collection of complete bilateral data. In this article, we propose three large-sample tests and five confidence interval methods for making inferences on the common treatment effect, measured by the odds ratio, in a stratified design under integrated bilateral and unilateral data. Our simulation results show that the likelihood ratio-based and score-based tests, along with their associated confidence interval methods, demonstrate robust control of type I error and close-to-nominal coverage probabilities. We apply the proposed methods to real-world datasets of acute otitis media and myopic eyes to showcase their validity and applicability in clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Statistical Methods in Medical Research 医学-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
127
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical Methods in Medical Research is a peer reviewed scholarly journal and is the leading vehicle for articles in all the main areas of medical statistics and an essential reference for all medical statisticians. This unique journal is devoted solely to statistics and medicine and aims to keep professionals abreast of the many powerful statistical techniques now available to the medical profession. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
An optimal exact confidence interval for the difference of two independent binomial proportions. Covariate-adjusted response-adaptive designs for semiparametric survival models. Model-based optimal randomization procedure for treatment-covariate interaction tests. LASSO-type instrumental variable selection methods with an application to Mendelian randomization. Estimating an adjusted risk difference in a cluster randomized trial with individual-level analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1