Martin L. Battaglia, Sirwan Babaei, Amir Sadeghpour, Wade E. Thomason, Subhan Danish, Mahmoud Seleiman, Ekrem Ozlu, Maythem AL-Amery, John H. Fike, Andre A. Diatta
{"title":"清除作物残茬对美国大西洋中部地区作物产量、原料质量和理论乙醇产量的影响","authors":"Martin L. Battaglia, Sirwan Babaei, Amir Sadeghpour, Wade E. Thomason, Subhan Danish, Mahmoud Seleiman, Ekrem Ozlu, Maythem AL-Amery, John H. Fike, Andre A. Diatta","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cellulosic biomass-to-bioenergy systems provide fuel, reduce emissions, and offer economic benefits. Corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) and wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) residues could be used as feedstocks for biofuel production. However, the impact of residue removal on crop productivity in the Mid-Atlantic region has not been thoroughly assessed. A trial was conducted to assess crop yield and quality response to different biomass retention rates in grain cropping systems during 2015–2017. Various combinations of corn stover (0–10 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and wheat straw (0–3 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) were applied in a corn–wheat/soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] rotation in New Kent, VA. In Blacksburg, VA, corn stover (0–20 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) was applied in the continuous corn system. Residues were applied after grain harvest over two production cycles for each system. Residue retention showed no significant impact on grain or crop residue yields or nutrient uptake in either system. Treatment minimally impacted feedstock quality, except wheat straw's sulfur (S) concentration, optimized at around 70% retention in New Kent. Theoretical ethanol potential (TEP) and yield remained unaffected by total residue rates in New Kent. In Blacksburg, over 2 years, a minimum TEP for corn stover corresponded to a retention rate of approximately 30%. A retention rate of more than 30% increased TEP, likely due to improved feedstock quality. Nutrient replacement costs for primary macronutrients and S uptake ranged from $18.3 to $36.9 ha<sup>−1</sup> for corn stover and $6.1 to $11.8 ha<sup>−1</sup> for wheat straw. Residue harvest or addition did not harm short-term biomass yield in Virginia's grain-based cropping systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 6","pages":"3033-3052"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of crop residue removal on crop production, feedstock quality, and theoretical ethanol production in the Mid-Atlantic United States\",\"authors\":\"Martin L. Battaglia, Sirwan Babaei, Amir Sadeghpour, Wade E. Thomason, Subhan Danish, Mahmoud Seleiman, Ekrem Ozlu, Maythem AL-Amery, John H. Fike, Andre A. Diatta\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.21659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cellulosic biomass-to-bioenergy systems provide fuel, reduce emissions, and offer economic benefits. Corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) and wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) residues could be used as feedstocks for biofuel production. However, the impact of residue removal on crop productivity in the Mid-Atlantic region has not been thoroughly assessed. A trial was conducted to assess crop yield and quality response to different biomass retention rates in grain cropping systems during 2015–2017. Various combinations of corn stover (0–10 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and wheat straw (0–3 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) were applied in a corn–wheat/soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] rotation in New Kent, VA. In Blacksburg, VA, corn stover (0–20 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) was applied in the continuous corn system. Residues were applied after grain harvest over two production cycles for each system. Residue retention showed no significant impact on grain or crop residue yields or nutrient uptake in either system. Treatment minimally impacted feedstock quality, except wheat straw's sulfur (S) concentration, optimized at around 70% retention in New Kent. Theoretical ethanol potential (TEP) and yield remained unaffected by total residue rates in New Kent. In Blacksburg, over 2 years, a minimum TEP for corn stover corresponded to a retention rate of approximately 30%. A retention rate of more than 30% increased TEP, likely due to improved feedstock quality. Nutrient replacement costs for primary macronutrients and S uptake ranged from $18.3 to $36.9 ha<sup>−1</sup> for corn stover and $6.1 to $11.8 ha<sup>−1</sup> for wheat straw. Residue harvest or addition did not harm short-term biomass yield in Virginia's grain-based cropping systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"116 6\",\"pages\":\"3033-3052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21659\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21659","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of crop residue removal on crop production, feedstock quality, and theoretical ethanol production in the Mid-Atlantic United States
Cellulosic biomass-to-bioenergy systems provide fuel, reduce emissions, and offer economic benefits. Corn (Zea mays L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) residues could be used as feedstocks for biofuel production. However, the impact of residue removal on crop productivity in the Mid-Atlantic region has not been thoroughly assessed. A trial was conducted to assess crop yield and quality response to different biomass retention rates in grain cropping systems during 2015–2017. Various combinations of corn stover (0–10 Mg ha−1) and wheat straw (0–3 Mg ha−1) were applied in a corn–wheat/soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation in New Kent, VA. In Blacksburg, VA, corn stover (0–20 Mg ha−1) was applied in the continuous corn system. Residues were applied after grain harvest over two production cycles for each system. Residue retention showed no significant impact on grain or crop residue yields or nutrient uptake in either system. Treatment minimally impacted feedstock quality, except wheat straw's sulfur (S) concentration, optimized at around 70% retention in New Kent. Theoretical ethanol potential (TEP) and yield remained unaffected by total residue rates in New Kent. In Blacksburg, over 2 years, a minimum TEP for corn stover corresponded to a retention rate of approximately 30%. A retention rate of more than 30% increased TEP, likely due to improved feedstock quality. Nutrient replacement costs for primary macronutrients and S uptake ranged from $18.3 to $36.9 ha−1 for corn stover and $6.1 to $11.8 ha−1 for wheat straw. Residue harvest or addition did not harm short-term biomass yield in Virginia's grain-based cropping systems.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.