全静脉麻醉期间 CONOX 监测器的 qNOX、qCON、爆发抑制比和肌肉活动指数之间的关系:一项试验研究

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1007/s10877-024-01214-6
Federico Linassi, Sergio Vide, Ana Ferreira, Gerhard Schneider, Pedro Gambús, Matthias Kreuzer
{"title":"全静脉麻醉期间 CONOX 监测器的 qNOX、qCON、爆发抑制比和肌肉活动指数之间的关系:一项试验研究","authors":"Federico Linassi, Sergio Vide, Ana Ferreira, Gerhard Schneider, Pedro Gambús, Matthias Kreuzer","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01214-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Background: Processed electroencephalographic (EEG) indices can help to navigate general anesthesia. The CONOX (Fresenius Kabi) calculates two indices, the qCON (hypnotic level) and the qNOX (nociception). The CONOX also calculates indices for electromyographic (EMG) activity and EEG burst suppression (BSR). Because all EEG parameters seem to influence each other, our goal was a detailed description of parameter relationships. Methods: We used qCON, qNOX, EMG, and BSR information from 14 patients receiving propofol anesthesia. We described index relationships with linear models, heat maps, and box plot representations. We also evaluated associations between qCON/qNOX and propofol/remifentanil effect site concentrations (ceP/ceR). Results: qNOX and qCON (<i>qCON = 0.79*qNOX + 5.</i>8; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.84) had a strong linear association. We further confirmed the strong relationship between qCON/qNOX and BSR for qCON/qNOX &lt; 25: <i>qCON=-0.19*BSR + 25.6</i> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72); <i>qNOX=-0.20*BSR + 26.2</i> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72). The relationship between qCON and EMG was strong at higher indices: <i>qCON = 0.55*EMG + 33.0</i> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.68). There was no qCON &gt; 80 without EMG &gt; 0. The relationship between ceP and qCON was <i>qCON=-3.8*ceP + 70.6</i> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.11). The heat maps also suggest that the qCON and qNOX can at least partially separate the hypnotic and analgetic components of anesthesia. Conclusion: We could describe relationships between qCON, qNOX, EMG, BSR, ceP, and ceR, which may help the anaesthesiologist better interpret the information provided. One major finding is the dependence of qCON &gt; 80 on EMG activity. This may limit the possibility of detecting wakefulness in the absence of EMG. Further, qNOX seems generally higher than qCON, but high opioid doses may lead to higher qCON than qNOX indices.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":"2018 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships between the qNOX, qCON, burst suppression ratio, and muscle activity index of the CONOX monitor during total intravenous anesthesia: a pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Federico Linassi, Sergio Vide, Ana Ferreira, Gerhard Schneider, Pedro Gambús, Matthias Kreuzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10877-024-01214-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Background: Processed electroencephalographic (EEG) indices can help to navigate general anesthesia. The CONOX (Fresenius Kabi) calculates two indices, the qCON (hypnotic level) and the qNOX (nociception). The CONOX also calculates indices for electromyographic (EMG) activity and EEG burst suppression (BSR). Because all EEG parameters seem to influence each other, our goal was a detailed description of parameter relationships. Methods: We used qCON, qNOX, EMG, and BSR information from 14 patients receiving propofol anesthesia. We described index relationships with linear models, heat maps, and box plot representations. We also evaluated associations between qCON/qNOX and propofol/remifentanil effect site concentrations (ceP/ceR). Results: qNOX and qCON (<i>qCON = 0.79*qNOX + 5.</i>8; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.84) had a strong linear association. We further confirmed the strong relationship between qCON/qNOX and BSR for qCON/qNOX &lt; 25: <i>qCON=-0.19*BSR + 25.6</i> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72); <i>qNOX=-0.20*BSR + 26.2</i> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72). The relationship between qCON and EMG was strong at higher indices: <i>qCON = 0.55*EMG + 33.0</i> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.68). There was no qCON &gt; 80 without EMG &gt; 0. The relationship between ceP and qCON was <i>qCON=-3.8*ceP + 70.6</i> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.11). The heat maps also suggest that the qCON and qNOX can at least partially separate the hypnotic and analgetic components of anesthesia. Conclusion: We could describe relationships between qCON, qNOX, EMG, BSR, ceP, and ceR, which may help the anaesthesiologist better interpret the information provided. One major finding is the dependence of qCON &gt; 80 on EMG activity. This may limit the possibility of detecting wakefulness in the absence of EMG. Further, qNOX seems generally higher than qCON, but high opioid doses may lead to higher qCON than qNOX indices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"volume\":\"2018 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01214-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01214-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经过处理的脑电图(EEG)指数有助于指导全身麻醉。CONOX(费森尤斯卡比公司)可计算两个指数:qCON(催眠水平)和qNOX(痛觉)。CONOX还能计算肌电图(EMG)活动指数和脑电图猝发抑制(BSR)指数。由于所有脑电图参数似乎都会相互影响,因此我们的目标是详细描述参数之间的关系。方法:我们使用了 14 名接受异丙酚麻醉的患者的 qCON、qNOX、EMG 和 BSR 信息。我们用线性模型、热图和箱形图来描述指标关系。我们还评估了 qCON/qNOX 与异丙酚/瑞芬太尼效应部位浓度(ceP/ceR)之间的关联。结果:qNOX 和 qCON(qCON = 0.79*qNOX + 5.8; p < 0.001; R2 = 0.84)之间有很强的线性关系。在 qCON/qNOX < 25 时,我们进一步证实了 qCON/qNOX 与 BSR 之间的密切关系:qCON=-0.19*BSR + 25.6 (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.72);qNOX=-0.20*BSR + 26.2 (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.72)。在指数较高时,qCON 与肌电图之间的关系很强:qCON = 0.55*EMG + 33.0 (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.68)。没有 qCON > 80,EMG > 0。ceP与qCON之间的关系为qCON=-3.8*ceP + 70.6(p < 0.001; R2 = 0.11)。热图还表明,qCON 和 qNOX 至少可以部分区分麻醉的催眠和镇痛成分。结论:我们可以描述 qCON、qNOX、EMG、BSR、ceP 和 ceR 之间的关系,这可以帮助麻醉医师更好地解读所提供的信息。一个主要发现是 qCON > 80 与肌电图活动的关系。这可能会限制在没有肌电图的情况下检测清醒状态的可能性。此外,qNOX 似乎普遍高于 qCON,但高阿片剂量可能导致 qCON 指数高于 qNOX 指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationships between the qNOX, qCON, burst suppression ratio, and muscle activity index of the CONOX monitor during total intravenous anesthesia: a pilot study

Background: Processed electroencephalographic (EEG) indices can help to navigate general anesthesia. The CONOX (Fresenius Kabi) calculates two indices, the qCON (hypnotic level) and the qNOX (nociception). The CONOX also calculates indices for electromyographic (EMG) activity and EEG burst suppression (BSR). Because all EEG parameters seem to influence each other, our goal was a detailed description of parameter relationships. Methods: We used qCON, qNOX, EMG, and BSR information from 14 patients receiving propofol anesthesia. We described index relationships with linear models, heat maps, and box plot representations. We also evaluated associations between qCON/qNOX and propofol/remifentanil effect site concentrations (ceP/ceR). Results: qNOX and qCON (qCON = 0.79*qNOX + 5.8; p < 0.001; R2 = 0.84) had a strong linear association. We further confirmed the strong relationship between qCON/qNOX and BSR for qCON/qNOX < 25: qCON=-0.19*BSR + 25.6 (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.72); qNOX=-0.20*BSR + 26.2 (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.72). The relationship between qCON and EMG was strong at higher indices: qCON = 0.55*EMG + 33.0 (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.68). There was no qCON > 80 without EMG > 0. The relationship between ceP and qCON was qCON=-3.8*ceP + 70.6 (p < 0.001; R2 = 0.11). The heat maps also suggest that the qCON and qNOX can at least partially separate the hypnotic and analgetic components of anesthesia. Conclusion: We could describe relationships between qCON, qNOX, EMG, BSR, ceP, and ceR, which may help the anaesthesiologist better interpret the information provided. One major finding is the dependence of qCON > 80 on EMG activity. This may limit the possibility of detecting wakefulness in the absence of EMG. Further, qNOX seems generally higher than qCON, but high opioid doses may lead to higher qCON than qNOX indices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness of data driven personalised antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock. Assessing fluid responsiveness by using functional hemodynamic tests in critically ill patients: a narrative review and a profile-based clinical guide. The use of the surgical pleth index to guide anaesthesia in gastroenterological surgery: a randomised controlled study. Decision support guided fluid challenges and stroke volume response during high-risk surgery: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Automated and reference methods for the calculation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral or ejection fraction by non-cardiologists: a systematic review on the agreement of the two methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1