Ukamaka V. Nnyaba, Hewan M. Shemtaga, David W. Collins, Amanda L. Muyskens, Benjamin W. Priest, Nedret Billor
{"title":"增强心电图数据分类的可信度:鲁棒高斯过程方法 (MuyGPs)","authors":"Ukamaka V. Nnyaba, Hewan M. Shemtaga, David W. Collins, Amanda L. Muyskens, Benjamin W. Priest, Nedret Billor","doi":"arxiv-2409.04642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analyzing electrocardiography (ECG) data is essential for diagnosing and\nmonitoring various heart diseases. The clinical adoption of automated methods\nrequires accurate confidence measurements, which are largely absent from\nexisting classification methods. In this paper, we present a robust Gaussian\nProcess classification hyperparameter training model (MuyGPs) for discerning\nnormal heartbeat signals from the signals affected by different arrhythmias and\nmyocardial infarction. We compare the performance of MuyGPs with traditional\nGaussian process classifier as well as conventional machine learning models,\nsuch as, Random Forest, Extra Trees, k-Nearest Neighbors and Convolutional\nNeural Network. Comparing these models reveals MuyGPs as the most performant\nmodel for making confident predictions on individual patient ECGs. Furthermore,\nwe explore the posterior distribution obtained from the Gaussian process to\ninterpret the prediction and quantify uncertainty. In addition, we provide a\nguideline on obtaining the prediction confidence of the machine learning models\nand quantitatively compare the uncertainty measures of these models.\nParticularly, we identify a class of less-accurate (ambiguous) signals for\nfurther diagnosis by an expert.","PeriodicalId":501172,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Electrocardiography Data Classification Confidence: A Robust Gaussian Process Approach (MuyGPs)\",\"authors\":\"Ukamaka V. Nnyaba, Hewan M. Shemtaga, David W. Collins, Amanda L. Muyskens, Benjamin W. Priest, Nedret Billor\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.04642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Analyzing electrocardiography (ECG) data is essential for diagnosing and\\nmonitoring various heart diseases. The clinical adoption of automated methods\\nrequires accurate confidence measurements, which are largely absent from\\nexisting classification methods. In this paper, we present a robust Gaussian\\nProcess classification hyperparameter training model (MuyGPs) for discerning\\nnormal heartbeat signals from the signals affected by different arrhythmias and\\nmyocardial infarction. We compare the performance of MuyGPs with traditional\\nGaussian process classifier as well as conventional machine learning models,\\nsuch as, Random Forest, Extra Trees, k-Nearest Neighbors and Convolutional\\nNeural Network. Comparing these models reveals MuyGPs as the most performant\\nmodel for making confident predictions on individual patient ECGs. Furthermore,\\nwe explore the posterior distribution obtained from the Gaussian process to\\ninterpret the prediction and quantify uncertainty. In addition, we provide a\\nguideline on obtaining the prediction confidence of the machine learning models\\nand quantitatively compare the uncertainty measures of these models.\\nParticularly, we identify a class of less-accurate (ambiguous) signals for\\nfurther diagnosis by an expert.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Applications\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing Electrocardiography Data Classification Confidence: A Robust Gaussian Process Approach (MuyGPs)
Analyzing electrocardiography (ECG) data is essential for diagnosing and
monitoring various heart diseases. The clinical adoption of automated methods
requires accurate confidence measurements, which are largely absent from
existing classification methods. In this paper, we present a robust Gaussian
Process classification hyperparameter training model (MuyGPs) for discerning
normal heartbeat signals from the signals affected by different arrhythmias and
myocardial infarction. We compare the performance of MuyGPs with traditional
Gaussian process classifier as well as conventional machine learning models,
such as, Random Forest, Extra Trees, k-Nearest Neighbors and Convolutional
Neural Network. Comparing these models reveals MuyGPs as the most performant
model for making confident predictions on individual patient ECGs. Furthermore,
we explore the posterior distribution obtained from the Gaussian process to
interpret the prediction and quantify uncertainty. In addition, we provide a
guideline on obtaining the prediction confidence of the machine learning models
and quantitatively compare the uncertainty measures of these models.
Particularly, we identify a class of less-accurate (ambiguous) signals for
further diagnosis by an expert.